应用离散选择实验评估癌症青少年和年轻患者的依从性相关动机。
Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Assess Adherence-Related Motivation Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.
机构信息
Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
出版信息
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Mar 1;43(2):172-184. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx104.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To develop and pilot test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess the specific factors likely to motivate a given adolescent or young adult with cancer to adhere to medications included in treatment protocols.
METHODS
A multimethod and iterative approach was used. Twenty adolescents and young adults with cancer participated in DCE pilot testing and refinement. Hierarchical Bayes was used to estimate attribute and attribute-level preference scores for each participant.
RESULTS
The final DCE included nine choice sets composed of four attributes. The resulting DCE was modified with feedback from 20 adolescents and young adults (M[SD] age = 18.66 [2.95]) with cancer. The DCE was understandable and relevant. The factors likely to motivate adolescents and young adults with cancer to be adherent differed across individuals.
CONCLUSIONS
DCEs including the measure developed in this manuscript offer a novel approach to understanding individual-level differences critical for informing adherence-promotion efforts.
摘要
目的
开发并试点测试一项离散选择实验（DCE），以评估可能促使特定癌症青少年或青年患者坚持治疗方案中包含的药物的具体因素。
方法
采用多方法和迭代方法。20 名癌症青少年和年轻人参与了 DCE 的试点测试和改进。分层贝叶斯用于估计每个参与者的属性和属性级别偏好得分。
结果
最终的 DCE 包括由四个属性组成的九个选择集。根据 20 名癌症青少年和年轻人（M[SD]年龄=18.66 [2.95]）的反馈对 DCE 进行了修改。DCE 易于理解且相关。可能促使癌症青少年和年轻人坚持治疗的因素因个体而异。
结论
包括本文中开发的测量方法在内的 DCE 为理解关键的个体差异提供了一种新方法，这些差异对于告知坚持治疗的努力至关重要。
相似文献
1
Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Assess Adherence-Related Motivation Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.应用离散选择实验评估癌症青少年和年轻患者的依从性相关动机。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Mar 1;43(2):172-184. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx104.
2
Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?生存还是死亡：风险属性框架是否会影响离散选择实验中的决策行为？
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
3
Development of a Discrete-Choice Experiment (DCE) to Elicit Adolescent and Parent Preferences for Hypodontia Treatment.开发离散选择实验（DCE）以了解青少年和家长对缺牙治疗的偏好。
Patient. 2019 Feb;12(1):137-148. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0338-0.
4
Preferences for medication attributes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK.英国 2 型糖尿病患者对药物属性的偏好。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Sep;15(9):802-9. doi: 10.1111/dom.12091. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
5
Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.属性框架在离散选择实验中是否会影响支付意愿？结直肠癌筛查中离散选择实验的结果。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):354-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00417.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
6
Qualitative Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment for Physical Activity Interventions to Improve Knee Osteoarthritis.用于改善膝关节骨关节炎的身体活动干预离散选择实验的定性发展
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;98(6):1210-1216.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
7
Lost in the crowd? Using eye-tracking to investigate the effect of complexity on attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments.淹没在人群中？利用眼动追踪技术研究复杂性对离散选择实验中属性非关注的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Feb 3;16:14. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0251-1.
8
A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.一项探索 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态偏好的初步离散选择实验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):287-98. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0035-z.
9
Novel application of discrete choice experiment methodology to understand how clinicians around the world triage palliative care needs: A research protocol.离散选择实验方法在全球临床医生如何分诊姑息治疗需求方面的新应用：研究方案。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Feb;17(1):66-73. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000913. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
10
Individual preferences for physical exercise as secondary prevention for non-specific low back pain: A discrete choice experiment.针对非特异性下腰痛二级预防的体育锻炼个人偏好：一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):e0187709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187709. eCollection 2017.
引用本文的文献
1
Facilitators and barriers to adherence to medical recommendations among adolescents with cancer: A systematic review.癌症青少年遵守医学建议的促进因素和障碍：一项系统综述。
J Child Health Care. 2025 Jun;29(2):501-522. doi: 10.1177/13674935231208502. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
2
Predictors of objective treatment adherence in adolescents with epilepsy: The important role of motivation.预测青少年癫痫患者客观治疗依从性的因素：动机的重要作用。
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 May;142:109192. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109192. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
3
Understanding Adolescent and Young Adult 6-Mercaptopurine Adherence and mHealth Engagement During Cancer Treatment: Protocol for Ecological Momentary Assessment.了解青少年和青年癌症患者在治疗期间对6-巯基嘌呤的依从性及移动健康参与度：生态瞬时评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 22;10(10):e32789. doi: 10.2196/32789.
4
Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.应答者理解在离散选择实验中的应用：范围综述。
Patient. 2021 Jan;14(1):17-53. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00467-y. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
Pediatric Psychosocial Standards of Care in action: Research that bridges the gap from need to implementation.儿科心理社会护理标准的实践：弥合从需求到实施差距的研究。
Psychooncology. 2020 Dec;29(12):2033-2040. doi: 10.1002/pon.5505. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Adherence to Multiple Treatment Recommendations in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: A Mixed Methods, Multi-Informant Investigation.青少年和青年癌症患者对多项治疗建议的依从性：一项混合方法、多信息源调查。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020 Dec;9(6):651-661. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0013. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Understanding adolescent and parent acceptability and feasibility experience in a large Type 1 diabetes mellitus behavioural trial.理解大型 1 型糖尿病行为试验中青少年和家长的可接受性和可行性经验。
Diabet Med. 2020 Jul;37(7):1134-1145. doi: 10.1111/dme.13913. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
本文引用的文献
1
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法：药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
2
Medication adherence decision-making among adolescents and young adults with cancer.癌症青少年和青年的用药依从性决策
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
3
Systemic Exposure to Thiopurines and Risk of Relapse in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Children's Oncology Group Study.硫嘌呤类药物全身暴露与儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病复发风险：儿童肿瘤学组研究。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):287-95. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0245.
4
Age-related changes in the intrinsic functional connectivity of the human ventral vs. dorsal striatum from childhood to middle age.从童年到中年，人类腹侧与背侧纹状体内在功能连接的年龄相关变化。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Feb;11:83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
5
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验：文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
6
A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.一项出声思考研究，比较离散选择法和最佳-最差标度法的有效性和可接受性。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 23;9(4):e90635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090635. eCollection 2014.
7
Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).基因组医学中偶发发现的返还：衡量患者重视的内容——开发一种用于衡量下一代检测信息偏好的工具（IMPRINT）。
Genet Med. 2013 Nov;15(11):873-81. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.63. Epub 2013 May 30.
8
Incentive Motivation, Cognitive Control, and the Adolescent Brain: Is It Time for a Paradigm Shift?激励动机、认知控制与青少年大脑：是时候进行范式转变了吗？
Child Dev Perspect. 2012 Dec 1;6(4):392-399. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00252.x. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
9
Nominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosis.用于离散选择实验属性选择的名义组技术：骨质疏松症药物治疗选择的一个例子
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:133-9. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S38408. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
10
Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.构建离散选择实验的实验设计：ISPOR 联合分析实验设计良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.
Zotero 插件