Arnold Michael B, Khanna Dinesh, Denton Christopher P, van Laar Jacob M, Frech Tracy M, Anderson Marina E, Baron Murray, Chung Lorinda, Fierlbeck Gerhard, Lakshminarayanan Santhanam, Allanore Yannick, Riemekasten Gabriela, Steen Virginia, Müller-Ladner Ulf, Spotswood Helen, Burke Laura, Siegel Jeffrey, Jahreis Angelika, Furst Daniel E, Pope Janet E
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Rheumatology, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Jan 1;57(1):152-157. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex396.
Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) as an absolute state of well-being has shown promise as an outcome measure in many rheumatologic conditions. We aimed to assess whether PASS may be effective in active diffuse cutaneous SSc differentiating active from placebo.
Data from the phase 2 Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Adults with Systemic Sclerosis (faSScinate) trial were used, which compared tocilizumab (TCZ) vs placebo over 48 weeks followed by an open-label TCZ period to 96 weeks. Three different types of PASS questions were evaluated at weeks 8, 24, 48 and 96, including if a current state would be acceptable over time as a yes vs no response and Likert scales about how acceptable a current state is if remaining over time. Additional outcomes assessed included modified Rodnan skin score, HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI), physician and patient global assessments on a visual analogue scale, CRP and ESR.
The placebo group consisted of 44 patients and the TCZ group had 43 patients. At baseline, 33% achieved a PASS for all three PASS questions, with the proportion increasing to 69, 71 and 78%, respectively, at 96 weeks. Changes in PASS scores showed a moderately negative correlation with HAQ-DI and patient and physician global assessments visual analogue scales, which indicates expected improvements as PASS improved. The PASS question, 'Considering all of the ways your scleroderma has affected you, how acceptable would you rate your level of symptoms?' showed significant correlations with patient-reported outcomes and differentiating placebo vs TCZ at 48 weeks (P = 0.023).
PASS may be used as a patient-centred outcome in SSc, especially as a 7-point Likert scale. Further validation is required to determine the utility as an outcome measure in trials and clinical practice.
患者可接受症状状态(PASS)作为一种绝对的健康状态,在许多风湿性疾病中作为一种结局指标已显示出前景。我们旨在评估PASS在活动性弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症中区分活性药物与安慰剂方面是否有效。
使用来自皮下注射托珠单抗治疗成人系统性硬化症的2期安全性和有效性(faSScinate)试验的数据,该试验在48周内比较了托珠单抗(TCZ)与安慰剂,随后是至96周的开放标签TCZ期。在第8、24、48和96周评估了三种不同类型的PASS问题,包括当前状态随时间推移是否可接受(是与否的回答)以及关于如果当前状态持续一段时间有多可接受的李克特量表。评估的其他结局包括改良Rodnan皮肤评分、健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)、医生和患者在视觉模拟量表上的整体评估、CRP和ESR。
安慰剂组有44例患者,TCZ组有43例患者。在基线时,33%的患者在所有三个PASS问题上都达到了PASS,在96周时这一比例分别增至69%、71%和78%。PASS评分的变化与HAQ-DI以及患者和医生整体评估视觉模拟量表呈中度负相关,这表明随着PASS的改善有预期的改善。PASS问题“考虑到硬皮病影响你的所有方式,你会如何评价你的症状水平的可接受程度?”在第48周时与患者报告的结局以及区分安慰剂与TCZ有显著相关性(P = 0.023)。
PASS可作为系统性硬化症中以患者为中心的结局,尤其是作为7点李克特量表。需要进一步验证以确定其在试验和临床实践中作为结局指标的效用。