• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Comprehensive Comparison of Quantifications of Intraindividual Variability in Response Times: A Measurement Burst Approach.个体内反应时变异性的定量综合比较:测量突发方法。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):397-408. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx115.
2
Comparing individual differences in inconsistency and plasticity as predictors of cognitive function in older adults.比较老年人认知功能预测指标中不一致性和可塑性的个体差异。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016;38(5):534-50. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1136598. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
3
Aerobic Fitness and Intraindividual Reaction Time Variability in Middle and Old Age.中老年人群的有氧适能与个体内反应时变异性
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 May;71(3):431-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu152. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
Longitudinal changes in response time mean and inconsistency exhibit predictive dissociations for risk of cognitive impairment.反应时间均值和不一致性的纵向变化对认知障碍风险表现出预测性分离。
Neuropsychology. 2020 Mar;34(3):264-275. doi: 10.1037/neu0000608. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Cognitively-Impaired-Not-Demented Status Moderates the Time-Varying Association between Finger Tapping Inconsistency and Executive Performance.认知功能受损但未患痴呆状态调节了手指敲击不一致性与执行功能之间随时间变化的关联。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Feb;32(1):110-116. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw084. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
6
The influence of social support and perceived stress on response time inconsistency.社会支持和感知压力对反应时不一致性的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Feb;23(2):214-221. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1399339. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
7
Associations Between Control Beliefs and Response Time Inconsistency in Older Adults Vary as a Function of Attentional Task Demands.控制信念与老年人反应时不一致性之间的关联随注意任务需求的变化而变化。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Oct 16;75(9):1819-1830. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby124.
8
Aging-Related Changes in the Association between Negative Affect and Response Time Inconsistency in Older Adulthood.老年期负面情绪与反应时间不一致之间关联的衰老相关变化。
Int J Behav Dev. 2021 Mar 1;45(2):109-121. doi: 10.1177/0165025420937081. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
9
Intraindividual variability in neurocognitive speed: a comparison of Parkinson's disease and normal older adults.神经认知速度的个体内变异性:帕金森病与正常老年人的比较。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 18;45(11):2499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.022. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
10
Parameterizing Practice in a Longitudinal Measurement Burst Design to Dissociate Retest Effects From Developmental Change: Implications for Aging Neuroscience.在纵向测量突发设计中对实践进行参数化以区分重测效应与发育变化:对衰老神经科学的启示
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jun 3;14:885621. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.885621. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The construct validity of daily cognitive variability.日常认知变异性的结构效度。
Psychol Aging. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1037/pag0000932.
2
Disentangling sources of variability in decision-making.理清决策中变异性的来源。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025 May;26(5):247-262. doi: 10.1038/s41583-025-00916-3. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
Characterizing Cognitive Dispersion and Its Correlates Across the Adult Lifespan in MIDUS.刻画中年及老年成人认知分散及其在成年期各阶段的相关因素(基于MIDUS研究)
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 May 8;80(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae201.
4
A Diffusion Model Account of Cognitive Variability in Healthy Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment.健康衰老和轻度认知障碍中认知变异性的扩散模型解释
Exp Aging Res. 2025 May-Jun;51(3):285-302. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2024.2409588. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
5
The mobile everyday cognition scale (mECog): Development and pilot testing.移动日常认知量表(mECog):开发与预试验
Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Feb;39(2):451-470. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2024.2383333. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
6
Development and Validity of Norms for Cognitive Dispersion on the Uniform Data Set 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery.《统一数据集中认知分散的规范制定与有效性:3.0 神经心理测验版》。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Aug 24;39(6):732-746. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae005.
7
Naturalistic assessment of reaction time variability in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease.自然评估法评估老年阿尔茨海默病高危人群的反应时变异。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2024 Jun;30(5):428-438. doi: 10.1017/S1355617723011475. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
8
Adherence type impacts completion rates of frequent mobile cognitive assessments among older adults with and without cognitive impairment.依从类型会影响有认知障碍和无认知障碍的老年人频繁进行移动认知评估的完成率。
Res Sq. 2023 Sep 29:rs.3.rs-3350075. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3350075/v1.
9
Face Name Associative Memory Exam and biomarker status in the ARMADA study: Advancing reliable measurement in Alzheimer's disease and cognitive aging.ARMADA研究中的面孔-名字联想记忆测试与生物标志物状态:推进阿尔茨海默病和认知衰老的可靠测量
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Sep 7;15(3):e12473. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12473. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
10
Relationships between hourly cognitive variability and risk of Alzheimer's disease revealed with mixed-effects location scale models.混合效应位置尺度模型揭示了认知变异性与阿尔茨海默病风险之间的关系。
Neuropsychology. 2024 Jan;38(1):69-80. doi: 10.1037/neu0000905. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Fusing Biodiversity Metrics into Investigations of Daily Life: Illustrations and Recommendations With Emodiversity.将生物多样性指标融入日常生活研究:以情绪多样性为例的说明和建议。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Dec 15;73(1):75-86. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx025.
2
Intraindividual Reaction Time Variability, Falls, and Gait in Old Age: A Systematic Review.老年个体内反应时间变异性、跌倒与步态:一项系统综述
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Sep;71(5):857-64. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv027. Epub 2015 May 11.
3
Aging and switching the focus of attention in working memory: age differences in item availability but not in item accessibility.衰老和工作记忆中注意力焦点的转换:项目可用性的年龄差异,但项目可及性没有差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Sep;66(5):519-26. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr028. Epub 2011 May 12.
4
Intraindividual variability is related to cognitive change in older adults: evidence for within-person coupling.个体内变异性与老年人的认知变化有关:个体内耦合的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep;25(3):575-86. doi: 10.1037/a0019503.
5
On the relation of mean reaction time and intraindividual reaction time variability.关于平均反应时间和个体内反应时变异性的关系。
Psychol Aging. 2009 Dec;24(4):841-57. doi: 10.1037/a0017799.
6
Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes.时间结构和净个体内变异性:用于检查动态特征和过程发展的工具。
Psychol Aging. 2009 Dec;24(4):778-91. doi: 10.1037/a0017915.
7
Aging and intraindividual variability in performance: analyses of response time distributions.衰老与个体内部的表现变异性:反应时间分布分析
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Nov;88(3):319-37. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-319.
8
Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.反应时间分布各成分的个体差异及其与工作记忆和智力的关系。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):414-29. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414.
9
Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition.日常压力与认知的个体内耦合
Psychol Aging. 2006 Sep;21(3):545-57. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.545.
10
The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention.注意力瞬间失误的神经基础。
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):971-8. doi: 10.1038/nn1727. Epub 2006 Jun 11.

个体内反应时变异性的定量综合比较:测量突发方法。

A Comprehensive Comparison of Quantifications of Intraindividual Variability in Response Times: A Measurement Burst Approach.

机构信息

School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis.

Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, British Columbia.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):397-408. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx115.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbx115
PMID:29029201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6377057/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To formally identify and contrast the most commonly-employed quantifications of response time inconsistency (RTI) and elucidate their utility for understanding within-person (WP) and between-person (BP) variation in cognitive function with increasing age.

METHOD

Using two measurement burst studies of cognitive aging, we systematically identified and computed five RTI quantifications from select disciplines to examine: (a) correlations among RTI quantifications; (b) the distribution of BP and WP variation in RTI; and (c) the comparability of RTI quantifications for predicting attention switching.

RESULTS

Comparable patterns were observed across studies. There was significant variation in RTI BP as well as WP across sessions and bursts. Correlations among RTI quantifications were generally strong and positive both WP and BP, except for the coefficient of variation. Independent prediction models indicated that slower mean response time (RT) and greater RTI were associated with slower attention switching both WP and BP. For selecting simultaneous prediction models, collinearity resulted in inflated standard errors and unstable model estimates.

DISCUSSION

RTI reflects a novel dimension of performance that is a robust and theoretically informative predictor of BP and WP variation in cognitive function. Among the plenitude of RTI quantifications, not all are interchangeable, nor of comparable predictive utility.

摘要

目的

正式识别和对比反应时不一致(RTI)最常用的量化方法,并阐明它们在理解认知功能随年龄增长的个体内(WP)和个体间(BP)变化方面的效用。

方法

使用两项认知老化的测量爆发研究,我们系统地从选定的学科中识别和计算了五种 RTI 量化方法,以考察:(a)RTI 量化方法之间的相关性;(b)BP 和 WP 中 RTI 变化的分布;(c)预测注意力转换时 RTI 量化方法的可比性。

结果

在两项研究中均观察到类似的模式。在各个会话和爆发中,BP 和 WP 之间的 RTI 存在显著差异。WP 和 BP 中,除了变异系数外,RTI 量化方法之间的相关性通常较强且为正相关。独立的预测模型表明,平均反应时间(RT)越慢和 RTI 越大,WP 和 BP 中的注意力转换速度越慢。对于选择同时预测模型,共线性导致标准误差膨胀和模型估计不稳定。

讨论

RTI 反映了一种新的性能维度,是认知功能 BP 和 WP 变化的稳健且具有理论意义的预测指标。在大量的 RTI 量化方法中,并非所有方法都是可互换的,也不是具有可比的预测效用。