Department of Paleobiology MRC-121, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, DC 20013-7012, USA
Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 5;372(1735). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0422.
Sewall Wright's fitness landscape introduced the concept of evolutionary spaces in 1932. George Gaylord Simpson modified this to an adaptive, phenotypic landscape in 1944 and since then evolutionary spaces have played an important role in evolutionary theory through fitness and adaptive landscapes, phenotypic and functional trait spaces, morphospaces and related concepts. Although the topology of such spaces is highly variable, from locally Euclidean to pre-topological, evolutionary change has often been interpreted as a search through a pre-existing space of possibilities, with novelty arising by accessing previously inaccessible or difficult to reach regions of a space. Here I discuss the nature of evolutionary novelty and innovation within the context of evolutionary spaces, and argue that the primacy of search as a conceptual metaphor ignores the generation of new spaces as well as other changes that have played important evolutionary roles.This article is part of the themed issue 'Process and pattern in innovations from cells to societies'.
1932 年,Sewall Wright 的适应度景观引入了进化空间的概念。1944 年,George Gaylord Simpson 将其修改为适应性表型景观,自此,进化空间通过适应度和适应性景观、表型和功能特征空间、形态空间和相关概念,在进化理论中扮演了重要角色。尽管这些空间的拓扑结构高度可变,从局部欧几里得到前拓扑,但进化变化通常被解释为在预先存在的可能性空间中进行搜索,通过访问以前无法访问或难以到达的空间区域来产生新颖性。在这里,我将在进化空间的背景下讨论进化新颖性和创新性的本质,并认为搜索作为一个概念隐喻的首要地位忽略了新空间的产生以及其他在进化中发挥重要作用的变化。本文是“从细胞到社会的创新的过程和模式”专题的一部分。