Willoughby C P, Cowan R E, Gould S R, Machell R J, Stewart J B
Basildon Hospital, Essex, U.K.
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1988;148:40-4. doi: 10.3109/00365528809101546.
Fifty-six patients with ulcerative colitis of mild to moderate severity were entered into a randomized, double-dummy comparison of sulphasalazine, 3 g/day, with olsalazine, 3 g/day. Patients were assessed clinically, and by sigmoidoscopy and biopsy, on entry and at 5 weeks. Both agents produced a similar reduction in stool frequency and in the passage of blood and mucus. Improvements in sigmoidoscopic and histological appearances of the rectal mucosa were observed to a similar extent in both groups of patients. Two patients treated with olsalazine were withdrawn because of increased diarrhoea attributable to the medication. Two patients given sulphasalazine for the first time developed a skin rash. Other side-effects seen during the trial were mild. In this small short-term study, oral olsalazine appeared to be as effective as sulphasalazine in the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.
56例轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎患者参与了一项随机双盲对照试验,比较每日3克柳氮磺胺吡啶与每日3克奥沙拉嗪的疗效。在入组时及5周时,对患者进行临床评估以及乙状结肠镜检查和活检。两种药物在降低排便频率以及减少便血和黏液方面效果相似。两组患者直肠黏膜在乙状结肠镜检查和组织学表现上的改善程度相近。两名接受奥沙拉嗪治疗的患者因药物导致腹泻加重而退出试验。两名首次服用柳氮磺胺吡啶的患者出现皮疹。试验期间观察到的其他副作用较轻。在这项小型短期研究中,口服奥沙拉嗪在治疗轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎方面似乎与柳氮磺胺吡啶同样有效。