• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面孔的第一印象源自何处?

Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychological Sciences; Birkbeck, University of London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.002
PMID:29028612
Abstract

Humans spontaneously attribute a wide range of traits to strangers based solely on their facial features. These first impressions are known to exert striking effects on our choices and behaviours. In this paper, we provide a theoretical account of the origins of these spontaneous trait inferences. We describe a novel framework ('Trait Inference Mapping') in which trait inferences are products of mappings between locations in 'face space' and 'trait space'. These mappings are acquired during ontogeny and allow excitation of face representations to propagate automatically to associated trait representations. This conceptualization provides a framework within which the relative contribution of ontogenetic experience and genetic inheritance can be considered. Contrary to many existing ideas about the origins of trait inferences, we propose only a limited role for innate mechanisms and natural selection. Instead, our model explains inter-observer consistency by appealing to cultural learning and physiological responses that facilitate or 'canalise' particular face-trait mappings. Our TIM framework has both theoretical and substantive implications, and can be extended to trait inferences from non-facial cues to provide a unified account of first impressions.

摘要

人类会根据陌生人的面部特征自发地赋予他们各种各样的特征。这些第一印象对我们的选择和行为会产生显著的影响。在本文中,我们提供了一种关于这些自发特征推断起源的理论解释。我们描述了一个新的框架(“特征推断映射”),其中特征推断是“面部空间”和“特征空间”之间位置映射的产物。这些映射是在个体发生过程中获得的,允许对面部表示的兴奋自动传播到相关的特征表示。这种概念化提供了一个框架,可以考虑个体发生经验和遗传继承的相对贡献。与许多关于特征推断起源的现有观点相反,我们仅提出了先天机制和自然选择的有限作用。相反,我们的模型通过诉诸于促进或“引导”特定面孔-特征映射的文化学习和生理反应来解释观察者之间的一致性。我们的 TIM 框架具有理论和实质意义,并可以扩展到非面部线索的特征推断,以提供第一印象的统一解释。

相似文献

1
Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from?面孔的第一印象源自何处?
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
2
The cultural learning account of first impressions.第一印象的文化学习理论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Aug;26(8):656-668. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
3
Ritual and the origins of first impressions.仪式与第一印象的起源。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 17;375(1805):20190435. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0435. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Contextual modulation of appearance-trait learning.语境对表象-特质学习的调节。
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105288. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105288. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
5
Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.面部的性别和刻板印象会影响对面部特征的评价:与刻板印象相悖的女性面孔会得到负面评价。
Br J Psychol. 2015 May;106(2):186-208. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12085. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
6
Understanding trait impressions from faces.从面部理解特质印象。
Br J Psychol. 2022 Nov;113(4):1056-1078. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12583. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
7
First impressions from faces in the real world: Commentary on Sutherland and Young (2022).来自现实世界中面孔的第一印象:评 Sutherland 和 Young (2022)。
Br J Psychol. 2023 May;114(2):508-510. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12621. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
8
The social factors behind the mask: contextual effects on trait impressions from faces wearing a face mask.口罩背后的社会因素:口罩对面部特征印象的情境影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 27;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00570-w.
9
The conceptual structure of face impressions.面部印象的概念结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9210-9215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807222115. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
10
Understanding facial impressions between and within identities.理解身份之间和内部的面部印象。
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:184-198. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Perception of Trustworthiness and Emotional Identification in Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: A Behavioral Pilot Study.遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性对可信度和情感认同的认知:一项行为试点研究。
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 23;15(5):429. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050429.
2
Do young and older adult populations perform equivalently across different automatic face-trait judgements? Evidence for differential impacts of ageing.年轻人和老年人在不同的自动面部特征判断中表现是否相同?衰老的差异影响证据。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322165. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancing Gait Analysis: Integrating Multimodal Neuroimaging and Extended Reality Technologies.
推进步态分析:整合多模态神经影像学与扩展现实技术
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;12(3):313. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12030313.
4
Implicit bias and experience influence overall but not relative trustworthiness judgment of other-race faces.内隐偏见和经验会影响对异族面孔的整体但不是相对的可信度判断。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66705-7.
5
I believe what I see: Impact of attire and academic degree on evaluation of personality traits of a politician.我相信我所看到的:着装和学术学位对政治家性格特征评价的影响。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2021 Dec 10;10(4):311-320. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2021.110851. eCollection 2022.
6
fMRI evidence that hyper-caricatured faces activate object-selective cortex.功能磁共振成像证据表明,过度夸张的面部会激活物体选择性皮层。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1035524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035524. eCollection 2022.
7
Preferential looking studies of trustworthiness detection confound structural and expressive cues to facial trustworthiness.优先注视研究中的可信度检测混淆了面部可信度的结构和表情线索。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 21;12(1):17709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21586-6.
8
Sensitivity to trustworthiness cues in own- and other-race faces: The role of spatial frequency information.对自身和异族面孔可信度线索的敏感性:空间频率信息的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0272256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272256. eCollection 2022.
9
Age differences in facial trustworthiness perception are diminished by affective processing.情感加工可减少面部可信度感知中的年龄差异。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Jul 23;19(3):413-422. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00643-5. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Understanding trait impressions from faces.从面部理解特质印象。
Br J Psychol. 2022 Nov;113(4):1056-1078. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12583. Epub 2022 Jul 26.