Suppr超能文献

认知功能量表(CFI)在检测非痴呆老年人认知衰退方面的效用。

The Utility of the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) to Detect Cognitive Decline in Non-Demented Older Adults.

作者信息

Li Clara, Neugroschl Judith, Luo Xiaodong, Zhu Carolyn, Aisen Paul, Ferris Steven, Sano Mary

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(2):427-437. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161294.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subjective cognitive complaint is a sensitive marker of decline.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to (1) examine reliability of subjective cognitive complaint using the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI), and (2) assess the utility of the CFI to detect cognitive decline in non-demented elders.

METHODS

Data from a four-year longitudinal study at multiple Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) sites were extracted (n = 644). Of these, 497 had Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global scores of 0 and 147 had a CDR of 0.5. Mean age and education were 79.5±3.6 and 15.0±3.1 years, respectively. All participants and their study partners completed the subject and study partner CFI yearly. Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (mMMSE) and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) were administered. Scores below the predetermined cut-off scores on either measure at annual visit were triggers for a full diagnostic evaluation. Cognitive decline was defined by the absence/presence of the trigger.

RESULTS

Three-month test retest reliability showed that inter-class coefficients for subject and study partner CFI were 0.76 and 0.78, respectively. Generalized estimating equation method revealed that both subject and study partner CFI change scores and scores from previous year were sensitive to cognitive decline in the CDR 0 group (p < 0.05). In the CDR 0.5 group, only the study partner CFI change score predicted cognitive decline (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cognitive decline was predicted differentially by CDR level with subject CFI scores providing the best prediction for those with CDR 0 while study partner CFI predicted best for those at CDR 0.5.

摘要

背景

主观认知主诉是衰退的敏感指标。

目的

本研究旨在(1)使用认知功能量表(CFI)检验主观认知主诉的可靠性,以及(2)评估CFI在检测非痴呆老年人认知衰退方面的效用。

方法

提取来自多个阿尔茨海默病协作研究(ADCS)站点的一项为期四年的纵向研究的数据(n = 644)。其中,497人的临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)总体评分为0,147人的CDR为0.5。平均年龄和受教育年限分别为79.5±3.6岁和15.0±3.1年。所有参与者及其研究伙伴每年完成受试者和研究伙伴CFI。进行改良简易精神状态检查(mMMSE)和自由及线索选择性回忆测验(FCSRT)。年度访视时,任何一项测量得分低于预定临界值即为进行全面诊断评估的触发因素。认知衰退由是否存在触发因素来定义。

结果

三个月的重测信度显示,受试者和研究伙伴CFI的组内相关系数分别为0.76和0.78。广义估计方程法显示,受试者和研究伙伴CFI变化得分以及上一年得分对CDR 0组的认知衰退均敏感(p < 0.05)。在CDR 0.5组中,只有研究伙伴CFI变化得分可预测认知衰退(p < 0.05)。

结论

CDR水平对认知衰退的预测存在差异,受试者CFI得分对CDR 0者的预测最佳,而研究伙伴CFI对CDR 0.5者的预测最佳。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
ADCS Prevention Instrument Project: quality of life assessment (QOL).ADCS预防工具项目:生活质量评估(QOL)。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006 Oct-Dec;20(4 Suppl 3):S179-90. doi: 10.1097/01.wad.0000213874.25053.e5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验