Suppr超能文献

国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)4级——一组同质的前列腺癌?

ISUP Group 4 - a Homogenous Group of Prostate Cancers?

作者信息

Lu Thomas Chengxuan, Moretti Kim, Beckmann Kerri, Cohen Penelope, O'Callaghan Michael

机构信息

University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Pathol Oncol Res. 2018 Oct;24(4):921-925. doi: 10.1007/s12253-017-0331-2. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

Abstract

The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and the World Health Organisation have adopted a five-tiered prognostic grade group for prostate cancer in 2014. Grade group 4 is comprised of Gleason patterns 4 + 4, 3 + 5 and 5 + 3. Recent articles have suggested heterogeneity in their prognostic outcomes. We aimed to determine whether there was a difference in mortality outcomes within the ISUP 4 grouping, as identified on needle biopsy. A total of 4080 men who were diagnosed with non-metastatic (N0 M0) prostate cancer on biopsy with Gleason scores of 7, 8 and 9 were included. Multi-variable Cox Regression and Fine and Grey competing risk analysis were used to determine the All-Cause Mortality (ACM) and the Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality (PCSM) as a function of Gleason Scores (Gleason 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 4 + 4, 3 + 5/5 + 3, 9). Gleason score 4 + 4 was utilized as the referent. The 60 months' prostate cancer specific mortality with Gleason patterns 4 + 4 and 3 + 5/5 + 3 were 17% and 20% respectively (P < 0.01). Patients with 3 + 5/5 + 3 disease, had no statistically significant difference in the ACM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.68-1.4, p = 0.99) and PCSM risk (aHR 0.77, 95% Cl 0.47-1.2, p = 0.31) when compare with the referent group of patients. Patients with Gleason patterns 4 + 3 and 9 had statistically significant difference in their PCSM risk (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.91, P < 0.001 and aHR 1.5, 95% Cl 1.2-1.9, P < 0.001) when compared to the referent group. Our analysis suggest that ISUP group 4 is homogenous in terms of the all-cause mortality and the prostate cancer specific morality risk as differentiated by the presence of Gleason 5 score.

摘要

国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)和世界卫生组织于2014年采用了前列腺癌的五级预后分级组。4级组由 Gleason 模式 4 + 4、3 + 5 和 5 + 3 组成。近期文章表明它们的预后结果存在异质性。我们旨在确定在针吸活检中确定的 ISUP 4 级分组内的死亡率结果是否存在差异。共纳入了4080名经活检诊断为非转移性(N0 M0)前列腺癌且 Gleason 评分为7、8和9的男性。采用多变量 Cox 回归和 Fine 和 Grey 竞争风险分析来确定全因死亡率(ACM)和前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)与 Gleason 评分(Gleason 3 + 4、4 + 3、4 + 4、3 + 5/5 + 3、9)的函数关系。将 Gleason 评分 4 + 4 用作参照。Gleason 模式 4 + 4 和 3 + 5/5 + 3 的60个月前列腺癌特异性死亡率分别为17%和20%(P < 0.01)。与参照组患者相比,3 + 5/5 + 3 疾病患者的 ACM(调整后风险比[aHR] 0.99,95%置信区间[Cl] 0.68 - 1.4,p = 0.99)和 PCSM 风险(aHR 0.77,95% Cl 0.47 - 1.2,p = 0.31)无统计学显著差异。与参照组相比,Gleason 模式 4 + 3 和 9 的患者在其 PCSM 风险方面存在统计学显著差异(aHR 0.70,95% CI 0.54 - 0.91,P < 0.001 和 aHR 1.5,95% Cl 1.2 - 1.9,P < 0.001)。我们的分析表明,就全因死亡率和前列腺癌特异性死亡风险而言,ISUP 4级组根据是否存在 Gleason 5评分是同质的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验