• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾医院高血压、糖尿病和高血脂患者的治疗重复情况:使用移动健康地图工具进行评估

Therapeutic Duplication in Taiwan Hospitals for Patients With High Blood Pressure, Sugar, and Lipids: Evaluation With a Mobile Health Mapping Tool.

作者信息

Kan Wei-Chih, Kuo Shu-Chun, Chien Tsair-Wei, Lin Jui-Chung John, Yeh Yu-Tsen, Chou Willy, Chou Po-Hsin

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Biological Science and Technology, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 27;8(7):e11627. doi: 10.2196/11627.

DOI:10.2196/11627
PMID:32716306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7418019/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease causes approximately half of all deaths in patients with type 2 diabetes. Duplicative prescriptions of medication in patients with high blood pressure (hypertension), high blood sugar (hyperglycemia), and high blood lipids (hyperlipidemia) have attracted substantial attention regarding the abuse of health care resources and to implement preventive measures for such abuse. Duplicative prescriptions may occur by patients receiving redundant medications for the same condition from two or more sources such as doctors, hospitals, and multiple providers, or as a result of the patient's wandering among hospitals.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the degree of duplicative prescriptions in Taiwanese hospitals for outpatients with three types of medications (antihypertension, antihyperglycemia, and antihyperlipidemia), and then used an online dashboard based on mobile health (mHealth) on a map to determine whether the situation has improved in the recent 25 fiscal quarters.

METHODS

Data on duplicate prescription rates of drugs for the three conditions were downloaded from the website of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration (TNHIA) from the third quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2016. Complete data on antihypertension, antihyperglycemia, and antihyperlipidemia prescriptions were obtained from 408, 414, and 359 hospitals, respectively. We used scale quality indicators to assess the attributes of the study data, created a dashboard that can be traced using mHealth, and selected the hospital type with the best performance regarding improvement on duplicate prescriptions for the three types of drugs using the weighted scores on an online dashboard. Kendall coefficient of concordance (W) was used to evaluate whether the performance rankings were unanimous.

RESULTS

The data quality was found to be acceptable and showed good reliability and construct validity. The online dashboard using mHealth on Google Maps allowed for easy and clear interpretation of duplicative prescriptions regarding hospital performance using multidisciplinary functionalities, and showed significant improvement in the reduction of duplicative prescriptions among all types of hospitals. Medical centers and regional hospitals showed better performance with improvement in the three types of duplicative prescriptions compared with the district hospitals. Kendall W was 0.78, indicating that the performance rankings were not unanimous (Chi square=4.67, P=.10).

CONCLUSIONS

This demonstration of a dashboard using mHealth on a map can inspire using the 42 other quality indicators of the TNHIA by hospitals in the future.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病导致约一半的2型糖尿病患者死亡。高血压、高血糖和高血脂患者的重复用药问题,引发了人们对医疗资源滥用的关注,并促使采取预防此类滥用的措施。重复用药可能是由于患者从医生、医院和多个医疗机构等两个或更多来源接受针对同一病症的多余药物,或者是患者在不同医院间辗转导致的。

目的

我们评估了台湾地区医院门诊患者三种药物(抗高血压药、抗高血糖药和抗高血脂药)的重复用药程度,然后使用基于移动健康(mHealth)的在线仪表盘在地图上确定在最近25个财政季度中这种情况是否有所改善。

方法

从2010年第三季度到2016年第三季度,从台湾地区国民健康保险管理局(TNHIA)网站下载三种病症药物的重复处方率数据。分别从408家、414家和359家医院获取了完整的抗高血压、抗高血糖和抗高血脂处方数据。我们使用量表质量指标评估研究数据的属性,创建了一个可通过mHealth追踪的仪表盘,并使用在线仪表盘上的加权分数选择在三种药物重复处方改善方面表现最佳的医院类型。使用肯德尔和谐系数(W)评估绩效排名是否一致。

结果

数据质量被认为是可接受的,具有良好的可靠性和结构效度。在谷歌地图上使用mHealth的在线仪表盘,通过多学科功能能够轻松、清晰地解读医院绩效方面的重复处方情况,并且显示出各类医院在减少重复处方方面有显著改善。医学中心和区域医院在三种重复处方的改善方面表现优于地区医院。肯德尔W值为0.78,表明绩效排名不一致(卡方=4.67,P=0.10)。

结论

这种在地图上使用mHealth的仪表盘展示,未来可能会启发医院使用TNHIA的其他42个质量指标。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic Duplication in Taiwan Hospitals for Patients With High Blood Pressure, Sugar, and Lipids: Evaluation With a Mobile Health Mapping Tool.台湾医院高血压、糖尿病和高血脂患者的治疗重复情况:使用移动健康地图工具进行评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 27;8(7):e11627. doi: 10.2196/11627.
2
Social network analysis of duplicative prescriptions: One-month analysis of medical facilities in Japan.重复处方的社会网络分析:日本医疗机构的一个月分析
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Online detection of potential duplicate medications and changes of physician behavior for outpatients visiting multiple hospitals using national health insurance smart cards in Taiwan.利用台湾全民健康保险卡,在线检测门诊病人潜在的重复用药情况和医生行为变化。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Mar;80(3):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.003. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
4
The Impact of a National Health Information Exchange Program Under a Single-payer System.单一支付方体系下国家卫生信息交换计划的影响。
Med Care. 2020 Jan;58(1):90-97. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001227.
5
Improved appropriateness of anti-tuberculosis prescription by the expert prescription review program in Taiwan.通过台湾的专家处方审查计划提高抗结核处方的适宜性。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Nov;119(11):1658-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
7
A Clinical Decision Support Engine Based on a National Medication Repository for the Detection of Potential Duplicate Medications: Design and Evaluation.基于国家药物库的临床决策支持引擎用于检测潜在重复用药:设计与评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Jan 19;6(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/medinform.9064.
8
Hospital-Owned Apps in Taiwan: Nationwide Survey.台湾地区医院自有应用程序:全国性调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 16;6(1):e22. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8636.
9
Optimizing the Feasibility and Scalability of a Geriatric Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative.优化老年外科质量改进计划的可行性和可扩展性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1074-1078. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15815. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
10
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].葡萄牙国民医疗服务体系中的效率与质量:评估方法
Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Unexpected aberrant data patterns on slope graphs to examine article characteristics: Say good-bye to the burst bar chart in bibliometrics.用于检查文章特征的斜率图上出现意外的异常数据模式:告别文献计量学中的爆发式柱状图。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e42657. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042657.
2
Healthcare dashboard technologies and data visualization for lipid management: A scoping review.用于脂质管理的医疗保健仪表板技术和数据可视化:范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02730-w.
3
Visualizing burst spots on research for four authors in MDPI journals named to be Citation Laureates 2021 using temporal bar graph.

本文引用的文献

1
Using report cards and dashboards to drive quality improvement: lessons learnt and lessons still to learn.利用报告卡和仪表板推动质量改进:已吸取的教训和仍需吸取的教训。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jun;27(6):417-420. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007563. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
2
Development of a Microsoft Excel tool for applying a factor retention criterion of a dimension coefficient to a survey on patient safety culture.开发一个用于将维度系数的因子保留标准应用于患者安全文化调查的Microsoft Excel工具。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 27;15(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0784-8.
3
Distribution of the Population at Risk of Cholangiocarcinoma in Bua Yai District, Nakhon Ratchasima of Thailand Using Google Map.
使用时间条形图可视化在 MDPI 期刊上发表研究的四位作者的突发点,这些期刊被命名为 2021 年引文桂冠奖。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34578. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034578.
4
The ascendancy of research in acronyms related to COVID-19 displayed on a growth-share matrix (GSM): Bibliometric analysis.COVID-19 相关缩略语研究的崛起在增长份额矩阵(GSM)上的表现:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Apr 25;102(17):e33626. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033626.
5
Reducing Therapeutic Duplication in Inpatient Medication Orders.减少住院患者医嘱中的治疗重复。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):538-543. doi: 10.1055/a-2082-4631. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
6
Sedatives and analgesics are major contributors to potentially inappropriate duplicate prescriptions in geriatric psychiatry.镇静剂和镇痛药是老年精神病学中潜在不合理重复处方的主要原因。
Psychogeriatrics. 2023 Mar;23(2):354-363. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12940. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
A leading bibliometric author does not have a dominant contribution to research based on the CJAL score: Bibliometric analysis.一位领先的文献计量学作者在基于 CJAL 分数的研究中没有占主导地位的贡献:文献计量学分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 13;102(2):e32609. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032609.
8
Using the absolute advantage coefficient (AAC) to measure the strength of damage hit by COVID-19 in India on a growth-share matrix.利用绝对优势系数(AAC)在增长-份额矩阵上衡量新冠疫情对印度造成的损害程度。
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Jun 24;26(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00528-4.
利用谷歌地图分析泰国呵叻府布艾县胆管癌高危人群分布情况。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):1433-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.3.1433.
4
Social network analysis of duplicative prescriptions: One-month analysis of medical facilities in Japan.重复处方的社会网络分析:日本医疗机构的一个月分析
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
5
Are healthcare quality "report cards" reaching consumers? Awareness in the chronically ill population.医疗质量“成绩单”能传达给消费者吗?慢性病患者群体中的知晓情况。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Mar;21(3):236-44.
6
Use of a Google Map Tool Embedded in an Internet Survey Instrument: Is it a Valid and Reliable Alternative to Geocoded Address Data?在网络调查问卷工具中嵌入谷歌地图工具的应用:它是否是地理编码地址数据的有效且可靠的替代方案?
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Apr 10;3(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2946.
7
Opioid prescribing by multiple providers in Medicare: retrospective observational study of insurance claims.医疗保险中多名提供者开具阿片类药物处方的情况:保险索赔的回顾性观察性研究。
BMJ. 2014 Feb 19;348:g1393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1393.
8
Benefits of deprescribing on patients' adherence to medications.减药对患者药物依从性的益处。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Feb;36(1):26-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9871-z.
9
Using administrative data to identify naturally occurring networks of physicians.利用管理数据识别自然形成的医师网络。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8):715-21. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182977991.
10
Doctor shopping: a concept analysis.医生购物:一项概念分析
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2012;26(4):262-78. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.26.4.262.