• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足部功能指数修订版（FFI-R）的翻译、文化调适与效度验证

TRANSLATION, CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE FOOT FUNCTION INDEX - REVISED (FFI-R).

作者信息

Stéfani Kelly Cristina, Pereira Miguel Viana, Oliveira Pedro Rizzi, Wun Paloma Yan Lam

机构信息

. Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Grupo de Pé e Tornozelo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Ortop Bras. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(5):188-193. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220172505172107.

DOI:10.1590/1413-785220172505172107
PMID:29081702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5608736/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the "Foot Function Index - Revised" (FFI-R) for use in Brazilian Portuguese.

METHODS

The scale was translated and administered (as recommended by Guillemin, 2000) to 52 patients in the postoperative period after foot and ankle surgery. Seven days after the initial assessment, the scale was readministered by a different interviewer. The data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 software for Mac. Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation analysis.

RESULTS

were considered statistically significant at a type I error rate of 5%. Results: The following random-effects intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were obtained for each score on the FFI-R: 0.625 for pain, 0.558 for stiffness, 0.757 for difficulty, 0.718 for activity restrictions, 0.854 for personal concerns, and 0.753 for the total score.

CONCLUSION

The FFI-R was successfully translated to Portuguese and culturally adapted for use in Brazilian patients, demonstrating satisfactory validity and reliability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在翻译、进行文化调适并验证用于巴西葡萄牙语的“足部功能指数修订版”（FFI-R）。

方法

按照吉勒明（2000年）的建议对该量表进行翻译，并施用于52例足踝手术后的患者。初次评估7天后，由另一名访谈者再次施测该量表。数据录入Excel电子表格，并使用适用于Mac的SPSS 23.0软件进行分析。使用组内相关分析评估可重复性。

结果

在5%的I型错误率水平上被认为具有统计学意义。结果：FFI-R各得分的组内相关系数（ICC）如下：疼痛为0.625，僵硬为0.558，困难为0.757，活动受限为0.718，个人担忧为0.854，总分是0.753。

结论

FFI-R已成功翻译成葡萄牙语并进行了文化调适，适用于巴西患者，显示出令人满意的效度和信度。

相似文献

1
TRANSLATION, CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE FOOT FUNCTION INDEX - REVISED (FFI-R).足部功能指数修订版（FFI-R）的翻译、文化调适与效度验证
Acta Ortop Bras. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(5):188-193. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220172505172107.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index for use in German-speaking patients with foot complaints.足部功能指数在德语区足部疾病患者中的跨文化适应性及效度验证
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Dec;29(12):1222-8. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.1222.
3
Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version.足部功能指数（FFI）问卷巴西葡萄牙语版本的有效性和可靠性。
Springerplus. 2016 Oct 18;5(1):1810. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3507-4. eCollection 2016.
4
Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders.土耳其版足部功能指数修订版在足部和踝关节疾病患者中的验证。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Aug;26(6):624-629. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases.意大利版足功能指数在足部和踝关节疾病患者中的可靠性、有效性和反应度。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0435-4. Epub 2013 May 21.
6
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the lower extremity functional scale into a Brazilian Portuguese version and validation on patients with knee injuries.下肢功能量表的巴西葡萄牙语版翻译与跨文化调适及其在膝关节损伤患者中的验证。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Nov;42(11):932-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4101. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
7
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of FFI to Brazilian Portuguese version: FFI - Brazil.将《疲劳严重程度量表》（FFI）翻译并跨文化改编为巴西葡萄牙语版本：《疲劳严重程度量表》-巴西版。
Rev Bras Reumatol. 2015 Sep-Oct;55(5):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.11.004. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and multi-centric validation of the Italian version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS).跟腱完全断裂评分（ATRS）意大利版的跨文化调适和多中心验证。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Mar;26(3):854-861. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4152-8. Epub 2016 May 2.
9
Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Clinimetric Testing of Instruments Used to Assess Patients With Ankle Sprain in the Brazilian Population.将评估踝关节扭伤患者的仪器在巴西人群中的翻译、跨文化适应性和计量学测试。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Dec;46(12):1042-1050. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6218. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
French validation of the Foot Function Index (FFI).《足部功能指数（FFI）的法语版验证》
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Oct;58(5):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Arthroereisis with a Talar Screw in Symptomatic Flexible Flatfoot in Children.儿童症状性柔韧性扁平足的距骨螺钉关节制动术
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 2;12(23):7475. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237475.
2
"Psychometric properties of the Norwegian foot function index revised short form".《挪威足部功能指数修订短式的心理测量学特性》。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 3;23(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05374-x.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Foot Function Index in Patients with Foot Disorders.足部功能指数波斯语版本在足部疾病患者中的信度和效度
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 May;7(3):291-296.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of FFI to Brazilian Portuguese version: FFI - Brazil.将《疲劳严重程度量表》（FFI）翻译并跨文化改编为巴西葡萄牙语版本：《疲劳严重程度量表》-巴西版。
Rev Bras Reumatol. 2015 Sep-Oct;55(5):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.11.004. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
2
A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.足部功能指数和足部功能指数修订版的综述。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2013 Feb 1;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-5.
3
Comparison of different outcome instruments following foot and ankle trauma.比较足部和踝关节创伤后不同结局评估工具。
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Dec;31(12):1075-80. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.1075.
4
A systematic review of instruments measuring foot function, foot pain, and foot-related disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.一项关于测量类风湿性关节炎患者足部功能、足部疼痛及足部相关残疾的工具的系统综述。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1257-69. doi: 10.1002/art.24016.
5
Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.美国矫形足踝协会临床评分量表主观部分的信度与效度
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;46(2):65-74. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.12.002.
6
Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.足与踝关节手术后足部功能指数、美国足踝外科协会临床评分系统及健康调查简表-36的反应性
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Nov;27(11):930-4. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701111.
7
Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index.用于开发修订版足部功能指数的理论模型与拉施分析
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jul;27(7):519-27. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700707.
8
Evaluation of the validity of the Foot Function Index in measuring outcomes in patients with foot and ankle disorders.足功能指数在测量足踝疾病患者治疗结果中的有效性评估。
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jan;27(1):38-42. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700107.
9
Reliability of the Foot Function Index:: A report of the AOFAS Outcomes Committee.足部功能指数的可靠性：美国足踝外科协会（AOFAS）结果委员会报告
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):962-7. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601112.
10
Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members.一项互联网调查的结果，该调查确定了美国足踝外科协会（AOFAS）成员最常使用的踝关节评分。
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Jun;26(6):479-82. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600609.