Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Department of Sport and Exercise, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 May;34(5):1392-1399. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002261.
Blagrove, RC, Brown, N, Howatson, G, and Hayes, PR. Strength and conditioning habits of competitive distance runners. J Strength Cond Res 34(5): 1392-1399, 2020-Targeted strength and conditioning (S&C) programs can potentially improve performance and reduce injury risk factors in competitive runners. However, S&C practices of distance runners are unknown. This study aimed to explore S&C practices of competitive middle- and long-distance runners and examined whether reported frequency of injuries was influenced by training behaviors. One thousand eight hundred eighty-three distance runners (≥15 years old) completed an online survey. All runners who raced competitively were included in data analysis (n = 667). Distance runners mainly engaged with S&C activities to lower risk of injury (63.1%) and improve performance (53.8%). The most common activities used were stretching (86.2%) and core stability exercises (70.2%). Resistance training (RT) and plyometric training (PT) were used by 62.5 and 35.1% of runners, respectively. Junior (under-20) runners include PT, running drills, and circuit training more so than masters runners. Significantly more international standard runners engaged in RT, PT, and fundamental movement skills training compared with competitive club runners. Middle-distance (800-3,000 m) specialists were more likely to include RT, PT, running drills, circuit training, and barefoot exercises in their program than longer-distance runners. Injury frequency was associated with typical weekly running volume and run frequency. Strength and conditioning did not seem to confer a protection against the number of injuries the runners experienced. Practitioners working with distance runners should critically evaluate the current S&C practices of their athletes, to ensure that activities prescribed have a sound evidence-based rationale.
布拉格罗夫、RC、布朗、N、豪特森、G 和海耶斯、PR。竞技长跑运动员的力量和体能训练习惯。J 力量与体能研究 34(5):1392-1399,2020-有针对性的力量和体能（S&C）计划可以潜在地提高表现和降低竞技跑步者的受伤风险因素。然而，距离跑步者的 S&C 做法是未知的。本研究旨在探索竞技中距离跑者的 S&C 做法，并检查报告的受伤频率是否受训练行为的影响。1883 名长跑运动员（≥15 岁）完成了一项在线调查。所有参加比赛的跑步者都包括在数据分析中（n=667）。距离跑步者主要从事 S&C 活动以降低受伤风险（63.1%）和提高表现（53.8%）。最常见的活动是伸展运动（86.2%）和核心稳定性运动（70.2%）。62.5%的跑步者使用阻力训练（RT），35.1%的跑步者使用增强式训练（PT）。初级（20 岁以下）跑步者比大师级跑步者更经常包括 PT、跑步训练和循环训练。国际标准跑步者比竞技俱乐部跑步者更有可能进行 RT、PT 和基本运动技能训练。中距离（800-3000 米）专家比长距离跑步者更有可能在他们的训练计划中包括 RT、PT、跑步训练、循环训练和赤脚训练。受伤频率与典型的每周跑步量和跑步频率有关。力量和体能似乎并没有保护运动员免受他们所经历的受伤次数的影响。与距离跑步者合作的从业者应严格评估运动员目前的 S&C 实践，以确保规定的活动有合理的循证依据。
