Henry Rachael, Nantongo Lynda, Wagner Anita Katharina, Embrey Martha, Trap Birna
Management Sciences for Health, Plot 15, Princess Anne Drive, Bugolobi, P.O. Box 71419, Kampala, Uganda.
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 133 Brookline Avenue, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02215 USA.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Oct 11;10:33. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0121-y. eCollection 2017.
Supportive supervision has been found to be more effective than corrective fault-oriented inspections. Uganda's Ministry of Health in 2012 implemented a comprehensive strategy (SPARS) to build medicines management capacity in public sector health facilities. The approach includes supportive supervision. This structured observational study assesses supportive supervision competency among medicines management supervisors (MMS).
The study used structured observations of two groups of five purposely selected MMS-one group supervising facilities with greater medicines management improvement during one year of SPARS and one group with less improvement, based on quantitative metrics. We observed and scored behaviors and skills of supervisors in 11 categories deemed critical for effective and supportive supervision.
Supportive supervision was not evenly or adequately implemented, with the median supportive supervision competency score for all observed supervisors being 38%. Supervisors' main strengths were and (45%-47%). Their weakest areas were a and (17%), and most MMS were fair to strong in and MMS of facilities with little improvement in medicines management over time were weak in and . There was a 33 percentage point difference in the median supportive supervision competency scores between MMS of facilities with more versus less improvement (57%-24%) and a 77 percentage point difference in competency between the highest and lowest scoring MMS (77%-0%). We did not find a relationship between MMS experience (number of visits implemented) and their supportive supervision competency or facility improvement in medicines management. However, there is a likely relationship between supportive supervision competency and facility improvement.
Competency of MMS in supportive supervision among the sampled MMS was generally weak, but with much individual variation. Our results suggest that MMS' supportive supervision competency is positively related to the SPARS effectiveness scores of the facilities they supervise. We recommend strategies to strengthen supportive supervision behaviors and skills.
研究发现支持性监督比纠正性的以故障为导向的检查更有效。2012年,乌干达卫生部实施了一项全面战略(SPARS),以建设公共部门卫生设施的药品管理能力。该方法包括支持性监督。这项结构化观察研究评估了药品管理监督员(MMS)的支持性监督能力。
该研究对两组各五名特意挑选的MMS进行了结构化观察——一组监督在SPARS实施一年期间药品管理改善较大的设施,另一组监督改善较小的设施,这是基于定量指标进行的。我们观察并对监督员在11个被认为对有效和支持性监督至关重要的类别中的行为和技能进行了评分。
支持性监督未得到均匀或充分的实施,所有观察到的监督员的支持性监督能力得分中位数为38%。监督员的主要优势在于[具体优势内容缺失]和[具体优势内容缺失](45%-47%)。他们最薄弱的领域是[具体薄弱领域内容缺失]和[具体薄弱领域内容缺失](17%),大多数MMS在[具体方面内容缺失]和[具体方面内容缺失]方面表现为中等至较强。随着时间推移药品管理改善很少的设施的MMS在[具体方面内容缺失]和[具体方面内容缺失]方面较弱。药品管理改善较多与较少的设施的MMS之间,支持性监督能力得分中位数相差33个百分点(57%-24%),得分最高与最低的MMS之间能力相差77个百分点(77%-0%)。我们未发现MMS的经验(实施的访问次数)与其支持性监督能力或药品管理设施改善之间存在关联。然而,支持性监督能力与设施改善之间可能存在关联。
抽样的MMS中,MMS在支持性监督方面的能力总体较弱,但个体差异很大。我们的结果表明,MMS的支持性监督能力与他们所监督设施的SPARS有效性得分呈正相关。我们建议采取策略来加强支持性监督行为和技能。