Amariglio Rebecca E, Donohue Michael C, Marshall Gad A, Rentz Dorene M, Salmon David P, Ferris Steven H, Karantzoulis Stella, Aisen Paul S, Sperling Reisa A
Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Harvar.
Division of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego5Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego.
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Apr;72(4):446-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3375.
Several large-scale Alzheimer disease (AD) secondary prevention trials have begun to target individuals at the preclinical stage. The success of these trials depends on validated outcome measures that are sensitive to early clinical progression in individuals who are initially asymptomatic.
To investigate the utility of the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) to track early changes in cognitive function in older individuals without clinical impairment at baseline.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal study from February 2002 through February 2007 at participating Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study sites. Individuals were followed up annually for 48 months after the baseline visit. The study included 468 healthy older individuals (Clinical Dementia Rating scale [CDR] global scores of 0, above cutoff on the modified Mini-Mental State Examination and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test) (mean [SD] age, 79.4 [3.6] years; age range, 75.0-93.8 years). All study participants and their study partners completed the self and partner CFIs annually. Individuals also underwent concurrent annual neuropsychological assessment and APOE genotyping.
The CFI scores between clinical progressors (CDR score, ≥0.5) and nonprogressors (CDR score, 0) and between APOE ε4 carriers and noncarriers were compared. Correlations of change between the CFI scores and neuropsychological performance were assessed longitudinally.
At 48 months, group differences between clinical progressors and non-progressors were significant for self (2.13, SE=0.45, P<.001), partner (5.08, SE=0.59, P<.001), and self plus partner (7.04, SE=0.83, P<.001) CFI total scores. At month 48, APOE ε4 carriers had greater progression than noncarriers on the partner (1.10, SE=0.44, P<.012) and self plus partner (1.56, SE=0.63, P<.014) CFI scores. Both self and partner CFI change were associated with longitudinal cognitive decline (self, ρ=0.32, 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.46; partner, ρ=0.56, 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.68), although findings suggest self-report may be more accurate early in the process, whereas accuracy of partner report improves when there is progression to cognitive impairment.
Demonstrating long-term clinical benefit will be critical for the success of recently launched secondary prevention trials. The CFI appears to be a brief, but informative potential outcome measure that provides insight into functional abilities at the earliest stages of disease.
多项大规模阿尔茨海默病(AD)二级预防试验已开始针对临床前阶段的个体。这些试验的成功取决于对最初无症状个体的早期临床进展敏感的经过验证的结局指标。
研究认知功能量表(CFI)在追踪基线时无临床损伤的老年人认知功能早期变化方面的效用。
设计、地点和参与者:2002年2月至2007年2月在参与的阿尔茨海默病协作研究地点进行的纵向研究。个体在基线访视后每年随访48个月。该研究纳入了468名健康老年人(临床痴呆评定量表[CDR]总体评分为0,改良简易精神状态检查和自由及线索选择性回忆测验得分高于临界值)(平均[标准差]年龄为79.4[3.6]岁;年龄范围为75.0 - 93.8岁)。所有研究参与者及其研究伙伴每年完成自我和伙伴CFI。个体还同时接受年度神经心理学评估和APOE基因分型。
比较临床进展者(CDR评分≥0.5)和非进展者(CDR评分0)之间以及APOE ε4携带者和非携带者之间的CFI评分。纵向评估CFI评分变化与神经心理学表现之间的相关性。
在48个月时,临床进展者和非进展者之间在自我(2.13,标准误 = 0.45,P <.001)、伙伴(5.08,标准误 = 0.59,P <.001)以及自我加伙伴(7.04,标准误 = 0.83,P <.001)CFI总分上的组间差异显著。在第48个月时,APOE ε4携带者在伙伴(1.10,标准误 = 0.44,P <.012)和自我加伙伴(1.56,标准误 = 0.63,P <.014)CFI评分上的进展大于非携带者。自我和伙伴CFI变化均与纵向认知衰退相关(自我,ρ = 0.32,95%置信区间为0.13至0.46;伙伴,ρ = 0.56,95%置信区间为0.42至0.68),尽管研究结果表明自我报告在过程早期可能更准确,而当进展到认知障碍时伙伴报告的准确性会提高。
证明长期临床益处对于最近启动的二级预防试验的成功至关重要。CFI似乎是一种简短但信息丰富的潜在结局指标,可在疾病最早阶段洞察功能能力。