Suppr超能文献

语法特征差异使关系从句更易理解:一项针对意大利儿童的理解研究。

Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children.

作者信息

Adani Flavia, van der Lely Heather K J, Forgiarini Matteo, Guasti Maria Teresa

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy.

出版信息

Lingua. 2010 Sep;120(9-3):2148-2166. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.018.

Abstract

The Relativized Minimality approach to A'-dependencies (Friedmann et al., 2009) predicts that headed object relative clauses (RCs) and which-questions are the most difficult, due to the presence of a lexical restriction on both the subject and the object DP which creates intervention. We investigated comprehension of center-embedded headed object RCs with Italian children, where Number and Gender feature values on subject and object DPs are manipulated. We found that, Number conditions are always more accurate than Gender ones, showing that intervention is sensitive to DP-internal structure. We propose a finer definition of the lexical restriction where external and syntactically active features (such as Number) reduce intervention whereas internal and (possibly) lexicalized features (such as Gender) do so to a lesser extent. Our results are also compatible with a memory interference approach in which the human parser is sensitive to highly specific properties of the linguistic input, such as the cue-based model (Van Dyke, 2007).

摘要

A'-依存关系的相对最简方案(弗里德曼等人,2009)预测,带中心语的宾语关系从句(RCs)和which疑问句是最难的,因为主语和宾语限定词短语(DP)上存在词汇限制,从而产生了干预效应。我们研究了意大利儿童对中心嵌套的带中心语宾语关系从句的理解,其中主语和宾语限定词短语上的数和性特征值是经过操控的。我们发现,数的条件总是比性的条件更准确,这表明干预效应对数短语内部结构敏感。我们提出了一个更精细的词汇限制定义,即外部和句法上活跃的特征(如数)会减少干预,而内部和(可能)词汇化的特征(如性)减少干预的程度较小。我们的结果也与一种记忆干扰方法相一致,在这种方法中,人类句法分析器对语言输入的高度特定属性敏感,比如基于线索的模型(范·戴克,2007)。

相似文献

2
Assessing Intervention Effects in Sentence Processing: Object Relatives vs. Subject Control.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;12:610909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610909. eCollection 2021.
3
Child Relativized Minimality and Grammaticality Judgement.
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 7;11:105. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00105. eCollection 2020.
4
Discourse accessibility constraints in children's processing of object relative clauses.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 23;6:860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00860. eCollection 2015.
5
Disambiguating information and memory resources in children's processing of Italian relative clauses.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2011 Apr;40(2):137-54. doi: 10.1007/s10936-010-9160-0.
6
Task-dependency and structure-dependency in number interference effects in sentence comprehension.
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 10;6:349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00349. eCollection 2015.
7
Comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition: a test for Relativized Minimality.
J Child Lang. 2015 May;42(3):618-61. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000257. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
8
In search for common patterns in aphasia: The case of Spanish wh-dependencies.
J Commun Disord. 2019 Nov-Dec;82:105924. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105924. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
10
The acquisition of Chinese relative clauses: contrasting two theoretical approaches.
J Child Lang. 2016 Jan;43(1):1-21. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000865. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Interference of Implicit Causality in Relative Clause Processing.
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Mar 3;9:364-400. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00193. eCollection 2025.
2
Relative clause comprehension in Cantonese-speaking children with and without developmental language disorder.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 7;18(11):e0288021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288021. eCollection 2023.
3
The Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Autism: The Role of Executive Functions and Language.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Dec;54(12):4394-4407. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-06159-4. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
5
The Reading Signatures of Agreement Attraction.
Open Mind (Camb). 2021 Nov 1;5:132-153. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00047. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessing Intervention Effects in Sentence Processing: Object Relatives vs. Subject Control.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;12:610909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610909. eCollection 2021.
7
Hierarchical structure and memory mechanisms in agreement attraction.
PLoS One. 2020 May 19;15(5):e0232163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232163. eCollection 2020.
8
Child Relativized Minimality and Grammaticality Judgement.
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 7;11:105. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00105. eCollection 2020.
10
Cognitive Predictors of Spoken Word Recognition in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorders.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jun 19;61(6):1409-1425. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0150.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account.
J Child Lang. 2011 Jan;38(1):141-65. doi: 10.1017/S0305000909990250. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
2
Rethinking child difficulty: the effect of NP type on children's processing of relative clauses in Hebrew.
J Child Lang. 2010 Jan;37(1):27-57. doi: 10.1017/S030500090900943X. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
3
Linking production and comprehension processes: the case of relative clauses.
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
4
Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension.
J Mem Lang. 2006 Aug;55(2):157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007.
5
Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):407-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.407.
6
Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: an ERP comparison.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jan;17(1):137-53. doi: 10.1162/0898929052880101.
7
The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development.
J Child Lang. 2004 Aug;31(3):661-81. doi: 10.1017/s0305000904006269.
9
A study of relative clauses in Williams syndrome.
J Child Lang. 2002 May;29(2):403-16. doi: 10.1017/s030500090200510x.
10
The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.
Cognition. 2002 Aug;85(1):79-112. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00087-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验