• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

树脂水门汀类型和热机械老化对粘结于钛植入体的定制氧化锆基台固位强度的影响。

The Effect of Resin Cement Type and Thermomechanical Aging on the Retentive Strength of Custom Zirconia Abutments Bonded to Titanium Inserts.

作者信息

Bankoğlu Güngör Merve, Karakoca Nemli Seçil

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/June;33(3):523–529. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5920. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.5920
PMID:29028849
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of resin cement type on the retentive strength of custom zirconia abutments bonded to titanium inserts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty implant (4.3 mm diameter and 11.5 mm length) and custom zirconia abutment (15 mm height and 2 mm wall thickness) pairs were used to form six groups (n = 10 each). Three different resin cements were used to bond the zirconia abutments and titanium inserts: Panavia F 2.0, Zirconite, and Multilink Hybrid Abutment. Control groups and thermomechanically aged groups were formed. Specimens were subjected to tensile test to failure, and the retention values were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Two-way ANOVA showed a significant effect of the cement type and thermomechanical aging (P < .05). Regardless of the cement, control groups showed significantly (P < .05) higher retentive strength than the thermomechanically aged groups. Comparing the resin cements, the retentive strength of Zirconite, aged or not, was higher than that of Panavia F 2.0 and Multilink Hybrid Abutment; no significant differences between the latter two cements were found. In the Zirconite group, adhesive failure occurred mostly between the titanium and the resin cement. In the Panavia F 2.0 and Multilink Hybrid Abutment groups, adhesive failure between the zirconia and the resin cement was observed.

CONCLUSION

Resin cement type had an effect on the retentive strength of custom zirconia abutments bonded to titanium inserts. Thermomechanical aging had a negative effect on the retentive strength. Zirconite adhesively bonded to the zirconia surface of the custom abutment. Differences were noted in adhesive failure types among the cements.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨树脂水门汀类型对粘结于钛植入体上的定制氧化锆基台固位强度的影响。

材料与方法

使用60对种植体(直径4.3 mm,长度11.5 mm)和定制氧化锆基台(高度15 mm,壁厚2 mm),分为6组(每组n = 10)。使用三种不同的树脂水门汀粘结氧化锆基台和钛植入体:Panavia F 2.0、Zirconite和Multilink Hybrid Abutment。形成对照组和热机械老化组。对标本进行拉伸试验直至破坏,并通过双向方差分析(ANOVA)分析固位值。

结果

双向ANOVA显示水门汀类型和热机械老化有显著影响(P < .05)。无论使用何种水门汀,对照组的固位强度均显著高于热机械老化组(P < .05)。比较树脂水门汀,Zirconite无论是否老化,其固位强度均高于Panavia F 2.0和Multilink Hybrid Abutment;后两种水门汀之间未发现显著差异。在Zirconite组中,粘结失败主要发生在钛和树脂水门汀之间。在Panavia F 2.0和Multilink Hybrid Abutment组中,观察到氧化锆和树脂水门汀之间的粘结失败。

结论

树脂水门汀类型对粘结于钛植入体上的定制氧化锆基台的固位强度有影响。热机械老化对固位强度有负面影响。Zirconite粘结于定制基台的氧化锆表面。不同水门汀的粘结失败类型存在差异。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Resin Cement Type and Thermomechanical Aging on the Retentive Strength of Custom Zirconia Abutments Bonded to Titanium Inserts.树脂水门汀类型和热机械老化对粘结于钛植入体的定制氧化锆基台固位强度的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/June;33(3):523–529. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5920. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
2
Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.两种带自粘接树脂水门汀的二氧化锆基台对钛的固位力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.020. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.两件式计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造氧化锆种植体基台的固位强度
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):920-5. doi: 10.1111/cid.12060. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
4
Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.不同水门汀对金属遮色剂处理的钛基台表面氧化锆全瓷修复体固位力的评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Mar-Apr;37(2):339-345. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9329.
5
Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements.使用6种不同粘结剂时,氧化锆定制基台上种植体支持的CAD-CAM二硅酸锂全冠的固位强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Feb;117(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant.水泥类型和陶瓷底漆对一体式氧化锆种植体上聚合物渗透陶瓷冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jan;119(1):138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
7
Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.内间隙宽度和粘结剂类型对拉伸试验中氧化锆全冠固位力的影响。
J Dent. 2012 Oct;40(10):866-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
8
Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.氧化锆全瓷冠固位力的研究进展:氧化锆基底与钛基底
Implant Dent. 2017 Aug;26(4):510-515. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000589.
9
Effect of reduced airborne-particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments.降低空气粒子喷砂压力对氧化锆全瓷冠粘结于钛基台的固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jul;124(1):60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
10
Influence of Different Cleaning Procedures on Tensile Bond Strength Between Zirconia Abutment and Titanium Base.不同清洗程序对氧化锆基台与钛基底之间拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):1318-1327. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7638.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported Ceramic Restorations Luted to Titanium Bases: A Systematic Review of in-vitro Studies.黏附于钛基的CAD-CAM种植体支持的陶瓷修复体的留存率:体外研究的系统评价
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Aug 1;17:305-333. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S540951. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effect of Zirconia Material and the Height of the Ceramic Coping on the Strength of Hybrid Ti-Ceramic Abutments.氧化锆材料及陶瓷基底高度对混合钛陶瓷基台强度的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;13(7):284. doi: 10.3390/dj13070284.
3
Bonding Strength of Various Luting Agents between Zirconium Dioxide Crowns and Titanium Bonding Bases after Long-Term Artificial Chewing.
长期人工咀嚼后二氧化锆全冠与钛粘结基底之间各种粘结剂的粘结强度
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 24;16(23):7314. doi: 10.3390/ma16237314.
4
Effect of surface treatment and luting agent type on shear bond strength of titanium to ceramic materials.表面处理和粘结剂类型对钛与陶瓷材料剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Apr;14(2):78-87. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.78. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
Retention of cemented zirconia copings on TiBase abutments.TiBase 基台上黏固氧化锆全瓷冠的保留。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2021 Dec 31;34(3):214-220. doi: 10.54589/aol.34/3/214.
6
Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases - an study.种植体支持的钛基台上粘结的氧化锆或聚合物基冠的粘结强度——一项研究。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2021 Sep 13;8(1):129-136. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2021.1974301. eCollection 2021.
7
Bond strength between titanium and polymer-based materials adhesively cemented.钛与聚合物基材料之间通过粘结剂粘结的粘结强度。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2021 Jun 20;8(1):79-86. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2021.1937182.
8
Retentive Force of Glass-Ceramic Soldered Customized Zirconia Abutment Copings with Prefabricated Titanium Bases.玻璃陶瓷焊接定制氧化锆基台冠与预制钛基托的固位力
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 17;13(14):3193. doi: 10.3390/ma13143193.
9
Qualitative and Semi-Quantitative Assessment of Processing-Related Surface Contamination of One- and Two-Piece CAD/CAM Abutments before and after Ultrasonic Cleaning.超声清洗前后一体式和两件式CAD/CAM基台加工相关表面污染的定性和半定量评估
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 20;13(14):3225. doi: 10.3390/ma13143225.
10
Load-Bearing Capacity of Zirconia Crowns Screwed to Multi-Unit Abutments with and without a Titanium Base: An In Vitro Pilot Study.带或不带钛基底的螺丝固位多单位基牙氧化锆全冠的承载能力:一项体外初步研究。
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 20;12(19):3056. doi: 10.3390/ma12193056.