• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Gene-Editing: Interpretation of Current Law and Legal Policy.基因编辑:现行法律及法律政策解读
Dev Reprod. 2017 Sep;21(3):343-349. doi: 10.12717/DR.2017.21.3.343. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
2
Gene Editing in Clinical Practice: Where are We?临床实践中的基因编辑:我们目前处于什么阶段?
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2019 Jan;34(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/s12291-018-0804-4. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
3
Cutting edges and weaving threads in the gene editing (Я)evolution: reconciling scientific progress with legal, ethical, and social concerns.基因编辑(Я)演进中的前沿与脉络:协调科学进步与法律、伦理和社会关切
J Law Biosci. 2018 Jan 18;5(1):35-83. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsx043. eCollection 2018 May.
4
Bioethical issues in genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 technology.CRISPR-Cas9技术在基因组编辑中的生物伦理问题。
Turk J Biol. 2020 Apr 2;44(2):110-120. doi: 10.3906/biy-1912-52. eCollection 2020.
5
Embryonic Regulation and Research: What Is the Status of Human Germline Genome Editing in Australia?胚胎调控与研究:澳大利亚人类生殖系基因组编辑的现状如何?
J Law Med. 2020 Apr;27(3):718-740.
6
CRISPR-Cas9 and the Promise of a Better Future.CRISPR-Cas9与美好未来的前景。
Eur J Health Law. 2019 Oct 4;26(4):308-329. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12264438.
7
Legality of Embryonic Gene Editing in Australia.澳大利亚胚胎基因编辑的合法性
J Law Med. 2018 Dec;26(2):356-373.
8
[Early achievements of the Danish pharmaceutical industry--8. Lundbeck].[丹麦制药行业的早期成就——8. 灵北公司]
Theriaca. 2016(43):9-61.
9
Science and Bioethics of CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing: An Analysis Towards Separating Facts and Fiction.CRISPR-Cas9基因编辑的科学与生物伦理学:区分事实与虚构的分析
Yale J Biol Med. 2017 Dec 19;90(4):625-634. eCollection 2017 Dec.
10
[Genome Editing with CRISPR/Cas9: First Steps Towards a new Era in Medicine?].[利用CRISPR/Cas9进行基因组编辑:迈向医学新时代的第一步?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2019 Feb;144(4):276-281. doi: 10.1055/a-0759-7180. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Wheat Starch Metabolism in Properties, Environmental Stress Condition, and Molecular Approaches for Value-Added Utilization.了解小麦淀粉在特性、环境胁迫条件下的代谢以及增值利用的分子方法。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Oct 25;10(11):2282. doi: 10.3390/plants10112282.
2
Ethical Challenges of Germline Genetic Enhancement.生殖系基因增强的伦理挑战。
Front Genet. 2019 Sep 3;10:767. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00767. eCollection 2019.

基因编辑:现行法律及法律政策解读

Gene-Editing: Interpretation of Current Law and Legal Policy.

作者信息

Kim Na-Kyoung

机构信息

College of Law, Sungshin University, Seoul 02844, Korea.

出版信息

Dev Reprod. 2017 Sep;21(3):343-349. doi: 10.12717/DR.2017.21.3.343. Epub 2017 Sep 30.

DOI:10.12717/DR.2017.21.3.343
PMID:29082350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5651701/
Abstract

With the development of the third-generation gene scissors, CRISPR-Cas9, concerns are being raised about ethical and social repercussions of the new gene-editing technology. In this situation, this article explores the legislation and interpretation of the positive laws in South Korea. The BioAct does not specify and regulate 'gene editing' itself. However, assuming that genetic editing is used in the process of research and treatment, we can look to the specific details of the regulations for research on humans as well as gene therapy research in order to see how genetic editing is regulated under the BioAct. BioAct differentiates the regulation between (born) humans and embryos etc. and the regulation differ entirely in the manner and scope. Moreover, due to the fact that gene therapy products are regarded as drugs, they fall under different regulations. The Korean Pharmacopoeia Act put stringent sanctions on clinical trials for gene therapy products and the official Notification "Approval and Examination Regulations for Biological Products, etc." by Food and Drug Safety Administration may be applied to gene editing for gene therapy purposes.

摘要

随着第三代基因剪刀CRISPR-Cas9的发展,人们对这种新的基因编辑技术的伦理和社会影响日益担忧。在此情形下,本文探讨了韩国实证法的立法与解释。《生物法》并未明确规定和规范“基因编辑”本身。然而,假设在研究和治疗过程中使用了基因编辑,我们可以参考人类研究以及基因治疗研究的具体监管细节,以便了解《生物法》对基因编辑是如何进行监管的。《生物法》区分了对(已出生)人类和胚胎等的监管,且监管方式和范围完全不同。此外,由于基因治疗产品被视为药品,它们受不同法规的约束。《韩国药典法》对基因治疗产品的临床试验实施了严格制裁,食品药品安全管理局发布的官方通知《生物制品等的审批和检验规定》可能适用于用于基因治疗目的的基因编辑。