• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
New Instrument to Measure Hospital Patient Experiences in Flanders.用于衡量佛兰德地区医院患者体验的新工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 30;14(11):1319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111319.
2
Validation of the Child HCAHPS survey to measure pediatric inpatient experience of care in Flanders.验证儿童医疗保健消费者评估调查(Child HCAHPS)以衡量佛兰德地区儿科住院患者的护理体验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;176(7):935-945. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2919-7. Epub 2017 May 24.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
The Development of a Pediatric Inpatient Experience of Care Measure: Child HCAHPS.儿科住院患者护理体验指标的发展:儿童医疗保健消费者评价(Child HCAHPS)
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):360-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0966. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
5
Revision Versus Primary Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Scores in Total Joint Arthroplasty.翻修与初次就诊患者对医疗保健提供者和系统评分在全膝关节置换术中的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S84-S90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.019. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Predicting Inpatient Dissatisfaction Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 3,593 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey Responses.预测全膝关节置换术后患者的不满:对 3593 份医院消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统调查回复的分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 May;34(5):824-833. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Patient perception of pain care in the United States: a 5-year comparative analysis of hospital consumer assessment of health care providers and systems.美国患者对疼痛护理的感知:对医院消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统的 5 年比较分析。
Pain Physician. 2014 Sep-Oct;17(5):369-77.
8
Variation in Family Experience of Pediatric Inpatient Care As Measured by Child HCAHPS.通过儿童医疗保健消费者评估调查(Child HCAHPS)衡量的儿科住院护理家庭体验差异。
Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3372. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
9
Influence of length of stay on patient satisfaction with hospital care in Japan.住院时间对日本患者住院护理满意度的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Dec;14(6):493-502. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.6.493.
10
Impact of Cross-level Measurement Noninvariance on Hospital Rankings Based on Patient Experiences With Care in 7 European Countries.基于7个欧洲国家患者护理体验的跨层次测量非不变性对医院排名的影响
Med Care. 2017 Dec;55(12):e150-e157. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000580.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review.成人住院患者自我报告的体验指标:一项系统综述
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Nov 23;2024:5166392. doi: 10.1155/jonm/5166392. eCollection 2024.
2
Identifying Patient-Reported Care Experiences in Free-Text Survey Comments: Topic Modeling Study.在自由文本调查评论中识别患者报告的护理体验:主题建模研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Feb 24;13:e63466. doi: 10.2196/63466.
3
Comparing healthcare quality: A common framework for both ordinal and cardinal data with an application to primary care variation in England.比较医疗质量:一种用于序数和基数数据的通用框架及其在英国初级保健差异中的应用。
Health Econ. 2022 Dec;31(12):2593-2608. doi: 10.1002/hec.4597. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
4
Validation and Adjustment of the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ): A Regional Hospital Study in Norway.验证和调整患者体验问卷(PEQ):挪威一家地区医院的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;18(13):7141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137141.
5
Patient Satisfaction With Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment via Telemedicine: Brief Literature Review and Development of a New Assessment.患者对通过远程医疗治疗阿片类药物使用障碍药物的满意度:简要文献综述及新评估方法的制定。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;8:557275. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.557275. eCollection 2020.
6
Six years of measuring patient experiences in Belgium: Limited improvement and lack of association with improvement strategies.比利时六年的患者体验测量:改善有限,且与改善策略缺乏关联。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 3;15(11):e0241408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241408. eCollection 2020.
7
A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.患者报告体验测量的有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1023-1035. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13187. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Cross-level Measurement Noninvariance on Hospital Rankings Based on Patient Experiences With Care in 7 European Countries.基于7个欧洲国家患者护理体验的跨层次测量非不变性对医院排名的影响
Med Care. 2017 Dec;55(12):e150-e157. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000580.
2
Patient experiences with care across various types of mental health care: Questionnaire development, measurement invariance, and patients' reports.患者在各类精神卫生保健中的体验:问卷编制、测量不变性及患者报告。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1592. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
3
Payment Power to the Patients.将支付权赋予患者。
JAMA. 2017 Jul 4;318(1):18-19. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7533.
4
The Effects of Pay-for-Performance Programs on Health, Health Care Use, and Processes of Care: A Systematic Review.绩效薪酬计划对健康、医疗保健利用和医疗服务流程的影响:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 7;166(5):341-353. doi: 10.7326/M16-1881. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Patient Hospital Experience Improved Modestly, But No Evidence Medicare Incentives Promoted Meaningful Gains.患者的医院体验略有改善,但没有证据表明医疗保险激励措施带来了显著收益。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):133-140. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0808.
6
Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings.关于在医疗环境中使用患者体验数据进行质量改进的方法的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 16;6(8):e011907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011907.
7
Interventions to improve hospital patient satisfaction with healthcare providers and systems: a systematic review.提高医院患者对医疗服务提供者及医疗系统满意度的干预措施:一项系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):596-606. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004758. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
9
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.结构模型评估与修正:一种区间估计方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
10
Fit Indexes, Lagrange Multipliers, Constraint Changes and Incomplete Data in Structural Models.结构模型中的拟合指数、拉格朗日乘数、约束变化和不完整数据。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):163-72. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_3.

用于衡量佛兰德地区医院患者体验的新工具。

New Instrument to Measure Hospital Patient Experiences in Flanders.

作者信息

Bruyneel Luk, Tambuyzer Else, Coeckelberghs Ellen, De Wachter Dirk, Sermeus Walter, De Ridder Dirk, Ramaekers Dirk, Weeghmans Ilse, Vanhaecht Kris

机构信息

KU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Flemish Patient Platform, Groenveldstraat 15, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 30;14(11):1319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111319.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14111319
PMID:29084160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5707958/
Abstract

Implementing a standardized patient experience survey may initiate a process to apply pressure on hospitals to attend to improving patient experiences. In Flanders, Belgium, the Flemish Patient Survey was developed between 2011 and 2015. A preliminary version was developed from a scoping review and patient and expert focus groups, and included 27 items for eight hypothesized dimensions: 'preparing for hospital stay', 'information and communication', 'coordination', 'respect', 'privacy', 'safe care', pain management', and 'participation'. Exploratory factor analysis for 1076 patients in 17 hospitals found that the data did not fit the dimensions. Adaptations in item wording and response categories were based on the US Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems. The revised version showed excellent model fit in 22,143 patients in 37 hospitals. Multiple group analysis pointed to evidence of measurement invariance over time across mode of administration, type of nursing unit, and various patient characteristics. Fostering a collaborative approach thus proved successful in implementing a standardized patient experience survey. The most recent findings (2016) illustrate substandard performance and a need for patient-mix adjustment. The Flemish government developed a dedicated website to make findings publicly available and the federal government currently considers patient experiences in devising a pay-for-quality scheme.

摘要

实施标准化的患者体验调查可能会启动一个向医院施压以改善患者体验的过程。在比利时的弗拉芒地区,2011年至2015年间开展了弗拉芒患者调查。其初稿基于范围综述以及患者和专家焦点小组制定,包含针对八个假设维度的27个项目:“住院准备”“信息与沟通”“协调”“尊重”“隐私”“安全护理”“疼痛管理”和“参与”。对17家医院的1076名患者进行的探索性因素分析发现,数据并不符合这些维度。项目措辞和回答类别根据美国医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估进行了调整。修订版在37家医院的22143名患者中显示出极佳的模型拟合度。多组分析表明,在管理模式、护理单元类型和各种患者特征方面,随时间推移存在测量不变性的证据。因此,事实证明采用协作方法成功实施了标准化的患者体验调查。最新研究结果(2016年)表明存在表现不佳的情况,且需要对患者组合进行调整。弗拉芒政府设立了一个专门网站来公开研究结果,联邦政府目前在设计质量付费计划时会考虑患者体验。