• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用无参数的社交网络模型预测团队成员之间未来的冲突。

Predicting future conflict between team-members with parameter-free models of social networks.

机构信息

Departament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona 43007, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2013;3:1999. doi: 10.1038/srep01999.

DOI:10.1038/srep01999
PMID:23770685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3683702/
Abstract

Despite the well-documented benefits of working in teams, teamwork also results in communication, coordination and management costs, and may lead to personal conflict between team members. In a context where teams play an increasingly important role, it is of major importance to understand conflict and to develop diagnostic tools to avert it. Here, we investigate empirically whether it is possible to quantitatively predict future conflict in small teams using parameter-free models of social network structure. We analyze data of conflict appearance and resolution between 86 team members in 16 small teams, all working in a real project for nine consecutive months. We find that group-based models of complex networks successfully anticipate conflict in small teams whereas micro-based models of structural balance, which have been traditionally used to model conflict, do not.

摘要

尽管团队合作的好处有案可稽,但团队合作也会导致沟通、协调和管理成本,并且可能导致团队成员之间的个人冲突。在团队扮演着越来越重要的角色的背景下,了解冲突并开发诊断工具来避免冲突至关重要。在这里,我们使用无参数的社交网络结构模型来实证研究是否可以使用定量方法来预测小型团队中的未来冲突。我们分析了 16 个小团队中的 86 名团队成员在连续 9 个月的一个实际项目中的冲突出现和解决的数据。我们发现,基于群体的复杂网络模型可以成功地预测小型团队中的冲突,而传统上用于建模冲突的基于微观的结构平衡模型则不能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ce/3683702/4c7ae7f94b6e/srep01999-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ce/3683702/8b51a44f6c7f/srep01999-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ce/3683702/31a28ff7f992/srep01999-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ce/3683702/4c7ae7f94b6e/srep01999-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ce/3683702/8b51a44f6c7f/srep01999-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ce/3683702/31a28ff7f992/srep01999-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ce/3683702/4c7ae7f94b6e/srep01999-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting future conflict between team-members with parameter-free models of social networks.用无参数的社交网络模型预测团队成员之间未来的冲突。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1999. doi: 10.1038/srep01999.
2
What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams.表面之下正在发生什么?权力、冲突与医疗团队的表现。
Med Educ. 2012 Sep;46(9):838-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04322.x.
3
Personality, relationship conflict, and teamwork-related mental models.个性、关系冲突与团队合作相关的心智模式。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 5;9(11):e110223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110223. eCollection 2014.
4
Applying Conflict Management Strategies to the Pediatric Operating Room.运用冲突管理策略于小儿手术室。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Oct;129(4):1109-1117. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003991.
5
Review of transforming teamwork: Cultivating collaborative cultures.变革性团队合作综述:培育协作文化
Fam Syst Health. 2021 Jun;39(2):401-403. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000603.
6
Advice networks in teams: the role of transformational leadership and members' core self-evaluations.团队中的建议网络:变革型领导和成员核心自我评价的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Sep;96(5):1004-17. doi: 10.1037/a0023254.
7
Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: the critical role of team psychological safety climate.在团队中收获任务冲突的好处:团队心理安全氛围的关键作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jan;97(1):151-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024200. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
8
Skewed task conflicts in teams: What happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest?团队中的任务冲突偏向:当少数成员看到的冲突比其他人多时会发生什么?
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jul;101(7):1045-55. doi: 10.1037/apl0000059. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Organizing for Mars: A Task Management Perspective on Work within Spaceflight Multiteam Systems.组织火星任务:航天多团队系统中工作的任务管理视角。
Hum Factors. 2023 Sep;65(6):1199-1220. doi: 10.1177/00187208221129939. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
10
What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.差异为何有差异?组织中多元化团队的承诺与现实。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x. Epub 2005 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Leader evaluation and team cohesiveness in the process of team development: A matter of gender?团队发展过程中的领导者评估与团队凝聚力:与性别有关吗?
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0186045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186045. eCollection 2017.
2
Bone Fusion in Normal and Pathological Development is Constrained by the Network Architecture of the Human Skull.人类颅骨的网络结构限制了正常和病理发育中的骨融合。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 13;7(1):3376. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03196-9.
3
Predicting missing links in complex networks based on common neighbors and distance.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting human preferences using the block structure of complex social networks.利用复杂社交网络的模块结构预测人类偏好。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044620. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
2
Computing global structural balance in large-scale signed social networks.计算大规模有符号社交网络中的全局结构平衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 27;108(52):20953-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109521108. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
3
Local balancing influences global structure in social networks.局部平衡影响社会网络中的全局结构。
基于共同邻居和距离预测复杂网络中的缺失链接。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 1;6:38208. doi: 10.1038/srep38208.
4
An evolutionary game approach for determination of the structural conflicts in signed networks.一种用于确定带符号网络中结构冲突的演化博弈方法。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 26;6:22022. doi: 10.1038/srep22022.
5
Matching-centrality decomposition and the forecasting of new links in networks.匹配中心性分解与网络中新链接的预测。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 10;283(1824). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2702.
6
The reconstruction of complex networks with community structure.具有社区结构的复杂网络的重建。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 1;5:17287. doi: 10.1038/srep17287.
7
Efficiently inferring community structure in bipartite networks.高效推断二分网络中的社区结构。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Jul;90(1):012805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012805. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 1;108(5):1751-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018901108. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
4
Continuous-time model of structural balance.结构平衡的连续时间模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 1;108(5):1771-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013213108. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
5
Attitudes and cognitive organization.态度与认知组织。
J Psychol. 1946 Jan;21:107-12. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275.
6
Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups.人类群体表现中存在集体智慧因素的证据。
Science. 2010 Oct 29;330(6004):686-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1193147. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
7
Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks.缺失和虚假交互以及复杂网络的重构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 29;106(52):22073-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908366106. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
8
Network analysis in the social sciences.社会科学中的网络分析。
Science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):892-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821.
9
Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science.多所大学联合研究团队:科学领域中影响力、地域及分层的转变
Science. 2008 Nov 21;322(5905):1259-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1158357. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
10
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.团队在知识生产中日益占据主导地位。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099. Epub 2007 Apr 12.