Suppr超能文献

新手和学员达到腹腔镜技能熟练程度的学习曲线的系统评价:虚拟现实模拟器与箱式训练器的比较

A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves of Novices and Trainees to Achieve Proficiency in Laparoscopic Skills: Virtual Reality Simulator Versus Box Trainer.

作者信息

Selva Raj Dharshanan Raj, Kumar Shaarven, Nallathamby Kasthuri, Raj Kisshan, Hristova Marta

机构信息

Plastic Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, GBR.

Internal Medicine, Stepping Hill Hospital, Manchester, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 3;16(11):e72923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72923. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery, established in the 1980s, has become a primary treatment method across various surgical specialities due to its advantages over open surgery, including shorter recovery times and fewer complications. Mastery of laparoscopic skills is essential for novice and junior trainees, who must develop hand-eye coordination, depth perception, and instrument handling. This systematic review examines the learning curves of novices using box trainers compared to those using virtual reality (VR) simulators to attain proficiency in laparoscopic skills. The learning curves are assessed through metrics such as the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS), and the Global Rating Scale (GRS) based on the time taken to complete specific tasks. A systematic review was conducted to examine the learning curves of novices in achieving proficiency in laparoscopic skills. An extensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted using keywords like laparoscopic surgery, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), virtual reality (VR), box trainers, and simulation. Thirteen articles were reviewed and analysed in this study. The analysis of data from these papers, along with subsequent meta-analyses, revealed no significant differences in the learning curves of trainees using VR simulators compared to those using box trainers. Variability in conclusions among studies arose from differences in assessment methods and parameters. Overall, there is no consensus on which training modality yields a steeper learning curve. The systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 studies concluded that there was no notable difference in the learning curves of trainees using VR simulators compared to those using box trainers. It suggests the need for standardized assessment methods and parameters across studies. Generally, box trainers are preferred for mastering core laparoscopic skills like knot tying and suturing, while VR simulators are more effective for teaching specific surgical procedures, such as cholecystectomy and hemicolectomy.

摘要

腹腔镜手术始于20世纪80年代,由于其相对于开放手术具有恢复时间短和并发症少等优势,已成为各外科专科的主要治疗方法。掌握腹腔镜技术对于新手和初级学员至关重要,他们必须培养手眼协调能力、深度感知能力和器械操作能力。本系统评价研究了新手使用箱式训练器与使用虚拟现实(VR)模拟器来熟练掌握腹腔镜技术的学习曲线。通过诸如客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)、腹腔镜技能整体手术评估(GOALS)以及基于完成特定任务所需时间的整体评分量表(GRS)等指标来评估学习曲线。进行了一项系统评价,以研究新手在熟练掌握腹腔镜技术方面的学习曲线。使用腹腔镜手术、微创手术(MIS)、虚拟现实(VR)、箱式训练器和模拟等关键词在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane上进行了广泛的文献检索。本研究共纳入并分析了13篇文章。对这些论文的数据进行分析以及后续的荟萃分析表明,与使用箱式训练器的学员相比,使用VR模拟器的学员在学习曲线上没有显著差异。研究结论的差异源于评估方法和参数的不同。总体而言,对于哪种训练方式会产生更陡峭的学习曲线尚无共识。对13项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析得出结论,与使用箱式训练器的学员相比,使用VR模拟器的学员在学习曲线上没有显著差异。这表明需要在各项研究中采用标准化的评估方法和参数。一般来说,箱式训练器更适合用于掌握打结和缝合等核心腹腔镜技术,而VR模拟器在教授特定的外科手术(如胆囊切除术和半结肠切除术)方面更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc0/11614029/bc25bcaf2840/cureus-0016-00000072923-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验