IfADo, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):935-950. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0931-1. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
We previously investigated sensory coupling of the sensed positions of cursor and hand in a cursor-control task and found differential characteristics of implicit and explicit measures of the bias of sensed hand position toward the position of the cursor. The present study further tested whether adaptation to a visuomotor rotation differentially affects these two measures. Participants made center-out reaching movements to remembered targets while looking at a rotated feedback cursor. After sets of practice trials with constant (adaptation condition) or random (control condition) visuomotor rotations, test trials served to assess sensory coupling. In these trials, participants judged the position of the hand at the end of the center-out movement, and the deviation of these judgments from the physical hand positions served as explicit measure of the bias of sensed hand position toward the position of the cursor, whereas the implicit measure was based on the direction of the return movement. The results showed that inter-individual variability of explicitly assessed biases of sensed hand position toward the cursor position was less in the adaptation condition than in the control condition. Conversely, no such changes were observed for the implicit measure of the bias of sensed hand position, revealing contrasting effects of adaptation on the explicit and implicit measures. These results suggest that biases of explicitly sensed hand position reflect sensory coupling of neural representations that are altered by visuomotor adaptation. In contrast, biases of implicitly sensed hand position reflect sensory coupling of neural representations that are unaffected by adaptation.
我们之前研究了在光标控制任务中光标和手的感知位置的感觉耦合,发现了隐性和显性测量手感知位置偏向光标位置的偏差的不同特征。本研究进一步测试了适应视动旋转是否会对这两种测量方法产生不同的影响。参与者在观看旋转反馈光标时进行指向中心的向外运动。在具有恒定(适应条件)或随机(对照条件)视动旋转的练习试验集之后,测试试验用于评估感觉耦合。在这些试验中,参与者判断中心外运动结束时手的位置,这些判断与实际手位置的偏差作为感知手位置偏向光标位置的显性测量,而隐性测量则基于返回运动的方向。结果表明,适应条件下感知手位置偏向光标位置的显性评估偏差的个体间可变性小于对照条件。相反,对于感知手位置的隐性测量,没有观察到这种变化,这表明适应对显性和隐性测量有相反的影响。这些结果表明,显性感知手位置的偏差反映了受视动适应改变的神经表示的感觉耦合。相比之下,隐性感知手位置的偏差反映了不受适应影响的神经表示的感觉耦合。