• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队发展过程中的领导者评估与团队凝聚力:与性别有关吗?

Leader evaluation and team cohesiveness in the process of team development: A matter of gender?

作者信息

Rovira-Asenjo Núria, Pietraszkiewicz Agnieszka, Sczesny Sabine, Gumí Tània, Guimerà Roger, Sales-Pardo Marta

机构信息

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.

Department of Psychology, Division of Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0186045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186045. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0186045
PMID:29059231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5653182/
Abstract

Leadership positions are still stereotyped as masculine, especially in male-dominated fields (e.g., engineering). So how do gender stereotypes affect the evaluation of leaders and team cohesiveness in the process of team development? In our study participants worked in 45 small teams (4-5 members). Each team was headed by either a female or male leader, so that 45 leaders (33% women) supervised 258 team members (39% women). Over a period of nine months, the teams developed specific engineering projects as part of their professional undergraduate training. We examined leaders' self-evaluation, their evaluation by team members, and team cohesiveness at two points of time (month three and month nine, the final month of the collaboration). While we did not find any gender differences in leaders' self-evaluation at the beginning, female leaders evaluated themselves more favorably than men at the end of the projects. Moreover, female leaders were evaluated more favorably than male leaders at the beginning of the project, but the evaluation by team members did not differ at the end of the projects. Finally, we found a tendency for female leaders to build more cohesive teams than male leaders.

摘要

领导职位仍然被刻板地认为是男性化的,尤其是在男性主导的领域(如工程领域)。那么,性别刻板印象在团队发展过程中是如何影响对领导者的评价和团队凝聚力的呢?在我们的研究中,参与者们在45个小团队(4 - 5名成员)中工作。每个团队由一名女性或男性领导带领,这样45名领导者(33%为女性)管理着258名团队成员(39%为女性)。在九个月的时间里,这些团队开展特定的工程项目,作为其本科专业培训的一部分。我们在两个时间点(第三个月和第九个月,即合作的最后一个月)考察了领导者的自我评价、团队成员对他们的评价以及团队凝聚力。虽然一开始我们没有发现领导者自我评价中的任何性别差异,但在项目结束时,女性领导者对自己的评价比男性更积极。此外,在项目开始时,团队成员对女性领导者的评价比对男性领导者更积极,但在项目结束时,团队成员的评价没有差异。最后,我们发现女性领导者比男性领导者有建立更具凝聚力团队的倾向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/0a079dbd0871/pone.0186045.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/8290764d4431/pone.0186045.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/006c4c398219/pone.0186045.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/a96ac4483451/pone.0186045.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/0a079dbd0871/pone.0186045.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/8290764d4431/pone.0186045.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/006c4c398219/pone.0186045.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/a96ac4483451/pone.0186045.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fbb/5653182/0a079dbd0871/pone.0186045.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Leader evaluation and team cohesiveness in the process of team development: A matter of gender?团队发展过程中的领导者评估与团队凝聚力:与性别有关吗?
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0186045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186045. eCollection 2017.
2
Learning to lead: self- and peer evaluation of team leaders in the human structure didactic block.学习领导:人体结构教学模块中团队领导者的自我评估与同伴评估
Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Oct;2(5):210-7. doi: 10.1002/ase.101.
3
Trauma team leaders' non-verbal communication: video registration during trauma team training.创伤团队领导者的非语言沟通:创伤团队培训期间的视频记录
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 25;24:37. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0230-7.
4
I am one of you! Team prototypicality as a facilitator for female leaders.我与你们是一类人!团队典型性对女性领导者的促进作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:859577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859577. eCollection 2022.
5
We will be champions: Leaders' confidence in 'us' inspires team members' team confidence and performance.我们将成为冠军:领导者对“我们”的信心激发团队成员的团队信心和表现。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Dec;26(12):1455-1469. doi: 10.1111/sms.12603. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
6
Servant versus directive leadership and promotability: does leader gender matter?仆人式领导与指令式领导及晋升潜力:领导者性别有影响吗?
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 11;14:957121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.957121. eCollection 2023.
7
Leader airtime management and team effectiveness in emergency management command and control (EMCC) teams.领导者的空中时间管理与应急管理指挥与控制(EMCC)团队的团队效能。
Ergonomics. 2023 Oct;66(10):1565-1581. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2157493. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
8
How Can Job Crafting Be Reproduced? Examining the Trickle-Down Effect of Job Crafting from Leaders to Employees.工作重塑如何再现?检验工作重塑从领导者到员工的涓滴效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;17(3):894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030894.
9
Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Representation in Leadership Positions at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers.国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心领导层中的种族、族裔和性别代表性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112807. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12807.
10
Leadership of resuscitation teams: "Lighthouse Leadership'.复苏团队的领导:“灯塔式领导”
Resuscitation. 1999 Sep;42(1):27-45. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00080-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Violence and Clinical Learning Environments in Medical Residencies.医学住院医师培训中的暴力与临床学习环境
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 13;20(18):6754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186754.
2
Gender equity in anesthesia: is it time to rock the boat?麻醉领域的性别平等:是时候打破现状了吗?
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-01987-4.
3
Gender Disparity in Leadership Positions of General Surgical Societies in North America, Europe, and Oceania.北美、欧洲和大洋洲普通外科学会领导职位中的性别差异。

本文引用的文献

1
Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators.性别与领导效能感知:情境调节变量的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1129-45. doi: 10.1037/a0036751. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
2
Predicting future conflict between team-members with parameter-free models of social networks.用无参数的社交网络模型预测团队成员之间未来的冲突。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1999. doi: 10.1038/srep01999.
3
Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms.领导者刻板印象是否具有男性气质?三个研究范式的元分析。
Cureus. 2019 Dec 3;11(12):e6285. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6285.
4
Cost-minimizing team hires with participation constraint.具有参与约束的最小化成本团队招聘。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0201596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201596. eCollection 2018.
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):616-42. doi: 10.1037/a0023557.
4
Think crisis-think female: the glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype.认为危机-认为女性:玻璃悬崖和思维经理-思维男性刻板印象的语境变化。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 May;96(3):470-84. doi: 10.1037/a0022133.
5
Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups.人类群体表现中存在集体智慧因素的证据。
Science. 2010 Oct 29;330(6004):686-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1193147. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
6
Massively collaborative mathematics.大规模协作数学。
Nature. 2009 Oct 15;461(7266):879-81. doi: 10.1038/461879a.
7
Perceiving an opponent's loss: gender-related differences in the medial-frontal negativity.感知对手的失败:中额前负波的性别相关差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Sep;1(2):149-57. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl020.
8
Motivated to penalize: women's strategic rejection of successful women.受惩罚动机:女性对成功女性的策略性排斥。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Feb;34(2):237-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167207310027.
9
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.团队在知识生产中日益占据主导地位。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
10
Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations.消除阻碍:身份安全缓和了刻板印象威胁对女性领导抱负的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Feb;88(2):276-87. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276.