Low Julia Yq, Lacy Kathleen E, McBride Robert L, Keast Russell Sj
Centre for Advanced Sensory Science, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia; and.
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
J Nutr. 2017 Dec;147(12):2235-2242. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.254078. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Recent studies have proposed that humans may perceive complex carbohydrates and that sensitivity to simple carbohydrates is independent of sensitivity to complex carbohydrates. Variation in oral complex carbohydrate sensitivity may influence food consumption. This study aimed to investigate the associations between oral complex carbohydrate sensitivity, anthropometry, and dietary intake in adults. We assessed oral sensitivity to complex carbohydrates (maltodextrin and oligofructose) by measuring detection thresholds (DTs) and suprathreshold intensity perceptions (STs) for 34 participants, including 16 men (mean ± SEM age : 26.2 ± 0.4 y; range: 24-30 y) and 18 women (age: 29.4 ± 2.1 y; range: 24-55 y). We also measured height, weight, and waist circumference (WC) and participants completed a 4-d food diary and a food-frequency questionnaire. Measurements of oral sensitivity to complex carbohydrates were significantly correlated with WC and dietary energy and starch intakes (DT: = -0.38, < 0.05; ST: = 0.36-0.48, < 0.05). When participants were grouped into tertiles, there were significant differences in WC and total energy or starch intakes for those who were more sensitive or experienced high intensity compared with those who were less sensitive or experienced low intensity. Being more sensitive or experiencing high intensity was associated with greater energy (7968-8954 kJ/d) and starch (29.1-29.8% of energy) intakes and a greater WC (88.2-91.4 cm) than was being less sensitive or experiencing low intensity (6693-7747 kJ/d, 20.9-22.2% of energy, and 75.5-80.5 cm, respectively). Complex carbohydrate sensing is associated with WC and consumption of complex carbohydrates and energy in adults. This trial was registered at anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12616001356459.
最近的研究表明,人类可能会感知复合碳水化合物,并且对简单碳水化合物的敏感性独立于对复合碳水化合物的敏感性。口腔对复合碳水化合物敏感性的差异可能会影响食物摄入量。本研究旨在调查成年人口腔复合碳水化合物敏感性、人体测量学指标和饮食摄入量之间的关联。我们通过测量34名参与者对复合碳水化合物(麦芽糊精和低聚果糖)的检测阈值(DTs)和阈上强度感知(STs)来评估口腔对复合碳水化合物的敏感性,其中包括16名男性(平均±标准误年龄:26.2±0.4岁;范围:24 - 30岁)和18名女性(年龄:29.4±2.1岁;范围:24 - 55岁)。我们还测量了身高、体重和腰围(WC),参与者完成了一份为期4天的食物日记和一份食物频率问卷。口腔对复合碳水化合物敏感性的测量值与腰围、饮食能量和淀粉摄入量显著相关(DT:r = -0.38,P < 0.05;ST:r = 0.36 - 0.48,P < 0.05)。当将参与者分为三分位数时,与敏感性较低或强度较低的参与者相比,敏感性较高或强度较高的参与者在腰围、总能量或淀粉摄入量方面存在显著差异。与敏感性较低或强度较低(分别为6693 - 7747 kJ/d、能量的20.9 - 22.2%和75.5 - 80.5 cm)相比,敏感性较高或强度较高与更高的能量(7968 - 8954 kJ/d)和淀粉(能量的29.1 - 29.8%)摄入量以及更大的腰围(88.2 - 91.4 cm)相关。复合碳水化合物感知与成年人的腰围以及复合碳水化合物和能量的消耗有关。该试验在anzctr.org.au上注册为ACTRN12616001356459。