• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习行为与美国医师执照考试第一步成绩:学生自主平行课程的影响

Study Behaviors and USMLE Step 1 Performance: Implications of a Student Self-Directed Parallel Curriculum.

作者信息

Burk-Rafel Jesse, Santen Sally A, Purkiss Joel

机构信息

J. Burk-Rafel is an intern, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. He was previously a medical student, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3785-2154. S.A. Santen is assistant dean, Educational Research and Quality Improvement, and clinical professor of emergency medicine and learning health sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8002. J. Purkiss is assistant dean, Evaluation, Assessment, and Education Research, and assistant professor of internal medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. He was previously director, Evaluation and Assessment, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S67-S74. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001916.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001916
PMID:29065026
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine medical students' study behaviors when preparing for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1, and how these behaviors are associated with Step 1 scores when controlling for likely covariates.

METHOD

The authors distributed a study-behaviors survey in 2014 and 2015 at their institution to two cohorts of medical students who had recently taken Step 1. Demographic and academic data were linked to responses. Descriptive statistics, bivariate correlations, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 332 medical students, 274 (82.5%) participated. Most students (n = 211; 77.0%) began studying for Step 1 during their preclinical curriculum, increasing their intensity during a protected study period during which they averaged 11.0 hours studying per day (standard deviation [SD] 2.1) over a period of 35.3 days (SD 6.2). Students used numerous third-party resources, including reading an exam-specific 700-page review book on average 2.1 times (SD 0.8) and completing an average of 3,597 practice multiple-choice questions (SD 1,611). Initiating study prior to the designated study period, increased review book usage, and attempting more practice questions were all associated with higher Step 1 scores, even when controlling for Medical College Admission Test scores, preclinical exam performance, and self-identified score goal (adjusted R = 0.56, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students at one public institution engaged in a self-directed, "parallel" Step 1 curriculum using third-party study resources. Several study behaviors were associated with improved USMLE Step 1 performance, informing both institutional- and student-directed preparation for this high-stakes exam.

摘要

目的

确定医学生在准备美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步时的学习行为,以及在控制可能的协变量时这些行为与第一步考试成绩之间的关联。

方法

作者于2014年和2015年在其所在机构向两组最近参加过第一步考试的医学生发放了学习行为调查问卷。将人口统计学和学术数据与调查回复相关联。进行了描述性统计、双变量相关性分析和多元线性回归分析。

结果

在332名医学生中,274名(82.5%)参与了调查。大多数学生(n = 211;77.0%)在临床前课程期间开始准备第一步考试,并在一个受保护的学习期间增加学习强度,在此期间他们平均每天学习11.0小时(标准差[SD] 2.1),持续35.3天(SD 6.2)。学生们使用了大量第三方资源,包括平均阅读一本700页的针对该考试的复习资料2.1次(SD 0.8),并平均完成3597道多项选择题练习(SD 1611)。即使在控制医学院入学考试成绩、临床前考试表现和自我设定的分数目标后,在指定学习期之前开始学习、增加复习资料使用量以及尝试更多练习题都与第一步考试的更高分数相关(调整后的R = 0.56,P < .001)。

结论

一所公立机构的医学生使用第三方学习资源开展了自主的“平行”第一步课程。几种学习行为与USMLE第一步考试的更好表现相关,这为针对这场高风险考试的机构指导和学生自主准备提供了参考。

相似文献

1
Study Behaviors and USMLE Step 1 Performance: Implications of a Student Self-Directed Parallel Curriculum.学习行为与美国医师执照考试第一步成绩:学生自主平行课程的影响
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S67-S74. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001916.
2
Development and Evaluation of a Student-Initiated Test Preparation Program for the USMLE Step 1 Examination.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)学生自主备考计划的开发与评估
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):193-201. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1386106. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.探讨实习后 USMLE 步骤 1 成绩的预测因素。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):330-336. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1721293. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Relationship between students' perceptions of the adequacy of M1 and M2 curricula and their performance on USMLE step 1 examination.学生对 M1 和 M2 课程充足性的认知与他们在美国医师执照考试 (USMLE) 第 1 阶段考试中的表现之间的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 14;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1796-3.
5
Preparing to take the USMLE Step 1: a survey on medical students' self-reported study habits.准备参加美国执业医师资格考试第一步:一项关于医学生自我报告学习习惯的调查。
Postgrad Med J. 2015 May;91(1075):257-61. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133081. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
6
Two perspectives on the effects of a curriculum change: student experience and the United States medical licensing examination, step 1.关于课程变革影响的两种观点:学生体验与美国医师执照考试第一步
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S117-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318141f4f0.
7
Positive impact of a master of science in applied anatomy program on USMLE Step 1 performance.应用解剖学硕士课程对美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步成绩的积极影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):31-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.1455. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
8
Correlation of the National Emergency Medicine M4 Clerkship Examination with USMLE Examination Performance.国家急诊医学M4临床实习考试与美国医师执照考试成绩的相关性。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1159-65. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.25496. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Institutional differences in USMLE Step 1 and 2 CK performance: Cross-sectional study of 89 US allopathic medical schools.美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步和第 2 临床知识(CK)成绩的院校差异:对 89 所美国传统医学学校的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 4;14(11):e0224675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224675. eCollection 2019.
10
Multivariable analysis of factors associated with USMLE scores across U.S. medical schools.多变量分析与美国医学院 USMLE 分数相关的因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 20;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1605-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoupling the United States Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLEs) From the Medical Curriculum to Promote Student Well-Being and Professional Identity Development.将美国医师执照考试(USMLE)与医学课程脱钩,以促进学生的幸福感和职业身份认同发展。
Cureus. 2025 May 2;17(5):e83335. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83335. eCollection 2025 May.
2
An Investigation of Second-Year Medical Students' Use of Outside Resources at Two Institutions.两所院校二年级医学生对外部资源利用情况的调查
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Dec 6;35(2):847-862. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02243-1. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Learning together: a narrative review of external resources for medical education through a shared student-faculty lens.
共同学习:从学生与教师共同视角对医学教育外部资源的叙述性综述
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2483971. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2483971. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education Assessments: Navigating the Challenges to Academic Integrity.医学教育评估中的人工智能:应对学术诚信挑战
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 24;35(1):509-512. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02178-7. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
A Medical Student Online Community: A Qualitative Analysis of Step 1 Subreddit Posts.一个医学生在线社区:对美国医师执照考试第一步子版块帖子的定性分析
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 18;35(1):425-436. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02214-6. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Nonacademic predictors of China medical licensing examination.中国医师资格考试的非学术性预测因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06652-7.
7
The Double-Edged Sword of Third-Party Resources: Examining Use and Financial Burden of Extracurricular Tools in Medical Students.第三方资源的双刃剑:审视医学生课外工具的使用情况及经济负担
MedEdPublish (2016). 2025 Jan 2;14:4. doi: 10.12688/mep.20120.2. eCollection 2024.
8
Incorporating Faculty and Student Co-leadership in Workgroup Structures.在工作组结构中纳入教师和学生共同领导
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Aug 2;34(6):1521-1526. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02129-2. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Unlocking Medical Student Success: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Third-Party Resources Used for Medical Education and USMLE Board Preparation.开启医学生的成功之路:对用于医学教育和美国医师执照考试(USMLE)备考的第三方资源的系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Aug 7;34(6):1603-1622. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02116-7. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Socioeconomic factors and test preparation strategies are related to success on the USMLE Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) exam: a single-institution study.社会经济因素和备考策略与美国医师执照考试第二步临床知识(CK)考试的成绩相关:一项单机构研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):1412. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06414-x.