• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分子调查和遗传特征分析阿尔及利亚牛中的中央无形体、边缘无形体和牛无形体。

Molecular survey and genetic characterization of Anaplasma centrale, A. marginale and A. bovis in cattle from Algeria.

机构信息

Laboratoire de Parasitologie, École Nationale de Médecine Vétérinaire de Sidi Thabet, Institution de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur Agricoles, Univ. Manouba, Sidi Thabet, Tunisia.

Laboratoire de Parasitologie, Institut des Sciences Vétérinaire El Khroub, Université Frères Mentouri, Constantine 1, Algeria.

出版信息

Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Apr;65(2):456-464. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12725. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1111/tbed.12725
PMID:29034616
Abstract

Bovine anaplasmosis could be caused by several Anaplasma species. The causative agents are transmitted by ticks and haematophagous arthropods with a high impact on both human and animal health. This study was conducted to estimate the infection rate and to characterize Anaplasma spp. in cattle from Algeria. A molecular survey was performed in Setif district (Northeast Algeria) where a total number of 180 cattle blood samples were collected and tested for the presence of Anaplasma spp. by PCR. Positive samples were genetically characterized based on the 16S rRNA and msp4 genes. PCRs revealed that the infection rates of Anaplasma spp., Anaplasma centrale, Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma bovis were 42.2%; 39.4%; 11.1% and 4.4%, respectively. All tested animals were negative for A. phagocytophilum. Co-infection occurred in 10% (18/180) of the tested animals, and the most common co-infection pattern was an association between A. centrale and A. marginale (5.5%). Five cattle (2.7%) were co-infected by the three Anaplasma species. Holstein animals (58.1%) were more infected by A. centrale than the other breeds (p = .01). The molecular prevalence of A. centrale was significantly higher in males (54.2%) than in females (34.1%) (p = .001). A. marginale msp4 genetic analysis indicated a high sequence diversity of Algerian strains, suggesting the importation of live cattle from different origins. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of A. bovis and A. centrale revealed a low degree of genetic diversity. Our study suggests that different species of Anaplasma are simultaneously present in the Algerian cattle. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first molecular study and genetic characterization of Anaplasma spp. in Algerian cattle.

摘要

牛无浆体病可由几种无浆体属引起。病原体通过蜱和吸血节肢动物传播,对人类和动物健康都有重大影响。本研究旨在评估阿尔及利亚牛的感染率并对无浆体属进行特征描述。在塞提夫地区(阿尔及利亚东北部)进行了一项分子调查,共采集了 180 份牛血样进行无浆体属的 PCR 检测。根据 16S rRNA 和 msp4 基因对阳性样本进行了遗传特征分析。PCR 显示,无浆体属、中央无浆体、边缘无浆体和牛无浆体的感染率分别为 42.2%、39.4%、11.1%和 4.4%。所有检测的动物均为阴性。10%(18/180)的检测动物发生了混合感染,最常见的混合感染模式是中央无浆体和边缘无浆体的联合感染(5.5%)。有 5 头牛(2.7%)同时感染了三种无浆体属。荷斯坦牛(58.1%)比其他品种(p=.01)更易感染中央无浆体。雄性(54.2%)中央无浆体的分子流行率明显高于雌性(34.1%)(p=.001)。边缘无浆体 msp4 基因遗传分析表明,阿尔及利亚株具有很高的序列多样性,提示从不同来源进口了活牛。牛无浆体和中央无浆体的 16S rRNA 基因系统发育分析显示遗传多样性程度较低。本研究表明,不同种属的无浆体在阿尔及利亚牛中同时存在。据我们所知,这是首次对阿尔及利亚牛无浆体属进行的分子研究和遗传特征描述。

相似文献

1
Molecular survey and genetic characterization of Anaplasma centrale, A. marginale and A. bovis in cattle from Algeria.分子调查和遗传特征分析阿尔及利亚牛中的中央无形体、边缘无形体和牛无形体。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Apr;65(2):456-464. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12725. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
2
First molecular survey and novel genetic variants' identification of Anaplasma marginale, A. centrale and A. bovis in cattle from Tunisia.突尼斯牛中边缘无浆体、中央无浆体和牛无浆体的首次分子调查及新型基因变异体鉴定
Infect Genet Evol. 2015 Aug;34:361-71. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
3
Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale amongst transhumant cattle in north-eastern Uganda.分子检测和进化分析在乌干达东北部的游牧牛群中的边缘无浆体和中央无浆体。
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018 Mar;9(3):580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Molecular characterisation of Anaplasma species from African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in Kruger National Park, South Africa.南非克鲁格国家公园非洲水牛(非洲野水牛)体内无形体属物种的分子特征分析
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017 Mar;8(3):400-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
5
Spatio-temporal variations and genetic diversity of Anaplasma spp. in cattle from the North of Tunisia.突尼斯北部牛体内无形体属的时空变异和遗传多样性
Vet Microbiol. 2017 Sep;208:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
6
Co-infections with multiple genotypes of Anaplasma marginale in cattle indicate pathogen diversity.牛的边缘无浆体多种基因型的合并感染表明病原体的多样性。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Jan 3;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2595-5.
7
Molecular detection and characterization of Anaplasma spp. in sheep and cattle from Xinjiang, northwest China.中国西北部新疆地区绵羊和牛中无形体属的分子检测与特征分析
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Feb 19;8:108. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0727-3.
8
[Detection of Anaplasma / Ehrlichia Species of Cattle and Ticks in Aydın Region].[艾登地区牛和蜱中无形体/埃立克体属物种的检测]
Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2015 Dec;39(4):291-8. doi: 10.5152/tpd.2015.4525.
9
Differential identification of Anaplasma in cattle and potential of cattle to serve as reservoirs of Anaplasma capra, an emerging tick-borne zoonotic pathogen.牛类中无形体的差异鉴定及牛作为新兴蜱传动物源性人畜共患病病原体无形体的贮存宿主的潜力。
Vet Microbiol. 2018 Nov;226:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
10
Molecular characterization of South Indian field isolates of bovine Babesia spp. and Anaplasma spp.印度南部牛巴贝斯虫属和无形体属田间分离株的分子特征
Parasitol Res. 2019 Feb;118(2):617-630. doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-6172-4. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular Characterization of spp. in Cattle from Kazakhstan.哈萨克斯坦牛体内[具体物种名称]的分子特征分析 。(因原文中“ spp.”表述不完整,推测这里可能缺失具体物种名称)
Pathogens. 2024 Oct 12;13(10):894. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13100894.
2
Effects of cattle on vector-borne disease risk to humans: A systematic review.牛对人类媒介传播疾病风险的影响:系统评价。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Dec 19;17(12):e0011152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011152. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Molecular surveillance and genetic diversity of Anaplasma spp. in cattle (Bos taurus) and goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) from Hainan island/province, China.
中国海南岛/省牛(Bos taurus)和山羊(Capra aegagrus hircus)中无形体属(Anaplasma spp.)的分子监测和遗传多样性。
BMC Vet Res. 2023 Oct 18;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03766-2.
4
Molecular prevalence of spp. in cattle and assessment of associated risk factors in Northeast Thailand.泰国东北部牛体内 spp. 的分子流行率及相关风险因素评估。
Vet World. 2023 Aug;16(8):1702-1707. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.1702-1707. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
High diversity of spp., spp., and spp. in ticks from Yunnan Province, Southwest China.中国西南部云南省蜱虫中 spp.、spp. 和 spp. 的高度多样性。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 13;13:1008110. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1008110. eCollection 2022.
6
Serological and molecular surveys of spp. in Egyptian cattle reveal high infection prevalence.对埃及牛群中 spp. 的血清学和分子学调查显示感染率很高。
Iran J Vet Res. 2021 Fall;22(4):288-297. doi: 10.22099/ijvr.2021.40587.5879.
7
Screening and Analysis of Tunisian Isolates Reveal the Diversity of Phylogeographic Marker and the Conservation of OmpA Protein Vaccine Candidate.突尼斯分离株的筛选与分析揭示了系统发育地理标记的多样性以及外膜蛋白A候选疫苗的保守性。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 21;8:731200. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.731200. eCollection 2021.
8
Molecular detection of Theileria species, Anaplasma species, Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos, Trypanosoma evansi and first evidence of Theileria sinensis-associated bovine anaemia in crossbred Kedah-Kelantan x Brahman cattle.检测泰利虫属、无形体属、类支原体属、伊氏锥虫和无浆体属,以及杂交 Kedah-Kelantan 牛和婆罗门牛中与东方泰勒虫相关的牛贫血的首次证据
BMC Vet Res. 2021 Jul 18;17(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02902-0.
9
Bovines Harbor a Diverse Array of Vector-Borne Pathogens in Northeast Algeria.阿尔及利亚东北部的牛群携带多种媒介传播的病原体。
Pathogens. 2020 Oct 25;9(11):883. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9110883.
10
Molecular prevalence of emerging Anaplasma and Ehrlichia pathogens in apparently healthy dairy cattle in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya.肯尼亚内罗毕周边地区貌似健康的奶牛中新兴的嗜吞噬细胞无形体和埃立克体病原体的分子流行率。
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Sep 29;16(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02584-0.