Adani Flavia, Stegenwallner-Schütz Maja, Niesel Talea
Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01590. eCollection 2017.
The predictions of two contrasting approaches to the acquisition of transitive relative clauses were tested within the same groups of German-speaking participants aged from 3 to 5 years old. The input frequency approach predicts that object relative clauses with inanimate heads (e.g., ) are comprehended earlier and more accurately than those with an animate head (e.g., ). In contrast, the structural intervention approach predicts that object relative clauses with two full NP arguments mismatching in number (e.g., ) are comprehended earlier and more accurately than those with number-matching NPs (e.g., ). These approaches were tested in two steps. First, we ran a corpus analysis to ensure that object relative clauses with number-mismatching NPs are not more frequent than object relative clauses with number-matching NPs in child directed speech. Next, the comprehension of these structures was tested experimentally in 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds respectively by means of a color naming task. By comparing the predictions of the two approaches within the same participant groups, we were able to uncover that the effects predicted by the input frequency and by the structural intervention approaches co-exist and that they both influence the performance of children on transitive relative clauses, but in a manner that is modulated by age. These results reveal a sensitivity to animacy mismatch already being demonstrated by 3-year-olds and show that animacy is initially deployed more reliably than number to interpret relative clauses correctly. In all age groups, the animacy mismatch appears to explain the performance of children, thus, showing that the comprehension of frequent object relative clauses is enhanced compared to the other conditions. Starting with 4-year-olds but especially in 5-year-olds, the number mismatch supported comprehension-a facilitation that is unlikely to be driven by input frequency. Once children fine-tune their sensitivity to verb agreement information around the age of four, they are also able to deploy number marking to overcome the intervention effects. This study highlights the importance of testing experimentally contrasting theoretical approaches in order to characterize the multifaceted, developmental nature of language acquisition.
在3至5岁的德语儿童组中,对两种截然不同的及物关系从句习得方法的预测进行了测试。输入频率方法预测,以无生命物体为主语的宾语关系从句(例如……)比以有生命物体为主语的宾语关系从句(例如……)更早且更准确地被理解。相比之下,结构干预方法预测,两个完整名词短语数量不匹配的宾语关系从句(例如……)比数量匹配的名词短语的宾语关系从句(例如……)更早且更准确地被理解。这些方法分两步进行测试。首先,我们进行了语料库分析,以确保在儿童导向性言语中,数量不匹配名词短语的宾语关系从句不会比数量匹配名词短语的宾语关系从句更频繁出现。接下来,分别通过颜色命名任务对3岁、4岁和5岁儿童对这些结构的理解进行了实验测试。通过在同一受试组中比较两种方法的预测,我们发现输入频率方法和结构干预方法所预测的效果同时存在,且它们都影响儿童在及物关系从句上的表现,但这种影响方式会受到年龄的调节。这些结果表明,3岁儿童就已表现出对生命性不匹配的敏感性,并且表明在正确解释关系从句时,生命性最初比数量更可靠地被运用。在所有年龄组中,生命性不匹配似乎都能解释儿童的表现,因此表明与其他条件相比,频繁出现的宾语关系从句的理解得到了增强。从4岁儿童开始,尤其是5岁儿童,数量不匹配有助于理解——这种促进作用不太可能是由输入频率驱动的。一旦儿童在四岁左右微调了他们对动词一致性信息的敏感性,他们也能够运用数的标记来克服干预效果。这项研究强调了通过实验测试相互对立的理论方法对于刻画语言习得多方面发展本质的重要性。