Kwasny Michelle N, Caine Kelly E, Rogers Wendy A, Fisk Arthur D
School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 801 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA.
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2008;2008:3291-3296. doi: 10.1145/1358628.1358846.
In this paper we present preliminary results from a study of individual differences in privacy beliefs, as well as relate folk definitions of privacy to extant privacy theory. Focus groups were conducted with young adults aged 18-28 and older adults aged 65-75. Participants first shared their individual definitions of privacy, followed by a discussion of privacy in six scenarios chosen to represent a range of potentially invasive situations. Taken together, Westin's and Altman's theories of privacy accounted for both younger and older adults' ideas about privacy, however, neither theory successfully accounted for findings across all age and gender groups. Whereas males tended to think of privacy in terms of personal needs and convenience, females focused more on privacy in terms of others, respecting privacy rights, and safety. Older adults tended to be more concerned about privacy of space rather than information privacy. Initial results reinforce the notion that targeting HCI design to the user population, even with respect to privacy, is critically important.
在本文中,我们展示了一项关于隐私信念个体差异研究的初步结果,并将民间对隐私的定义与现有的隐私理论联系起来。我们对18 - 28岁的年轻人和65 - 75岁的老年人进行了焦点小组访谈。参与者首先分享了他们对隐私的个人定义,随后讨论了六个场景中的隐私问题,这些场景旨在代表一系列潜在的侵犯性情况。总体而言,韦斯汀和奥特曼的隐私理论解释了年轻人和老年人对隐私的看法,然而,这两种理论都未能成功解释所有年龄和性别群体的研究结果。男性倾向于从个人需求和便利的角度考虑隐私问题,而女性则更关注他人方面的隐私、尊重隐私权以及安全问题。老年人往往更关心空间隐私而非信息隐私。初步结果强化了这样一种观念,即针对用户群体进行人机交互设计,即使是在隐私方面,也至关重要。