Suppr超能文献

确定类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者报告结局中可接受健康状况和重要改善的切点。

Identification of cutpoints for acceptable health status and important improvement in patient-reported outcomes, in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Institute of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2010 Jan;37(1):26-31. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090449. Epub 2009 Dec 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify cutpoints reflecting Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in patient-reported multi-attribute health status classification systems and health status measurements among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

We identified patients with RA, AS, and PsA from the Norwegian disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) register (NOR-DMARD). The patients (n = 4225) had started with DMARD and responded to the PASS and MCII anchoring questions at the 3-month followup examination. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves with 80% specificity and the 75th percentile approach were used to identify PASS and MCII cutpoints in the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and the Short-Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D) indexes, but also in other patient-reported outcomes (joint pain and patient global visual analog scale and Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire).

RESULTS

The PASS cutpoints estimated with 80% specificity were around 0.70 in EQ-5D in all diseases and around 0.65 in SF-6D. The cutpoints were around 0.65 and 0.60, respectively, when the 75th percentile approach was used. The MCII cutpoints assessed by 80% specificity varied from 0.10 to 0.19 in EQ-5D and from 0.07 to 0.10 in SF-6D.

CONCLUSION

The cutpoints for PASS in EQ-5D and SF-6D indicate that PASS corresponds to a health-related quality of life that is far from perfect health. Somewhat different cutpoints were identified for both PASS and MCII with 80% specificity versus the 75th percentile method.

摘要

目的

确定反映患者可接受症状状态(PASS)和最小临床重要改善(MCII)的切点,用于评估类风湿关节炎(RA)、强直性脊柱炎(AS)和银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者的多属性健康状况分类系统和健康状况测量。

方法

我们从挪威疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)登记处(NOR-DMARD)中确定了 RA、AS 和 PsA 患者。这些患者(n=4225)在开始使用 DMARD 后,在 3 个月随访检查时回答了 PASS 和 MCII 锚定问题。使用 80%特异性和第 75 百分位方法的接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线确定了 EuroQol-5 维度(EQ-5D)和简化 36 项健康调查(SF-6D)指数中的 PASS 和 MCII 切点,也确定了其他患者报告的结局(关节疼痛和患者总体视觉模拟量表和改良健康评估问卷)。

结果

使用 80%特异性估计的 PASS 切点在所有疾病中大约为 0.70,在 SF-6D 中大约为 0.65。当使用第 75 百分位方法时,切点分别约为 0.65 和 0.60。通过 80%特异性评估的 MCII 切点在 EQ-5D 中从 0.10 到 0.19 不等,在 SF-6D 中从 0.07 到 0.10 不等。

结论

EQ-5D 和 SF-6D 中的 PASS 切点表明 PASS 对应于远非完美健康的健康相关生活质量。使用 80%特异性与第 75 百分位方法相比,确定了 PASS 和 MCII 的切点略有不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验