Kim Na-Kyoung
College of Law, Sungshin University, Seoul 02844, Korea.
Dev Reprod. 2017 Sep;21(3):343-349. doi: 10.12717/DR.2017.21.3.343. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
With the development of the third-generation gene scissors, CRISPR-Cas9, concerns are being raised about ethical and social repercussions of the new gene-editing technology. In this situation, this article explores the legislation and interpretation of the positive laws in South Korea. The BioAct does not specify and regulate 'gene editing' itself. However, assuming that genetic editing is used in the process of research and treatment, we can look to the specific details of the regulations for research on humans as well as gene therapy research in order to see how genetic editing is regulated under the BioAct. BioAct differentiates the regulation between (born) humans and embryos etc. and the regulation differ entirely in the manner and scope. Moreover, due to the fact that gene therapy products are regarded as drugs, they fall under different regulations. The Korean Pharmacopoeia Act put stringent sanctions on clinical trials for gene therapy products and the official Notification "Approval and Examination Regulations for Biological Products, etc." by Food and Drug Safety Administration may be applied to gene editing for gene therapy purposes.
随着第三代基因剪刀CRISPR-Cas9的发展,人们对这种新的基因编辑技术的伦理和社会影响日益担忧。在此情形下,本文探讨了韩国实证法的立法与解释。《生物法》并未明确规定和规范“基因编辑”本身。然而,假设在研究和治疗过程中使用了基因编辑,我们可以参考人类研究以及基因治疗研究的具体监管细节,以便了解《生物法》对基因编辑是如何进行监管的。《生物法》区分了对(已出生)人类和胚胎等的监管,且监管方式和范围完全不同。此外,由于基因治疗产品被视为药品,它们受不同法规的约束。《韩国药典法》对基因治疗产品的临床试验实施了严格制裁,食品药品安全管理局发布的官方通知《生物制品等的审批和检验规定》可能适用于用于基因治疗目的的基因编辑。