Roberts Jessica Louise, Din Nafees Ud, Williams Michelle, Hawkes Claire A, Charles Joanna M, Hoare Zoe, Morrison Val, Alexander Swapna, Lemmey Andrew, Sackley Catherine, Logan Phillipa, Wilkinson Clare, Rycroft-Malone Jo, Williams Nefyn H
School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 11;7(10):e014362. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014362.
To develop an evidence and theory-based complex intervention for improving outcomes in elderly patients following hip fracture.
Complex-intervention development (Medical Research Council (MRC) framework phase I) using realist literature review, surveys and focus groups of patients and rehabilitation teams.
North Wales.
Surveys of therapy managers (n=13), community and hospital-based physiotherapists (n=129) and occupational therapists (n=68) throughout the UK. Focus groups with patients (n=13), their carers (n=4) and members of the multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams in North Wales (n=13).
The realist review provided understanding of how rehabilitation interventions work in the real-world context and three programme theories were developed: improving patient engagement by tailoring the intervention to individual needs; reducing fear of falling and improving self-efficacy to exercise and perform activities of daily living; and coordination of rehabilitation delivery. The survey provided context about usual rehabilitation practice; focus groups provided data on the experience, acceptability and feasibility of rehabilitation interventions. An intervention to enhance usual rehabilitation was developed to target these theory areas comprising: a physical component consisting of six additional therapy sessions; and a psychological component consisting of a workbook to enhance self-efficacy and a patient-held goal-setting diary for self-monitoring.
A realist approach may have advantages in the development of evidence-based interventions and can be used in conjunction with other established methods to contribute to the development of potentially more effective interventions. A rehabilitation intervention was developed which can be tested in a future randomised controlled trial (MRC framework phases II and III).
ISRCTN22464643, Pre-results.
开发一种基于证据和理论的综合干预措施,以改善老年髋部骨折患者的预后。
采用现实主义文献综述、患者及康复团队调查和焦点小组的综合干预开发(医学研究理事会(MRC)框架第一阶段)。
北威尔士。
对全英国的治疗经理(n = 13)、社区和医院的物理治疗师(n = 129)以及职业治疗师(n = 68)进行调查。对北威尔士的患者(n = 13)、他们的护理人员(n = 4)以及多学科康复团队成员(n = 13)进行焦点小组访谈。
现实主义综述有助于理解康复干预在现实环境中的作用方式,并形成了三种项目理论:根据个体需求调整干预措施以提高患者参与度;减少跌倒恐惧并提高锻炼及进行日常生活活动的自我效能;协调康复服务的提供。调查提供了常规康复实践的背景信息;焦点小组提供了关于康复干预的经验、可接受性和可行性的数据。针对这些理论领域开发了一种强化常规康复的干预措施,包括:一个物理组成部分,增加六次治疗课程;一个心理组成部分,包括一本提高自我效能的工作手册和一本用于自我监测的患者目标设定日记。
现实主义方法在循证干预措施的开发中可能具有优势,并且可以与其他既定方法结合使用以促进潜在更有效干预措施的开发。开发了一种康复干预措施,可在未来的随机对照试验(MRC框架第二和第三阶段)中进行测试。
ISRCTN22464643,预结果。