Suppr超能文献

认知功能测试工具的意大利语版本(CFI):在健康老年人群队列中的信度和效度。

The Italian version of cognitive function instrument (CFI): reliability and validity in a cohort of healthy elderly.

机构信息

Clinica Neurologica, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

I.R.C.C.S. Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2018 Jan;39(1):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3150-z. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

Abstract

The Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study (ADCS)-Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) is a 14-item questionnaire administered to the subject and the referent, aimed at detecting early changes in cognitive and functional abilities in individuals without clinical impairment. It is used for monitoring annual variations in cognitive functioning in prevention trials. The aim of the present study was to validate the Italian version of the CFI. A consecutive series of 257 functionally independent subjects was recruited among relatives of patients or as volunteers. They were administered CFI and global cognition measurements: Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The reliability and criterion validity were comparable to the original in both self- and partner-report. Similarly to what reported in the original version, we found a corrected item-total correlation ranging between 0.38 and 0.54 in self-report and between 0.33 and 0.64 in partner-report. Cronbach's α was 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.83) in self-report and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.84) in partner-report. Total partner- and self-report scores were significantly correlated (rS = 0.31, p < 0.001). CFI self-report and CFI total-score (partner + self-report) were negatively correlated with MMSE (rS = - 0.15, p = 0.022; rS = - 0.17, p = 0.008) and RBANS (rS = - 0.22, p < 0.001; rS = - 0.25, p < 0.001). Analogous trends were found in the partner score, with a correlation with RBANS (rS = - 0.17, p = 0.014) and MMSE (rS = - 0.11, p = 0.071). Our results support the reliability and validity of the Italian version of CFI. In order to definitely propose the use of CFI for tracking longitudinal changes of cognitive and functional abilities in subjects without clinical impairment, data from the follow-up of this cohort are needed.

摘要

阿尔茨海默病合作研究(ADCS)-认知功能量表(CFI)是一项针对受试者和参照者的 14 项问卷,旨在检测无临床损伤个体认知和功能能力的早期变化。它用于监测预防试验中认知功能的年度变化。本研究的目的是验证 CFI 的意大利语版本。连续系列的 257 名功能独立的受试者从患者的亲属或志愿者中招募。他们接受了 CFI 和整体认知测量:简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和重复认知状态评估电池(RBANS)。在自我报告和同伴报告中,其可靠性和标准效度与原始版本相当。与原始版本报告的结果相似,我们发现自我报告中的校正项目总分相关性在 0.38 到 0.54 之间,同伴报告中的校正项目总分相关性在 0.33 到 0.64 之间。自我报告中的克朗巴赫 α 为 0.77(95%置信区间 0.72-0.83),同伴报告中的克朗巴赫 α 为 0.78(95%置信区间 0.73-0.84)。同伴和自我报告的总分显著相关(rS=0.31,p<0.001)。CFI 自我报告和 CFI 总分(同伴+自我报告)与 MMSE(rS=-0.15,p=0.022;rS=-0.17,p=0.008)和 RBANS(rS=-0.22,p<0.001;rS=-0.25,p<0.001)呈负相关。在同伴得分中也发现了类似的趋势,与 RBANS(rS=-0.17,p=0.014)和 MMSE(rS=-0.11,p=0.071)呈负相关。我们的结果支持 CFI 的意大利语版本的可靠性和有效性。为了明确提议使用 CFI 来跟踪无临床损伤个体认知和功能能力的纵向变化,需要来自该队列随访的数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验