Baldwin Claire, van Kessel Gisela, Phillips Anna, Johnston Kylie
Sansom Institute of Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Centenary Building, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Sansom Institute of Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia.
Phys Ther. 2017 Nov 1;97(11):1044-1065. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx076.
Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors have significant and independent effects on health. The use of wearable monitors to measure these constructs in people who are hospitalized with an acute illness is rapidly expanding, but has not been systematically described.
The purpose of this study was to review the use of accelerometer monitoring with inpatients who are acutely ill, including what activity and sedentary behaviors have been measured and how active or sedentary inpatients are.
Databases used were MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus.
Quantitative studies of adults with an acute medical or surgical hospital admission, on whom an accelerometer was used to measure a physical activity or sedentary behavior, were selected.
Procedures were completed independently by 2 reviewers, with differences resolved and cross-checked by a third reviewer. Forty-two studies were identified that recruited people who had medical diagnoses (n = 10), stroke (n = 5), critical illness (n = 3), acute exacerbations of lung disease (n = 7), cardiac conditions (n = 7), or who were postsurgery (n = 10). Physical activities or sedentary behaviors were reported in terms of time spent in a particular posture (lying/sitting, standing/stepping), active/inactive, or at a particular activity intensity. Physical activity was also reported as step count, number of episodes or postural transitions, and bouts. Inpatients spent 93% to 98.8% (range) of their hospital stay sedentary, and in most studies completed <1,000 steps/day despite up to 50 postural transitions/day. No study reported sedentary bouts. Many studies controlled for preadmission function as part of the recruitment strategy or analysis or both.
Heterogeneity in monitoring devices (17 models), protocols, and variable definitions limited comparability between studies and clinical groups to descriptive synthesis without meta-analysis.
Hospitalized patients were highly inactive, especially those with medical admissions, based on time and step parameters. Accelerometer monitoring of sedentary behavior patterns was less reported and warrants further research.
身体活动不足和久坐行为对健康有重大且独立的影响。使用可穿戴监测设备来测量急性病住院患者的这些指标正在迅速增加,但尚未得到系统描述。
本研究的目的是回顾加速度计监测在急性病住院患者中的应用,包括测量了哪些活动和久坐行为,以及住院患者的活动或久坐程度如何。
使用的数据库有MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和Scopus。
选取了对因急性内科或外科疾病入院的成年人进行的定量研究,这些研究使用加速度计测量身体活动或久坐行为。
由2名审阅者独立完成程序,差异由第3名审阅者解决并交叉核对。共确定了42项研究,这些研究招募的患者患有医学诊断疾病(n = 10)、中风(n = 5)、危重病(n = 3)、肺部疾病急性加重(n = 7)、心脏疾病(n = 7)或术后患者(n = 10)。身体活动或久坐行为通过在特定姿势(躺/坐、站/走)、活动/不活动或特定活动强度下花费的时间来报告。身体活动也以步数、发作次数或姿势转换次数以及活动回合数来报告。住院患者在住院期间93%至98.8%(范围)的时间处于久坐状态,并且在大多数研究中,尽管每天有多达50次姿势转换,但每天完成的步数仍<1000步。没有研究报告久坐回合数。许多研究将入院前功能作为招募策略或分析的一部分或两者都作为一部分进行了控制。
监测设备(17种型号)、方案和变量定义的异质性限制了研究和临床组之间的可比性,无法进行荟萃分析,只能进行描述性综合。
根据时间和步数参数,住院患者活动量极低,尤其是内科住院患者。关于久坐行为模式的加速度计监测报告较少,值得进一步研究。