• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈背部扭伤相关疾病患者的信息需求:基于患者信念的德尔菲研究

Information needs of patients with whiplash associated disorders: A Delphi study of patient beliefs.

机构信息

Recover Injury Research Centre, NHMRC CRE in Road Traffic Injury, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

Recover Injury Research Centre, NHMRC CRE in Road Traffic Injury, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Feb;33:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.009
PMID:29073494
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whiplash associated disorders (WAD) result in significant personal and economic costs. Patient education and reassurance are recommended treatments for acute WAD but the information needs of patients have not been investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine what information whiplash-injured patients believe is important to help recovery in the acute stage of injury.

DESIGN

A Delphi design survey series with three rounds.

METHOD

Thirty-three participants who had sustained a whiplash injury within the last three years were invited to participate. Participants were asked to provide five statements, in response to an open-ended question, regarding what they believed was the most important information to provide to patients following a whiplash injury. Nineteen patients responded and 85 statements were collected and reviewed independently by two of the authors to remove duplicates. The importance of the remaining items was rated by the participants in the second survey round. Items rated by >50% of participants as important were included in the third survey round. To be deemed key information, >80% of participants had to rate an item as important in this final round.

RESULTS

Eighteen items met the criteria for key information. These points addressed four areas: assessment and treatment, recovery and symptoms, patient attitudes during treatment and relationships with health practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

The key information points endorsed by patients in this study may provide useful information to constitute a basis for reassurance and education provided to patients with WAD. The results also suggest that improved relationships between patients with whiplash and health practitioners is required.

摘要

背景

挥鞭伤相关疾病(WAD)会导致重大的个人和经济成本。患者教育和安慰被推荐用于急性 WAD 的治疗,但患者的信息需求尚未得到调查。

目的

确定挥鞭伤患者认为哪些信息对受伤急性期的康复很重要。

设计

一项具有三个轮次的 Delphi 设计调查系列。

方法

邀请了 33 名在过去三年内遭受过挥鞭伤的参与者参加。参与者被要求针对一个开放式问题提供五条陈述,内容是他们认为在挥鞭伤后向患者提供哪些信息最重要。19 名患者做出了回应,收集并由两位作者独立审查了 85 条陈述以去除重复项。在第二轮调查中,参与者对剩余项目的重要性进行了评分。在这最后一轮中,>50%的参与者将项目评为重要的,则被认为是关键信息。

结果

有 18 项符合关键信息的标准。这些要点涉及四个方面:评估和治疗、恢复和症状、患者在治疗过程中的态度以及与健康从业者的关系。

结论

本研究中患者认可的关键信息要点可以为向 WAD 患者提供安慰和教育提供有用的信息基础。研究结果还表明,需要改善挥鞭伤患者与健康从业者之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Information needs of patients with whiplash associated disorders: A Delphi study of patient beliefs.颈背部扭伤相关疾病患者的信息需求:基于患者信念的德尔菲研究
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Feb;33:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
2
What information do patients need following a whiplash injury? The perspectives of patients and physiotherapists.患者在挥鞭样损伤后需要哪些信息?患者和物理治疗师的观点。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 May;40(10):1135-1141. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1289253. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
3
Development of an active behavioural physiotherapy intervention (ABPI) for acute whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) II management: a modified Delphi study.开发用于急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)II型管理的主动行为物理治疗干预(ABPI):一项改良的德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 14;6(9):e011764. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011764.
4
StressModEx--Physiotherapist-led Stress Inoculation Training integrated with exercise for acute whiplash injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.应激模式训练——由物理治疗师主导的应激接种训练与运动相结合用于急性挥鞭伤:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):157. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
5
General practitioners knowledge and management of whiplash associated disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder: implications for patient care.全科医生对挥鞭样损伤相关疾病和创伤后应激障碍的认知与管理:对患者护理的启示
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 20;17:82. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0491-2.
6
Implementation of a guideline-based clinical pathway of care to improve health outcomes following whiplash injury (Whiplash ImPaCT): protocol of a randomised, controlled trial.基于指南的临床路径护理实施以改善挥鞭样损伤(Whiplash ImPaCT)后的健康结局:一项随机对照试验方案。
J Physiother. 2016 Apr;62(2):111. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
7
Physical and psychological aspects of whiplash: important considerations for primary care assessment, part 2--case studies.挥鞭样损伤的身体和心理方面:初级保健评估的重要考量因素,第2部分——案例研究
Man Ther. 2009 Feb;14(1):e8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 May 27.
8
Physiotherapy management of whiplash-associated disorders (WAD).挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)的物理治疗管理
J Physiother. 2014 Mar;60(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
Education by general practitioners or education and exercises by physiotherapists for patients with whiplash-associated disorders? A randomized clinical trial.全科医生对挥鞭样相关疾病患者进行的教育,还是物理治疗师进行的教育及锻炼?一项随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):723-31. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206381.15224.0f.
10
Prognosis of patients with whiplash-associated disorders consulting physiotherapy: development of a predictive model for recovery.接受物理治疗的颈挥鞭伤相关疾病患者的预后:恢复预测模型的制定。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 29;13:264. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-264.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing patient satisfaction with practitioner communication: patient-centered care, hospital environment and patient trust in the public hospitals.评估患者对医护人员沟通的满意度:公立医院中的以患者为中心的护理、医院环境及患者信任。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 21;12:1544498. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1544498. eCollection 2025.
2
Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 4: Neck Pain.慢性疼痛的最佳证据康复治疗 第4部分:颈部疼痛
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 15;8(8):1219. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081219.