Trap Birna, Kikule Kate, Vialle-Valentin Catherine, Musoke Richard, Lajul Grace Otto, Hoppenworth Kim, Konradsen Dorthe
Management Sciences for Health, Plot 15, Princess Anne Drive, Bugolobi, P.O. Box 71419, Kampala, Uganda.
National Drug Authority, Plot 46 - 48 Lumumba Avenue, Kampala, Uganda.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016 May 4;9:18. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0068-4. eCollection 2016.
Since its inception, the Uganda National Drug Authority (NDA) has regularly inspected private sector pharmacies to monitor adherence to Good Pharmacy Practices (GPP). This study reports findings from the first public facility inspections following an intervention (SPARS: Supervision, Performance Assessment, and Recognition Strategy) to build GPP and medicines management capacity in the public sector.
The study includes 455 public facilities: 417 facilities were inspected after at least four SPARS visits by trained managerial district staff (SPARS group), 38 before any exposure to SPARS. NDA inspectors measured 10 critical, 20 major, and 37 minor GPP indicators in every facility and only accredited facilities that passed all 10 critical and failed no more than 7 major indicators. Lack of compliance for a given indicator was defined as less than 75 % facilities passing that indicator. We assessed factors associated with certification using logistic regression analysis and compared number of failed indicators between the SPARS and comparative groups using two sample t-tests with equal or unequal variance.
57.4 % of inspected facilities obtained GPP certification: 57.1 % in the SPARS and 60.5 % in the comparative group (Adj. OR = 0.91, 95 % CI 0.45-1.85, p = 0.802). Overall, facilities failed an average of 10 indicators. SPARS facilities performed better than comparative facilities (9 (SD 6.1) vs. 13 (SD 7.7) failed indicators respectively; p = 0.017), and SPARS supported facilities scored better on indicators covered by SPARS. For all indicators but one minor, performance in the SPARS group was equal to or significantly better than in unsupervised facilities. Within the SPARS (intervention) group, certified facilities had < 75 % compliance on 7 indicators (all minor), and uncertified facilities on 19 (4 critical, 2 major, and 13 minor) indicators.
Half of the Ugandan population obtains medicines from the public sector. Yet, we found only 3/5 of inspected public health facilities meet GPP standards. SPARS facilities tended to perform better than unsupervised facilities, substantiating the value of supporting supervision interventions in GPP areas that need strengthening. None compliant indicators can be improved through practices and behavioral changes; some require infrastructure investments. We conclude that regular NDA inspections of public sector pharmacies in conjunction with interventions to improve GPP adherence can revolutionize patient care in Uganda.
自成立以来,乌干达国家药品管理局(NDA)定期对私营部门药店进行检查,以监测其对《良好药房规范》(GPP)的遵守情况。本研究报告了在一项旨在建设公共部门GPP和药品管理能力的干预措施(SPARS:监督、绩效评估和认可战略)之后首次对公共机构进行检查的结果。
该研究包括455个公共机构:417个机构在经过培训的管理区级工作人员进行至少四次SPARS访问后接受检查(SPARS组),38个机构在未接触任何SPARS措施之前接受检查。NDA检查员在每个机构中测量10项关键、20项主要和37项次要的GPP指标,只有通过所有10项关键指标且主要指标不合格不超过7项的机构才能获得认证。给定指标的合规性不足定义为通过该指标的机构少于75%。我们使用逻辑回归分析评估与认证相关的因素,并使用具有相等或不相等方差的两样本t检验比较SPARS组和对照组之间不合格指标的数量。
57.4%的受检机构获得了GPP认证:SPARS组为57.1%,对照组为60.5%(调整后的OR = 0.91,95% CI 0.45 - 1.85,p = 0.802)。总体而言,各机构平均有10项指标不合格。SPARS组的机构表现优于对照组(分别有9项(标准差6.1)和13项(标准差7.7)不合格指标;p = 0.017),并且得到SPARS支持的机构在SPARS涵盖的指标上得分更高。除一项次要指标外,对于所有指标,SPARS组的表现与未受监督的机构相当或显著更好。在SPARS(干预)组中,获得认证的机构在7项指标(均为次要指标)上的合规率低于75%,未获得认证的机构在19项指标(4项关键指标、2项主要指标和13项次要指标)上的合规率低于75%。
乌干达一半的人口从公共部门获取药品。然而,我们发现只有五分之三的受检公共卫生机构符合GPP标准。SPARS组的机构往往比未受监督的机构表现更好,这证实了在需要加强的GPP领域支持监督干预措施的价值。可以通过实践和行为改变来改进无合规指标;有些则需要基础设施投资。我们得出结论,NDA对公共部门药店进行定期检查并结合干预措施以提高对GPP的遵守情况,可以彻底改变乌干达的患者护理。