Bhandari Misha, Wilson Chad, Rifkind Kenneth, DiMaggio Charles, Ayoung-Chee Patricia
Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; New York Presbyterian, The University Hospital of Columbia and Cornell, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York.
Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
J Surg Res. 2017 Nov;219:253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.100. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
Previous studies have reported that same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is superior to delayed elective cholecystectomy. Although this practice is ideal, it requires significant hospital resources, particularly for an underprivileged inner-city population at a large, municipal hospital. We sought to evaluate the implementation of same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a large, municipal hospital and assess the possible benefits of decreasing preoperative length of stay (LOS), particularly its effect on operative time and length of stay in patients with acute cholecystitis.
This was a retrospective chart review of patients treated for symptomatic gallstone disease between September 2012 and November 2013. Medical records were reviewed, and relevant data points were collected. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to assess the correlation between time to operation (<36 h [no delay] or >36 h [delay]) and the main outcomes (operative time and total length of stay). Inclusion criteria were patients age ≥18 y who underwent same-admission cholecystectomy and had a diagnosis of cholecystitis on pathology. Eighty-eight patients met all inclusion criteria.
The mean (standard deviation) preoperative LOS was 76.2 (±48.6) h, the mean operative time was 2.3 (±1.1) h, and the mean postoperative LOS was 60.3 (±60.1) h. The average total LOS was 136 (±79.8) h. Operative times and postoperative LOS were similar for patients in the delay and no delay groups. Patients with >36 h wait before surgery had a total length of stay twice as long as patients with <36 h wait (152 versus 83.3 h; P = 0.0005). These findings remained significant when adjusted for age, sex, radiologic findings, number of preoperative tests, and pathology.
Increased preoperative LOS is not associated with a significant increase in operative time. However, it was associated with significantly increased length of stay. Further analysis is needed to explore the potential cost savings of decreasing preoperative LOS.
既往研究报道,急性胆囊炎同日腹腔镜胆囊切除术优于延期择期胆囊切除术。尽管这种做法很理想,但它需要大量医院资源,尤其是对于大型市级医院中贫困的市中心区人群而言。我们试图评估在一家大型市级医院实施同日腹腔镜胆囊切除术的情况,并评估缩短术前住院时间(LOS)可能带来的益处,特别是其对急性胆囊炎患者手术时间和住院时间的影响。
这是一项对2012年9月至2013年11月间因有症状胆结石疾病接受治疗的患者进行的回顾性病历审查。审查了医疗记录并收集了相关数据点。进行单因素和多因素回归分析以评估手术时间(<36小时[无延迟]或>36小时[延迟])与主要结局(手术时间和总住院时间)之间的相关性。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁、接受同次入院胆囊切除术且病理诊断为胆囊炎的患者。88例患者符合所有纳入标准。
术前平均(标准差)住院时间为76.2(±48.6)小时,平均手术时间为2.3(±1.1)小时,术后平均住院时间为60.3(±60.1)小时。平均总住院时间为136(±79.8)小时。延迟组和无延迟组患者的手术时间和术后住院时间相似。术前等待>36小时的患者总住院时间是等待<36小时患者的两倍(152对83.3小时;P = 0.0005)。在对年龄、性别、影像学检查结果、术前检查次数和病理进行校正后,这些结果仍然显著。
术前住院时间增加与手术时间显著增加无关。然而,它与住院时间显著延长有关。需要进一步分析以探讨缩短术前住院时间可能节省的成本。