• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人独立生活准备程度地板转移测试的信度和效度。

Reliability and Validity of the Floor Transfer Test as a Measure of Readiness for Independent Living Among Older Adults.

机构信息

Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, Utah.

Visiting Nurse Service of New York (VNSNY) Home Care, Brooklyn, New York.

出版信息

J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):136-147. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000142.

DOI:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000142
PMID:29059121
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The ability to get up from the floor after a fall is a basic skill required for functional independence. Consequently, the inability to safely get down to and up from the floor or to perform a floor transfer (FT) may indicate decreased mobility and/or increased frailty. A reliable and valid test of FT ability is a critical part of the clinical decision-making process. The FT test is a simple, performance-based test that can be administered quickly and easily to determine a patient's ability to safely and successfully get down and up from the floor using any movement strategy and without time restriction. The primary purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the intrarater reliability and validity of the FT test as a practical alternative to several widely used yet time-consuming measures of physical disability, frailty, and functional mobility.

METHODS

A total of 61 community-dwelling older adults (65-96 years of age) participated in the study, divided into 2 separate subsamples: intrarater reliability was studied with 15 participants, while concurrent validity was studied with the remaining 46 participants. In both subsamples, the participants were stratified on the basis of the self-reported levels of FT ability as independent, assisted, and dependent. Intrarater reliability was assessed on 2 separate occasions and scores were analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient and κ statistics. Concurrent validity of the FT test was assessed against the self-reported FT ability questionnaire, Physical Functioning Scale, Phenotype of Physical Frailty, and the Short Physical Performance Battery. Known-groups validity was tested by determining whether the FT test distinguished between (1) community-dwelling older adults with physical disabilities versus those without physical disabilities; and (2) community-dwelling older adults who were functionally dependent versus those who were independent. Participants were also categorized on the basis of FT test outcome as independent, assisted, or dependent. The Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the strength of the relationships between the FT test and physical status measures. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine whether the FT test significantly discriminated between groups as categorized by the Physical Functioning Scale and Short Physical Performance Battery, and to examine the significance level of the sociodemographic data across the 3 FT test outcome groups.

RESULTS

The intrarater reliabilities of the measures were good (0.73-1.00). There were statistically positive and strong correlations between the FT test and all physical status measures (ρ ranged from 0.86 to 0.93, P < .001). Older adults who passed the FT test were collectively categorized as those without physical disabilities and functionally independent, whereas older adults who failed the FT test were categorized as those with physical disabilities and functionally dependent (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The FT test is a reliable and valid measure for screening for physical disability, frailty, and functional mobility. It can determine which older adults have physical disabilities and/or functional dependence and hence may be useful in assessing readiness for independent living. Inclusion of the FT test at initial evaluation may reveal the presence of these conditions and address the safety of older adults in the community.

摘要

背景与目的

从地板上站起来的能力是实现功能独立所需的基本技能。因此,无法安全地从地板上下到或从地板上转移(FT),可能表明移动能力下降和/或脆弱性增加。可靠且有效的 FT 能力测试是临床决策过程的关键部分。FT 测试是一项简单的基于表现的测试,可以快速轻松地进行,以确定患者使用任何运动策略并在没有时间限制的情况下安全且成功地从地板上下到或从地板上转移的能力。本横断面研究的主要目的是确定 FT 测试的内部信度和有效性,作为几种广泛使用但耗时的身体残疾、脆弱性和功能性移动性测量的实用替代方法。

方法

共有 61 名居住在社区的老年人(65-96 岁)参加了这项研究,分为 2 个独立的样本:15 名参与者进行了内部信度研究,其余 46 名参与者进行了同时效性研究。在这两个样本中,根据自我报告的 FT 能力水平将参与者分层为独立、辅助和依赖。内部信度在 2 个不同的场合进行评估,并通过组内相关系数和κ统计分析评分。FT 测试的同时效性评估与自我报告的 FT 能力问卷、身体功能量表、身体虚弱表型和简短身体表现电池进行比较。通过确定 FT 测试是否区分(1)有身体残疾的居住在社区的老年人与没有身体残疾的老年人;和(2)有功能性依赖的居住在社区的老年人与无功能性依赖的老年人,测试了 FT 测试的已知组有效性。还根据 FT 测试结果将参与者分为独立、辅助或依赖。计算 Spearman 相关系数以检查 FT 测试与身体状况测量之间的关系强度。Kruskal-Wallis 检验用于确定 FT 测试是否根据身体功能量表和简短身体表现电池对分组进行显著区分,并检查 3 个 FT 测试结果组中社会人口统计学数据的显著性水平。

结果

测量的内部信度良好(0.73-1.00)。FT 测试与所有身体状况测量均呈正相关且具有统计学意义(ρ范围为 0.86 至 0.93,P<.001)。通过 FT 测试的老年人被归类为没有身体残疾和功能独立的人,而未通过 FT 测试的老年人被归类为有身体残疾和功能依赖的人(P<.001)。

结论

FT 测试是一种可靠且有效的筛查身体残疾、脆弱性和功能性移动性的方法。它可以确定哪些老年人有身体残疾和/或功能依赖,因此可能有助于评估独立生活的准备情况。在初始评估中包含 FT 测试可以揭示这些情况的存在,并解决社区中老年人的安全问题。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Floor Transfer Test as a Measure of Readiness for Independent Living Among Older Adults.老年人独立生活准备程度地板转移测试的信度和效度。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):136-147. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000142.
2
Characteristics of Older Adults Who Are Unable to Perform a Floor Transfer: Considerations for Clinical Decision-Making.无法进行地面转移的老年人的特征:临床决策的考虑因素。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2020 Apr/Jun;43(2):62-70. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000189.
3
The Relationship Between Performance of Sit-To-Stand From a Chair and Getting Down and Up From the Floor in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.社区居住的老年人从椅子上站起和从地板上站起/坐下的能力之间的关系。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Jun;38(6):818-829. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1802796. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
4
The community balance and mobility scale alleviates the ceiling effects observed in the currently used gait and balance assessments for the community-dwelling older adults.社区平衡与移动量表减轻了目前用于社区居住老年人步态和平衡评估中所观察到的天花板效应。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015 Apr-Jun;38(2):78-89. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000024.
5
Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Assessing Stair Function in Older Adults.台阶测试评估(STEPS):评估老年人的楼梯功能。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2024;47(4):214-221. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000415. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
6
Assessment of frailty in Saudi community-dwelling older adults: validation of measurements.沙特社区居住老年人的衰弱评估:测量方法的验证
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):197-204. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.197. Epub 2019 May 30.
7
Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Its Short Versions in Older Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study.老年癌症幸存者平衡评估系统测试及其简化版本的信度、效度和最小可检测变化:一项试点研究。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016 Apr-Jun;39(2):58-63. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000047.
8
[Impact of fall risk and fear of falling on mobility of independently living senior citizens transitioning to frailty: screening results concerning fall prevention in the community].[跌倒风险和跌倒恐惧对向虚弱转变的独立生活老年人活动能力的影响:社区预防跌倒的筛查结果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Aug;40(4):255-67. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0473-z.
9
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the FRAIL Scale in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults.FRAIL 量表在中国社区居住的老年人中的跨文化调适和验证。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
10
Development of a Screening Tool for Oral Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.社区居住的老年人口腔衰弱筛查工具的开发:一项横断面研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Sep;25(9):105171. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105171. Epub 2024 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Falls Efficacy in Seniors: Important Insights in Hospital and Community Settings.评估老年人跌倒效能:医院和社区环境中的重要见解
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2025 Mar 1;10(1):48-53. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-10-048. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
The Reliability and Validity of the Lie-to-Sit-to-Stand-to-Walk Transfer (LSSWT) Test in Knee Osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎中从仰卧到坐再到站再行走转移(LSSWT)测试的信度和效度
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Dec 20;57(2):290-296. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00802-5. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Essential amino acid enriched meal replacement improves body composition and physical function in obese older adults: A randomized controlled trial.
富含必需氨基酸的代餐改善肥胖老年人体成分和身体功能:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Oct;51:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative.世界老年人跌倒预防与管理指南:全球倡议。
Age Ageing. 2022 Sep 2;51(9). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac205.
5
Therapy options for those affected by a long lie after a fall: a scoping review.摔伤后长期卧床患者的治疗选择:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03258-2.
6
Effects of supervised high-intensity hardstyle kettlebell training on grip strength and health-related physical fitness in insufficiently active older adults: the BELL pragmatic controlled trial.有监督的高强度硬式壶铃训练对活动不足的老年人握力及健康相关身体素质的影响:BELL实用对照试验
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02958-z.
7
Using Treatment Fidelity Measures to Understand Walking Recovery: A Secondary Analysis From the Community Ambulation Project.使用治疗保真度测量来理解行走康复:来自社区行走计划的二次分析。
Phys Ther. 2021 Aug 1;101(8). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab109.
8
Discriminative validity of the Core outcome set functional independence in a population of older adults.老年人群体中核心结局集功能独立性的判别有效性。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01705-6.
9
Validity and reliability of the Ocular Motor Nerve Palsy Scale.动眼神经麻痹量表的效度和信度。
Neural Regen Res. 2018 Oct;13(10):1851-1856. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.238716.