• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一个用于将维度系数的因子保留标准应用于患者安全文化调查的Microsoft Excel工具。

Development of a Microsoft Excel tool for applying a factor retention criterion of a dimension coefficient to a survey on patient safety culture.

作者信息

Chien Tsair-Wei, Shao Yang, Jen Dong-Hui

机构信息

Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 27;15(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0784-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0784-8
PMID:29078778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5658999/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many quality-of-life studies have been conducted in healthcare settings, but few have used Microsoft Excel to incorporate Cronbach's α with dimension coefficient (DC) for describing a scale's characteristics. To present a computer module that can report a scale's validity, we manipulated datasets to verify a DC that can be used as a factor retention criterion for demonstrating its usefulness in a patient safety culture survey (PSC).

METHODS

Microsoft Excel Visual Basic for Applications was used to design a computer module for simulating 2000 datasets fitting the Rasch rating scale model. The datasets consisted of (i) five dual correlation coefficients (correl. = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.0) on two latent traits (i.e., true scores) following a normal distribution and responses to their respective 1/3 and 2/3 items in length; (ii) 20 scenarios of item lengths from 5 to 100; and (iii) 20 sample sizes from 50 to 1000. Each item containing 5-point polytomous responses was uniformly distributed in difficulty across a ± 2 logit range. Three methods (i.e., dimension interrelation ≥0.7, Horn's parallel analysis (PA) 95% confidence interval, and individual random eigenvalues) were used for determining one factor to retain. DC refers to the binary classification (1 as one factor and 0 as many factors) used for examining accuracy with the indicators sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The scale's reliability and DC were simultaneously calculated for each simulative dataset. PSC real data were demonstrated with DC to interpret reports of the unit-based construct validity using the author-made MS Excel module.

RESULTS

The DC method presented accurate sensitivity (=0.96), specificity (=0.92) with a DC criterion (≥0.70), and AUC (=0.98) that were higher than those of the two PA methods. PA combined with DC yielded good sensitivity (=0.96), specificity (=1.0) with a DC criterion (≥0.70), and AUC (=0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in computer technology may enable healthcare users familiar with MS Excel to apply DC as a factor retention criterion for determining a scale's unidimensionality and evaluating a scale's quality.

摘要

背景

许多生活质量研究已在医疗环境中开展,但很少有研究使用Microsoft Excel将克朗巴哈α系数与维度系数(DC)相结合来描述量表的特征。为了展示一个能够报告量表效度的计算机模块,我们对数据集进行了处理,以验证一个可作为因子保留标准的DC,以证明其在患者安全文化调查(PSC)中的有用性。

方法

使用Microsoft Excel的应用程序可视化Basic来设计一个计算机模块,用于模拟2000个符合拉施评分量表模型的数据集。这些数据集包括:(i)两个呈正态分布的潜在特质(即真实分数)上的五个双相关系数(相关系数分别为0.3、0.5、0.7、0.9和1.0)以及对其各自1/3和2/3长度项目的回答;(ii)20种从5到100的项目长度情景;以及(iii)20种从50到1000的样本量。每个包含5点多分类回答的项目在难度上在±2个对数单位范围内均匀分布。使用三种方法(即维度相互关系≥0.7、霍恩平行分析(PA)95%置信区间和个体随机特征值)来确定保留一个因子。DC指用于通过灵敏度、特异性和接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)指标检验准确性的二元分类(1表示一个因子,0表示多个因子)。为每个模拟数据集同时计算量表的信度和DC。使用作者制作的MS Excel模块,用DC展示PSC实际数据,以解释基于单位的结构效度报告。

结果

DC方法呈现出准确的灵敏度(=0.96)、特异性(=0.92),DC标准(≥0.70)以及AUC(=0.98),均高于两种PA方法。PA与DC相结合产生了良好的灵敏度(=0.96)、特异性(=1.0),DC标准(≥0.70)以及AUC(=0.99)。

结论

计算机技术的进步可能使熟悉MS Excel的医疗用户能够将DC用作因子保留标准,以确定量表的单维度性并评估量表质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/de1d3bbd9b31/12955_2017_784_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/a1b621449f20/12955_2017_784_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/abe58571c940/12955_2017_784_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/ba94715ff127/12955_2017_784_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/5c03ab3bf8f0/12955_2017_784_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/de1d3bbd9b31/12955_2017_784_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/a1b621449f20/12955_2017_784_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/abe58571c940/12955_2017_784_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/ba94715ff127/12955_2017_784_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/5c03ab3bf8f0/12955_2017_784_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c12/5658999/de1d3bbd9b31/12955_2017_784_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Microsoft Excel tool for applying a factor retention criterion of a dimension coefficient to a survey on patient safety culture.开发一个用于将维度系数的因子保留标准应用于患者安全文化调查的Microsoft Excel工具。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 27;15(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0784-8.
2
Comparison of Ferguson's δ and the Gini coefficient used for measuring the inequality of data related to health quality of life outcomes.比较弗格森的δ与基尼系数,用于衡量与健康生活质量结果相关的数据的不平等性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Apr 28;18(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01356-6.
3
Development of a Microsoft Excel tool for one-parameter Rasch model of continuous items: an application to a safety attitude survey.用于连续项目单参数Rasch模型的Microsoft Excel工具的开发:在安全态度调查中的应用
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 10;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0276-2.
4
A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture.疗养院患者安全文化中文版的心理测量学评估
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4664-4674. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13815. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Developing the Scale of Parental Participation in Care: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Examining the Scale's Psychometric Properties.父母参与护理量表的编制:新生儿重症监护病房,并检验量表的心理测量学特性。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021 Aug;65:103037. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103037. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
8
Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Cancer Empowerment Scale.癌症赋能量表土耳其版的效度和信度研究。
Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Dec;33(Suppl 13):314-320.
9
PAS-7 is Superior to APAIS for Assessing Preoperative Anxiety in the Chinese Population.PAS-7 在评估中国人群术前焦虑方面优于 APAIS。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2024 Oct;39(5):853-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2023.12.022. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
10
Psychometric properties and criterion related validity of the Norwegian version of hospital survey on patient safety culture 2.0.医院患者安全文化调查 2.0 挪威语版的心理测量学特性和效标关联效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 18;24(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11097-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Duplication in Taiwan Hospitals for Patients With High Blood Pressure, Sugar, and Lipids: Evaluation With a Mobile Health Mapping Tool.台湾医院高血压、糖尿病和高血脂患者的治疗重复情况:使用移动健康地图工具进行评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 27;8(7):e11627. doi: 10.2196/11627.
2
Comparison of Ferguson's δ and the Gini coefficient used for measuring the inequality of data related to health quality of life outcomes.比较弗格森的δ与基尼系数,用于衡量与健康生活质量结果相关的数据的不平等性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Apr 28;18(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01356-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety Culture in the Operating Room: Variability Among Perioperative Healthcare Workers.手术室安全文化:围术期医护人员的差异性。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Sep 1;17(6):412-416. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000385.
2
Psychometric Properties of an Arabic Safety Attitude Questionnaire (Short Form 2006).阿拉伯语安全态度问卷(2006年简版)的心理测量特性
Oman Med J. 2017 Mar;32(2):115-123. doi: 10.5001/omj.2017.21.
3
Development of a Microsoft Excel tool for one-parameter Rasch model of continuous items: an application to a safety attitude survey.
用于连续项目单参数Rasch模型的Microsoft Excel工具的开发:在安全态度调查中的应用
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 10;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0276-2.
4
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
5
The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?双项量表的信度:皮尔逊、克伦巴赫还是斯皮尔曼-布朗?
Int J Public Health. 2013 Aug;58(4):637-42. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
6
Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure.利用具有已知因子结构的比较数据确定探索性因子分析中保留的因子数量。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):282-92. doi: 10.1037/a0025697. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
7
Hospital safety culture in Taiwan: a nationwide survey using Chinese version Safety Attitude Questionnaire.台湾地区医院安全文化:使用中文版安全态度问卷的全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 10;10:234. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-234.
8
On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha.论克朗巴哈α系数的使用、误用及非常有限的实用性。
Psychometrika. 2009 Mar;74(1):107-120. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
9
Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys.衡量患者安全氛围:调查综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):364-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014217.
10
Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data.效度:关于评估数据的有意义解释。
Med Educ. 2003 Sep;37(9):830-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.