• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明知故犯,却难以纠正:这是最优表现的一个例子。

Knowing each random error of our ways, but hardly correcting for it: an instance of optimal performance.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany ; Cognitive Interaction Technology Center of Excellence, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e78757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078757. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0078757
PMID:24205308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3813602/
Abstract

Random errors are omnipresent in sensorimotor tasks due to perceptual and motor noise. The question is, are humans aware of their random errors on an instance-by-instance basis? The appealing answer would be 'no' because it seems intuitive that humans would otherwise immediately correct for the errors online, thereby increasing sensorimotor precision. However, here we show the opposite. Participants pointed to visual targets with varying degree of feedback. After movement completion participants indicated whether they believed they landed left or right of target. Surprisingly, participants' left/right-discriminability was well above chance, even without visual feedback. Only when forced to correct for the error after movement completion did participants loose knowledge about the remaining error, indicating that random errors can only be accessed offline. When correcting, participants applied the optimal correction gain, a weighting factor between perceptual and motor noise, minimizing end-point variance. Together these results show that humans optimally combine direct information about sensorimotor noise in the system (the current random error), with indirect knowledge about the variance of the perceptual and motor noise distributions. Yet, they only appear to do so offline after movement completion, not while the movement is still in progress, suggesting that during movement proprioceptive information is less precise.

摘要

由于感知和运动噪声的存在,感觉运动任务中存在着无处不在的随机误差。问题是,人类是否能逐个实例地意识到自己的随机误差?一个吸引人的答案是“否”,因为直观地说,人类否则会立即在线纠正错误,从而提高感觉运动精度。然而,在这里我们展示的是相反的情况。参与者用不同程度的反馈指向视觉目标。运动完成后,参与者指出他们是否认为自己的落点在目标的左侧或右侧。令人惊讶的是,参与者的左右分辨能力明显高于随机水平,即使没有视觉反馈也是如此。只有在运动完成后被迫纠正错误时,参与者才会失去对剩余错误的了解,这表明随机错误只能离线访问。在进行纠正时,参与者应用了最佳的纠正增益,即感知和运动噪声之间的权重因子,以最小化端点方差。这些结果表明,人类最优地结合了系统中关于感觉运动噪声的直接信息(当前的随机误差),以及关于感知和运动噪声分布方差的间接知识。然而,它们似乎只在运动完成后离线进行,而不是在运动进行时进行,这表明在运动过程中本体感觉信息不太准确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/02ef18e4ecad/pone.0078757.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/33ff6c3cd16f/pone.0078757.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/7157d676e73f/pone.0078757.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/952a36792e6c/pone.0078757.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/69bbfc3aea8f/pone.0078757.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/02ef18e4ecad/pone.0078757.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/33ff6c3cd16f/pone.0078757.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/7157d676e73f/pone.0078757.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/952a36792e6c/pone.0078757.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/69bbfc3aea8f/pone.0078757.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50ba/3813602/02ef18e4ecad/pone.0078757.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowing each random error of our ways, but hardly correcting for it: an instance of optimal performance. 明知故犯,却难以纠正:这是最优表现的一个例子。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e78757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078757. eCollection 2013.
2
Optimal sensorimotor control in eye movement sequences.眼球运动序列中的最佳感觉运动控制。
J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 11;29(10):3026-35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1169-08.2009.
3
Kinematic markers dissociate error correction from sensorimotor realignment during prism adaptation.运动学标志物在棱镜适应过程中分离了错误校正和感觉运动重新校准。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Mar;55:15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
4
Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics.视觉引导抓握的校准由纠错学习和内部动力学驱动。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):3057-69. doi: 10.1152/jn.00897.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
5
Intermittent visual feedback can boost motor learning of rhythmic movements: evidence for error feedback beyond cycles.间歇性视觉反馈可以促进节奏运动的运动学习:超越周期的错误反馈证据。
J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 11;32(2):653-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4230-11.2012.
6
Alteration of a motor learning rule under mirror-reversal transformation does not depend on the amplitude of visual error.在镜像反转变换下运动学习规则的改变并不取决于视觉误差的幅度。
Neurosci Res. 2015 May;94:62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy.本体感觉丧失与人类手臂运动的感知、控制和学习:来自感觉神经元病的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Aug;236(8):2137-2155. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5289-0. Epub 2018 May 19.
8
Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.左手的编程利用任务集,而右手的编程则取决于近期经历。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jul;235(7):2215-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4964-x. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
9
Target Uncertainty Mediates Sensorimotor Error Correction.目标不确定性介导感觉运动误差校正。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170466. eCollection 2017.
10
The effect of saccade metrics on the corollary discharge contribution to perceived eye location.扫视指标对视觉感知眼位置的推论性放电贡献的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 May 1;113(9):3312-22. doi: 10.1152/jn.00771.2014. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control.延迟适应不会在离散的按键动作和连续控制之间转移。
Iperception. 2025 Jul 2;16(4):20416695251352067. doi: 10.1177/20416695251352067. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Sensorimotor adaptation impedes perturbation detection in grasping.感觉运动适应会妨碍抓握过程中的扰动检测。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):373-386. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02543-y. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

本文引用的文献

1
Where was my arm again? Memory-based matching of proprioceptive targets is enhanced by increased target presentation time.我的手臂在哪里?基于记忆的本体感受目标匹配通过增加目标呈现时间而增强。
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Aug 30;481(1):54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.053. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
2
Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.反馈和状态估计的不确定性决定了运动适应的速度。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2010 May 11;4:11. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00011. eCollection 2010.
3
Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.
是我做的吗?在伸手抓取任务中检测视觉反馈的扰动。
J Vis. 2019 Jan 2;19(1):5. doi: 10.1167/19.1.5.
4
Contrasting effects of adaptation to a visuomotor rotation on explicit and implicit measures of sensory coupling.适应视动旋转对感觉耦合的内隐和外显测量的对比影响。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):935-950. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0931-1. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Target Uncertainty Mediates Sensorimotor Error Correction.目标不确定性介导感觉运动误差校正。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170466. eCollection 2017.
6
Haptic adaptation to slant: No transfer between exploration modes.触觉适应倾斜:探索模式之间无转移。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 4;6:34412. doi: 10.1038/srep34412.
7
Continuous psychophysics: Target-tracking to measure visual sensitivity.连续心理物理学:用于测量视觉敏感度的目标追踪法。
J Vis. 2015 Mar 20;15(3):14. doi: 10.1167/15.3.14.
运动学习会根据运动噪声的特性进行最优调整。
Neuron. 2009 Aug 13;63(3):406-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.025.
4
The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching.人类伸手动作中适应速率的统计决定因素。
J Vis. 2008 Apr 23;8(4):20.1-19. doi: 10.1167/8.4.20.
5
Noise in the nervous system.神经系统中的噪音。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303. doi: 10.1038/nrn2258.
6
Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability.对与任务相关的运动变异性变化的最佳补偿。
J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 3;25(31):7169-78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1906-05.2005.
7
Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee.皮肤感受器有助于食指、肘部和膝盖的动觉。
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1699-706. doi: 10.1152/jn.00191.2005. Epub 2005 May 25.
8
Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.感觉运动学习中的贝叶斯整合
Nature. 2004 Jan 15;427(6971):244-7. doi: 10.1038/nature02169.
9
System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.应用于视觉运动任务的系统识别:在嘈杂变化任务中的接近最优人类表现。
J Neurosci. 2003 Apr 1;23(7):3066-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-03066.2003.
10
Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?小脑是一个史密斯预估器吗?
J Mot Behav. 1993 Sep;25(3):203-16. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1993.9942050.