• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床鉴别与神经心理学测试:对贝叶斯定理的呼吁。

Clinical discriminations and neuropsychological tests: An appeal to bayes' theorem.

作者信息

Elwood Richard W

机构信息

a Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Tomah , WI.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 1993 Apr;7(2):224-233. doi: 10.1080/13854049308401527.

DOI:10.1080/13854049308401527
PMID:29022471
Abstract

Neuropsychological tests are routinely used to make clinical judgements regarding the classification, diagnosis, or prediction of subject variables. The accuracy of those decisions depends on the discriminant validity of the tests used. The traditional method of validating psychological tests by comparing the mean test scores of reference groups is often unrelated to actual clinical discriminations. Alternative measures based on Bayesian probabilities are reviewed, with specific application to neuropsychological assessment.

摘要

神经心理学测试通常用于对受试者变量的分类、诊断或预测做出临床判断。这些判断的准确性取决于所使用测试的区分效度。通过比较参照组的平均测试分数来验证心理测试的传统方法往往与实际临床鉴别无关。本文回顾了基于贝叶斯概率的替代测量方法,并特别应用于神经心理学评估。

相似文献

1
Clinical discriminations and neuropsychological tests: An appeal to bayes' theorem.临床鉴别与神经心理学测试:对贝叶斯定理的呼吁。
Clin Neuropsychol. 1993 Apr;7(2):224-233. doi: 10.1080/13854049308401527.
2
The Bayesian approach to evaluation of diagnostic data.评估诊断数据的贝叶斯方法。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1991;27(3):385-93.
3
Modeling the clinical assessment of men with suspected obstructed voiding using Bayes' Theorem.运用贝叶斯定理对疑似排尿梗阻男性的临床评估进行建模。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(8):797-801. doi: 10.1002/nau.20587.
4
The value of Bayes' theorem for interpreting abnormal test scores in cognitively healthy and clinical samples.贝叶斯定理在解释认知健康和临床样本中异常测试分数方面的价值。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 Mar;21(3):249-57. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000168. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
5
Enter the reverend: introduction to and application of Bayes' theorem in clinical ophthalmology.进入牧师:贝叶斯定理在临床眼科中的介绍和应用。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;39(9):865-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02592.x. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
6
Off Bayes: effect of verification bias on posterior probabilities calculated using Bayes' theorem.非贝叶斯:验证偏倚对使用贝叶斯定理计算的后验概率的影响。
Med Decis Making. 1992 Jan-Mar;12(1):22-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9201200105.
7
The meaning of malingering data: further applications of Bayes' theorem.诈病数据的意义:贝叶斯定理的进一步应用。
Behav Sci Law. 2000;18(6):761-79. doi: 10.1002/bsl.419.
8
Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.贝叶斯定理在虐待儿童决策应用中的问题。
Child Maltreat. 2009 Feb;14(1):114-20. doi: 10.1177/1077559508318395. Epub 2008 May 21.
9
A qualitative approach to Bayes' theorem.贝叶斯定理的定性方法。
Evid Based Med. 2011 Dec;16(6):163-7. doi: 10.1136/ebm-2011-0007. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
10
Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.诊断测试:一项统计综述。
Muscle Nerve. 1994 Jul;17(7):815-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170719.

引用本文的文献

1
Operating characteristics of executive functioning tests following traumatic brain injury.颅脑损伤后执行功能测验的操作特点。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Nov;24(8):1292-308. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2010.528452.
2
Predicting sulfotyrosine sites using the random forest algorithm with significantly improved prediction accuracy.使用随机森林算法显著提高了磺酪氨酸位点的预测准确性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Oct 29;10:361. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-361.
3
Predictive validity of demographically adjusted normative standards for the HIV Dementia Scale.
人口统计学调整后的 HIV 痴呆量表的预测效度。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan;30(1):83-90. doi: 10.1080/13803390701233865. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
4
MicroCog: assessment of cognitive functioning.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2001 Jun;11(2):89-100. doi: 10.1023/a:1016671201211.
5
Traumatic brain injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: a review.创伤性脑损伤作为阿尔茨海默病的一个危险因素:综述
Neuropsychol Rev. 2000 Jun;10(2):115-29. doi: 10.1023/a:1009068804787.