Young K E, Soussi I, Toumi M
Pricing, Reimbursement, and Market Access, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Pricing, Reimbursement, and Market Access, Creativ-Ceutical, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Sep 3;5(1):1369817. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1369817. eCollection 2017.
: The study compared the relative cost differences of similar orphan drugs among high and low GDP countries in Europe: Bulgaria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, UK. : Annual treatment costs per patient were calculated. Relative costs were computed by dividing the costs by each economic parameter: nominal GDP per capita, GDP in PPP per capita, % GDP contributed by the government, government budget per inhabitant, % GDP spent on healthcare, % GDP spent on pharmaceuticals, and average annual salary. An international comparison of the relative costs was done using UK as the reference country and results were analysed descriptively. : 120 orphan drugs were included. The median annual costs of orphan drugs in all countries varied minimally (cost ratios: 0.87 to 1.08). When the costs were adjusted using GDP per capita, the EU-5 and Nordic countries maintained minimal difference in median cost. However, the lower GDP countries showed three to six times higher relative costs. The same pattern was evident when costs were adjusted using the other economic parameters. : When the country's ability to pay is taken into consideration, lower GDP countries pay relatively higher costs for similarly available orphan drugs in Europe.
该研究比较了欧洲高GDP国家和低GDP国家(保加利亚、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、意大利、挪威、波兰、罗马尼亚、西班牙、瑞典、英国)中类似孤儿药的相对成本差异:计算了每位患者的年度治疗成本。通过将成本除以每个经济参数来计算相对成本:人均名义GDP、人均购买力平价GDP、政府贡献的GDP百分比、人均政府预算、医疗保健支出占GDP的百分比、药品支出占GDP的百分比以及平均年薪。以英国为参考国家进行了相对成本的国际比较,并对结果进行了描述性分析。纳入了120种孤儿药。所有国家孤儿药的年度成本中位数差异极小(成本比:0.87至1.08)。当使用人均GDP进行成本调整时,欧盟五国和北欧国家的成本中位数差异最小。然而,低GDP国家的相对成本高出三到六倍。当使用其他经济参数进行成本调整时,同样的模式也很明显。考虑到国家的支付能力,低GDP国家为欧洲同样可得的孤儿药支付相对更高的成本。