• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康成年人对连续theta波爆发刺激反应的个体间变异性。

Interindividual variability in response to continuous theta-burst stimulation in healthy adults.

作者信息

Jannati Ali, Block Gabrielle, Oberman Lindsay M, Rotenberg Alexander, Pascual-Leone Alvaro

机构信息

Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov;128(11):2268-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.023
PMID:29028501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5675807/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We used complete-linkage cluster analysis to identify healthy subpopulations with distinct responses to continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS).

METHODS

21 healthy adults (age±SD, 36.9±15.2years) underwent cTBS of left motor cortex. Natural log-transformed motor evoked potentials (LnMEPs) at 5-50min post-cTBS (T5-T50) were calculated.

RESULTS

Two clusters were found; Group 1 (n=12) that showed significant MEP facilitation at T15, T20, and T50 (p's<0.006), and Group 2 (n=9) that showed significant suppression at T5-T15 (p's<0.022). LnMEPs at T10 and T40 were best predictors of, and together accounted for 80% of, cluster assignment. In an exploratory analysis, we examined the roles of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphisms in the cTBS response. Val66Met participants showed greater facilitation at T10 than Val66Val participants (p=0.025). BDNF and cTBS intensity predicted 59% of interindividual variability in LnMEP at T10. APOE did not significantly affect LnMEPs at any time point (p's>0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Data-driven cluster analysis can identify healthy subpopulations with distinct cTBS responses. T10 and T40 LnMEPs were best predictors of cluster assignment. T10 LnMEP was influenced by BDNF polymorphism and cTBS intensity.

SIGNIFICANCE

Healthy adults can be sorted into subpopulations with distinct cTBS responses that are influenced by genetics.

摘要

目的

我们采用完全连锁聚类分析来识别对连续θ波爆发刺激(cTBS)有不同反应的健康亚群。

方法

21名健康成年人(年龄±标准差,36.9±15.2岁)接受了左侧运动皮层的cTBS。计算cTBS后5 - 50分钟(T5 - T50)时自然对数转换后的运动诱发电位(LnMEPs)。

结果

发现两个聚类;第1组(n = 12)在T15、T20和T50时显示出显著的运动诱发电位易化(p值<0.006),第2组(n = 9)在T5 - T15时显示出显著抑制(p值<0.022)。T10和T40时的LnMEPs是聚类分配的最佳预测指标,二者共同解释了80%的聚类分配情况。在一项探索性分析中,我们研究了脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)和载脂蛋白E(APOE)基因多态性在cTBS反应中的作用。Val66Met参与者在T10时比Val66Val参与者表现出更大的易化(p = 0.025)。BDNF和cTBS强度预测了T10时LnMEP个体间变异性的59%。APOE在任何时间点均未对LnMEPs产生显著影响(p值>0.32)。

结论

数据驱动的聚类分析可识别出对cTBS有不同反应的健康亚群。T10和T40时的LnMEPs是聚类分配的最佳预测指标。T10时的LnMEP受BDNF基因多态性和cTBS强度的影响。

意义

健康成年人可被分为对cTBS有不同反应且受基因影响的亚群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/0d9838c4a499/nihms907828f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/a2f5b6bc408f/nihms907828f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/7f6dd926ac1f/nihms907828f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/52541702ea08/nihms907828f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/0d9838c4a499/nihms907828f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/a2f5b6bc408f/nihms907828f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/7f6dd926ac1f/nihms907828f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/52541702ea08/nihms907828f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fa/5675807/0d9838c4a499/nihms907828f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Interindividual variability in response to continuous theta-burst stimulation in healthy adults.健康成年人对连续theta波爆发刺激反应的个体间变异性。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov;128(11):2268-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Polymorphism Predicts Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients.脑源性神经营养因子基因多态性可预测慢性脑卒中患者对连续 theta 爆发刺激的反应。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Jun;25(4):569-577. doi: 10.1111/ner.13495. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Modulation of motor cortical excitability by continuous theta-burst stimulation in adults with autism spectrum disorder.经连续 theta 爆发刺激调节自闭症谱系障碍成人运动皮质兴奋性。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul;132(7):1647-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Gamma-transcranial alternating current stimulation and theta-burst stimulation: inter-subject variability and the role of BDNF.伽马经颅交流电刺激和 theta 爆发刺激:个体间变异性和 BDNF 的作用。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Nov;131(11):2691-2699. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
BDNF and LTP-/LTD-like plasticity of the primary motor cortex in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.吉尔斯·德·拉·图雷特综合征中脑源性神经营养因子与初级运动皮层的长时程增强样/长时程抑制样可塑性
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):841-850. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4847-6. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
The intensity of continuous theta burst stimulation, but not the waveform used to elicit motor evoked potentials, influences its outcome in the human motor cortex.连续 theta 爆发刺激的强度,而不是用来引出运动诱发电位的波形,影响其在人类运动皮层的结果。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):400-410. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Inter- and intra-subject variability of motor cortex plasticity following continuous theta-burst stimulation.连续θ波爆发刺激后运动皮层可塑性的受试者间和受试者内变异性。
Neuroscience. 2015 Sep 24;304:266-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.043. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
8
Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration'.大规模分析经颅磁刺激数据中的个体间变异性:来自“大型 TMS 数据合作”的结果。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):1476-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
9
Reproducibility of the effects of theta burst stimulation on motor cortical plasticity in healthy participants.健康参与者中 theta 爆发刺激对运动皮质可塑性影响的可重复性。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;125(2):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
10
A comparison of two different continuous theta burst stimulation paradigms applied to the human primary motor cortex.两种不同的连续 theta 爆发刺激范式在人类初级运动皮层的比较。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Nov;123(11):2256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning from missteps: Potential of transcranial electrical stimulation in neuropsychological rehabilitation.从失误中学习:经颅电刺激在神经心理康复中的潜力
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Sep;19(3):655-681. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12425. Epub 2025 Mar 23.
2
Subthreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces cortical layer-, brain region-, and protocol-dependent neural plasticity.阈下重复经颅磁刺激可诱导皮层层、脑区和方案依赖性神经可塑性。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jan 10;11(2):eado6705. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado6705. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
3
Parietal theta burst TMS does not modulate bistable perception.

本文引用的文献

1
Humans with Type-2 Diabetes Show Abnormal Long-Term Potentiation-Like Cortical Plasticity Associated with Verbal Learning Deficits.2型糖尿病患者表现出与言语学习缺陷相关的异常的类似长时程增强的皮质可塑性。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;55(1):89-100. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160505.
2
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of refractory epilepsy.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性癫痫
Expert Rev Neurother. 2016 Sep;16(9):1093-110. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2016.1197119. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
Abnormal Mechanisms of Plasticity and Metaplasticity in Autism Spectrum Disorders and Fragile X Syndrome.
顶叶θ波爆发式经颅磁刺激不调节双眼竞争知觉。
Neurosci Conscious. 2024 Mar 17;2024(1):niae009. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae009. eCollection 2024.
4
Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation: Safety, Efficacy, and Future Advancements.加速 theta 爆发刺激:安全性、疗效和未来进展。
Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 15;95(6):523-535. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.12.004.
5
Driving innovation in addiction treatment: role of transcranial magnetic stimulation.推动成瘾治疗创新:经颅磁刺激的作用。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2024 May;131(5):505-508. doi: 10.1007/s00702-023-02734-2. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Converging Evidence for Frontopolar Cortex as a Target for Neuromodulation in Addiction Treatment.前额极皮质作为成瘾治疗中神经调节靶点的汇聚证据。
Am J Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 1;181(2):100-114. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20221022. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
7
Alzheimer's disease phenotype based upon the carrier status of the apolipoprotein E ɛ4 allele.基于载脂蛋白 E ε4 等位基因携带状态的阿尔茨海默病表型。
Brain Pathol. 2024 Jan;34(1):e13208. doi: 10.1111/bpa.13208. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
8
The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS.双相磁刺激与单相磁刺激中脉冲形状的影响。
Brain Stimul. 2023 Jul-Aug;16(4):1178-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
9
A systematic review of the neurobiological effects of theta-burst stimulation (TBS) as measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).一项使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量的 theta 爆发刺激(TBS)的神经生物学效应的系统评价。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 May;228(3-4):717-749. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02634-x. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
10
An agile, data-driven approach for target selection in rTMS therapy for anxiety symptoms: Proof of concept and preliminary data for two novel targets.一种针对焦虑症状 rTMS 治疗中目标选择的敏捷、数据驱动方法:两个新靶点的概念验证和初步数据。
Brain Behav. 2023 May;13(5):e2914. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2914. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
自闭症谱系障碍和脆性X综合征中可塑性和元可塑性的异常机制
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Sep;26(7):617-24. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0166. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
Optimal number of pulses as outcome measures of neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.作为神经导航经颅磁刺激结果指标的最佳脉冲数
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug;127(8):2892-2897. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
5
Combining Robotic Training and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Severe Upper Limb-Impaired Chronic Stroke Patients.将机器人训练与非侵入性脑刺激相结合用于重度上肢功能受损的慢性中风患者
Front Neurosci. 2016 Mar 8;10:88. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00088. eCollection 2016.
6
Ten Years of Theta Burst Stimulation in Humans: Established Knowledge, Unknowns and Prospects.人类 theta 爆发刺激十年:既定知识、未知和前景。
Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):323-335. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
7
Minimum number of trials required for within- and between-session reliability of TMS measures of corticospinal excitability.经颅磁刺激测量皮质脊髓兴奋性的组内和组间信度所需的最少试验次数。
Neuroscience. 2016 Apr 21;320:205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
8
A global reference for human genetic variation.人类遗传变异的全球参考。
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393.
9
Inter-individual variability in cortical excitability and motor network connectivity following multiple blocks of rTMS.多次重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)后皮质兴奋性和运动网络连接的个体间变异性。
Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
10
Efficacy and Time Course of Theta Burst Stimulation in Healthy Humans.Theta 爆发刺激对健康人类的疗效和时程。
Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):685-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 26.