Perchtold Corinna M, Papousek Ilona, Koschutnig Karl, Rominger Christian, Weber Hannelore, Weiss Elisabeth M, Fink Andreas
Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jan;39(1):393-406. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23851. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
The investigation of neurocognitive processes underlying more real-life creative behavior is among the greatest challenges in creativity research. In this fMRI study, we addressed this issue by investigating functional patterns of brain activity while participants were required to be creative in an affective context. Affective creativity was assessed in terms of individual's inventiveness in generating alternative appraisals for anger-evoking events, which has recently emerged as a new ability concept in cognitive reappraisal research. In addition, a classic divergent thinking task was administered. Both creativity tasks yielded strong activation in left prefrontal regions, indicating their shared cognitive processing demands like the inhibition of prepotent responses, shifting between different perspectives and controlled memory retrieval. Regarding task-specific differences, classic creative ideation activated a characteristic divergent thinking network comprising the left supramarginal, inferior temporal, and inferior frontal gyri. Affective creativity on the other hand specifically recruited the right superior frontal gyrus, presumably involved in the postretrieval monitoring of reappraisal success, and core hubs of the default-mode network, which are also implicated in social cognition. As a whole, by taking creativity research to the realm of emotion, this study advances our understanding of how more real-life creativity is rooted in the brain. Hum Brain Mapp 39:393-406, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
探究现实生活中更具创造性行为背后的神经认知过程是创造力研究中最大的挑战之一。在这项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中,我们通过在情感背景下要求参与者发挥创造力时,研究大脑活动的功能模式来解决这个问题。情感创造力是根据个体在为引发愤怒的事件生成替代性评价时的创造力来评估的,这最近已成为认知重评研究中的一个新能力概念。此外,还进行了一项经典的发散思维任务。两项创造力任务均在左前额叶区域产生强烈激活,表明它们具有共同的认知加工需求,如抑制优势反应、在不同视角之间转换以及控制性记忆检索。关于任务特定差异,经典的创造性构思激活了一个由左缘上回、颞下回和额下回组成的特征性发散思维网络。另一方面,情感创造力特别激活了右额上回,可能参与了对重评成功的检索后监测,以及默认模式网络的核心枢纽,这些也与社会认知有关。总体而言,通过将创造力研究带入情感领域,本研究推进了我们对现实生活中更多创造力如何根植于大脑的理解。《人类大脑图谱》39:393 - 406,2018年。© 2017威利期刊公司