Suppr超能文献

急诊科疼痛及疼痛管理的前瞻性分析

Prospective analysis of pain and pain management in an emergency department.

作者信息

Leigheb Massimiliano, Sabbatini Maurizio, Baldrighi Marco, Hasenboehler Erik A, Briacca Luca, Grassi Federico, Cannas Mario, Avanzi Giancarlo, Castello Luigi Mario

机构信息

.

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 18;88(4S):19-30. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i4-S.6790.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

The aim of pain management in the Emergency Department (ED) is to temporarily optimize patient quality of life by reducing acute discomfort. The goals of this study were to evaluate the intensity and location of pain experienced by patients in the ED, the time to analgesia administration in the ED, and the patient's satisfaction so to identify potential useful interventions to improve pain management.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on the intensity of pain experienced by 137 patients during their ED stays using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patients were further stratified by pain intensity according to three categories, and by cause of pain.

RESULTS

NRS pain measurements were higher than VAS measurements. Patients who took pain medication within a few hours before their ED visit had a higher mean VAS score at arrival in comparison to patients who did not. Patients treated with pain medications, compared to the non-treated, had more pain at arrival; abdominal pain was treated earlier than non-abdominal pain, whereas no difference in timing of medication administration was noted between traumatic and non-traumatic pain. Among the  hospitalized patients, the chest was the most common location of pain; these patients had lower NRS scores than non-hospitalized patients. Patients with mild to moderate pain were more satisfied then those with severe pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrepancy between NRS and VAS scores suggests that pain intensity cannot be determined accurately according to pain scale data alone but should also incorporate clinical judgment.

摘要

工作背景与目的

急诊科疼痛管理的目的是通过减轻急性不适来暂时优化患者的生活质量。本研究的目的是评估急诊科患者疼痛的强度和部位、在急诊科给予镇痛治疗的时间以及患者的满意度,以便确定潜在的有益干预措施来改善疼痛管理。

方法

我们前瞻性地收集了137例患者在急诊科就诊期间使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和数字评分法(NRS)所经历疼痛强度的数据。患者还根据疼痛强度分为三类,并按疼痛原因进行分层。

结果

NRS疼痛测量值高于VAS测量值。与未在就诊前几小时内服用止痛药物的患者相比,在就诊前几小时内服用止痛药物的患者到达时的平均VAS评分更高。与未接受治疗的患者相比,接受止痛药物治疗的患者到达时疼痛更严重;腹痛比非腹痛治疗更早,而创伤性疼痛和非创伤性疼痛在用药时间上没有差异。在住院患者中,胸部是最常见的疼痛部位;这些患者的NRS评分低于非住院患者。轻度至中度疼痛的患者比重度疼痛的患者更满意。

结论

NRS和VAS评分之间的差异表明,疼痛强度不能仅根据疼痛量表数据准确确定,还应结合临床判断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b9/6357652/2fc73e02f5ab/ACTA-88-19-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验