Jauhar Sameer, Nour Matthew M, Veronese Mattia, Rogdaki Maria, Bonoldi Ilaria, Azis Matilda, Turkheimer Federico, McGuire Philip, Young Allan H, Howes Oliver D
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, England.
Psychosis Clinical Academic Group, South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, England.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1206-1213. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2943.
The dopamine hypothesis suggests that dopamine abnormalities underlie psychosis, irrespective of diagnosis, implicating dopamine dysregulation in bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia, in line with the research domain criteria approach. However, this hypothesis has not been directly examined in individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychosis.
To test whether dopamine synthesis capacity is elevated in bipolar disorder with psychosis and how this compares with schizophrenia and matched controls and to examine whether dopamine synthesis capacity is associated with psychotic symptom severity, irrespective of diagnostic class.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional case-control positron emission tomographic study was performed in the setting of first-episode psychosis services in an inner-city area (London, England). Sixty individuals participated in the study (22 with bipolar psychosis [18 antipsychotic naive or free], 16 with schizophrenia [14 antipsychotic naive or free], and 22 matched controls) and underwent fluorodihydroxyphenyl-l-alanine ([18F]-DOPA) positron emission tomography to examine dopamine synthesis capacity. Standardized clinical measures, including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning, were administered. The study dates were March 2013 to November 2016.
Dopamine synthesis capacity (Kicer) and clinical measures (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning).
The mean (SD) ages of participants were 23.6 (3.6) years in 22 individuals with bipolar psychosis (13 male), 26.3 (4.4) years in 16 individuals with schizophrenia (14 male), and 24.5 (4.5) years in controls (14 male). There was a significant group difference in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity (Kicer) (F2,57 = 6.80, P = .002). Kicer was significantly elevated in both the bipolar group (mean [SD], 13.18 [1.08] × 10-3 min-1; P = .002) and the schizophrenia group (mean [SD], 12.94 [0.79] × 10-3 min-1; P = .04) compared with controls (mean [SD], 12.16 [0.92] × 10-3 min-1). There was no significant difference in striatal Kicer between the bipolar and schizophrenia groups. Kicer was significantly positively correlated with positive psychotic symptom severity in the combined bipolar and schizophrenia sample experiencing a current psychotic episode, explaining 27% of the variance in symptom severity (n = 32, r = 0.52, P = .003). There was a significant positive association between Kicer and positive psychotic symptom severity in individuals with bipolar disorder experiencing a current psychotic episode (n = 16, r = 0.60, P = .01), which remained significant after adjusting for manic symptom severity.
These findings are consistent with a transdiagnostic role for dopamine dysfunction in the pathoetiology of psychosis and suggest dopamine synthesis capacity as a potential novel drug target for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
多巴胺假说表明,无论诊断如何,多巴胺异常是精神病的基础,这意味着双相情感障碍和精神分裂症中存在多巴胺调节异常,这与研究领域标准方法一致。然而,该假说尚未在被诊断为伴有精神病的双相情感障碍患者中得到直接检验。
测试伴有精神病的双相情感障碍患者的多巴胺合成能力是否升高,以及与精神分裂症患者和匹配的对照组相比情况如何,并检查多巴胺合成能力是否与精神病症状严重程度相关,而不考虑诊断类别。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面病例对照正电子发射断层扫描研究在市中心地区(英国伦敦)的首发精神病服务机构中进行。60名个体参与了该研究(22名双相精神病患者[18名未使用过或停用抗精神病药物],16名精神分裂症患者[14名未使用过或停用抗精神病药物],以及22名匹配的对照组),并接受了氟代二羟基苯丙氨酸([18F]-DOPA)正电子发射断层扫描以检查多巴胺合成能力。采用了标准化临床测量方法,包括阳性和阴性症状量表、杨氏躁狂量表和功能总体评定量表。研究日期为2013年3月至2016年11月。
多巴胺合成能力(Kicer)和临床测量指标(阳性和阴性症状量表、杨氏躁狂量表和功能总体评定量表)。
22名双相精神病患者(13名男性)的平均(标准差)年龄为23.6(3.6)岁,16名精神分裂症患者(14名男性)的平均(标准差)年龄为26.3(4.4)岁,对照组(14名男性)的平均(标准差)年龄为24.5(4.5)岁。纹状体多巴胺合成能力(Kicer)存在显著的组间差异(F2,57 = 6.80,P = 0.002)。与对照组(平均[标准差],12.16[0.92]×10-3 min-1)相比,双相情感障碍组(平均[标准差],13.18[1.08]×10-3 min-1;P = 0.002)和精神分裂症组(平均[标准差],12.94[0.79]×10-3 min-1;P = 0.04)的Kicer均显著升高。双相情感障碍组和精神分裂症组之间的纹状体Kicer无显著差异。在当前经历精神病发作的双相情感障碍和精神分裂症合并样本中,Kicer与阳性精神病症状严重程度显著正相关,解释了症状严重程度变异的27%(n = 32,r = 0.52,P = 0.003)。在当前经历精神病发作的双相情感障碍患者中(n = 16,r = 0.60,P = 0.01),Kicer与阳性精神病症状严重程度存在显著正相关,在调整躁狂症状严重程度后仍显著。
这些发现与多巴胺功能障碍在精神病病因学中的跨诊断作用一致,并表明多巴胺合成能力可能是双相情感障碍和精神分裂症的一个潜在新型药物靶点。