• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Work Engagement in Serbia: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES).塞尔维亚的工作投入:乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)塞尔维亚语版的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 16;8:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799. eCollection 2017.
2
Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.我们是否都认同如何衡量工作投入度?作为一种标准测量工具的乌得勒支工作投入量表的因素效度——一项文献综述。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Mar 30;30(2):161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.越南语版 9 项工作投入量表的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157.
4
The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9S): Factorial Validity, Reliability, and Measurement Invariance in a Chilean Sample of Undergraduate University Students.乌得勒支大学生工作投入量表(UWES-9S):智利本科大学生样本中的因子效度、信度和测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 30;10:1017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01017. eCollection 2019.
5
Measuring engagement at work: validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.工作投入度的测量:《乌德勒支工作投入量表》中文版的验证。
Int J Behav Med. 2012 Sep;19(3):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6.
6
[Measuring the positive dimensions among health care workers: a contribution to the Italian validation of the UWES--Utrecht Work Engagement Scale].[衡量医护人员的积极维度:对UWES(乌得勒支工作投入量表)意大利语版验证的贡献]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2008 Jan-Mar;30(1 Suppl A):A111-9.
7
One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale on a sample of Polish employees.工作投入的一维、二维还是三维?在波兰员工样本中检验乌得勒支工作投入量表的因子效度。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 Jun;25(2):241-249. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1371958. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
8
Measuring work engagement in Thailand: development and validation testing of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Thai version (UWES-TH).测量泰国的工作投入:泰国版乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-TH)的开发和验证测试。
Ind Health. 2024 Jun 1;62(3):182-194. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2023-0017. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
9
Validity and reliability of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student Version in Sri Lanka.乌得勒支工作投入量表学生版在斯里兰卡的效度和信度
BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 4;11(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3388-4.
10
Psychometric Properties of Spanish Version Student Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-S-9) in High-school Students.高中生西班牙语版学生乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-S-9)的心理测量特性。
Span J Psychol. 2019 May 13;22:E21. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.25.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional labor and empathic concern as predictors of exhaustion and disengagement in college teachers.情绪劳动和共情关注作为大学教师倦怠和工作投入度的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 19;15(1):26281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11304-3.
2
Satisfaction with clinical pathway implementation versus job performance of clinicians: empirical evidence on the mediating role of work engagement from public hospitals in Sichuan, China.临床路径实施满意度与临床医生工作绩效:来自中国四川公立医院工作投入中介作用的实证证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 16;24(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10856-w.
3
Measuring work engagement in Thailand: development and validation testing of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Thai version (UWES-TH).测量泰国的工作投入:泰国版乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-TH)的开发和验证测试。
Ind Health. 2024 Jun 1;62(3):182-194. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2023-0017. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
The core self-evaluations, psychological capital, and academic engagement: a cross-national mediation model.核心自我评价、心理资本与学业投入:一个跨国中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1189665. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189665. eCollection 2023.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a Sample of Active Health Care Professionals in Spain.西班牙在职医护人员样本中乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-9)的心理测量特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Nov 30;15:3461-3472. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S387242. eCollection 2022.
6
Work engagement, emotional disorders and conflict management styles in paediatric nurse: A mediating effect model.儿科护士工作投入、情绪障碍与冲突管理风格:中介效应模型。
Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):2264-2272. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1480. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
7
Work engagement and associated factors among dental nurses in China.中国牙科护士的工作投入及相关因素。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01766-y.
8
Effects of Organizational Support and Organizational Justice on Police Officers' Work Engagement.组织支持与组织公正对警察工作投入的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 21;12:642155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642155. eCollection 2021.
9
Having the Cake and Eating It Too: First-Order, Second-Order and Bifactor Representations of Work Engagement.鱼与熊掌兼得:工作投入的一阶、二阶和双因素模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:615581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615581. eCollection 2021.
10
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.越南语版 9 项工作投入量表的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157.

本文引用的文献

1
Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions.构建工作投入度:一项关于工作投入干预效果的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Organ Behav. 2017 Jul;38(6):792-812. doi: 10.1002/job.2167. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
2
Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.我们是否都认同如何衡量工作投入度?作为一种标准测量工具的乌得勒支工作投入量表的因素效度——一项文献综述。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Mar 30;30(2):161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Rocking at 81 and Rolling at 34: ROC Cut-Off Scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised in Serbia.81岁时摇摆,34岁时翻滚:塞尔维亚修订版消极行为问卷的ROC临界值分数
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 9;7:2058. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02058. eCollection 2016.
4
Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.工作需求-资源理论:总结与展望。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
5
Economic Crisis, Austerity Policies, Health and Fairness: Lessons Learned in Spain.经济危机、紧缩政策、健康与公平:西班牙的经验教训
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Feb;15(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0263-0.
6
The correlation between stress and economic crisis: a systematic review.压力与经济危机之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Apr 21;12:983-93. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S98525. eCollection 2016.
7
Validation of Nepalese version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.验证尼泊尔语版乌得勒支工作投入量表。
J Occup Health. 2014;56(6):421-9. doi: 10.1539/joh.14-0041-OA. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
Economic stress in the workplace: The impact of fear of the crisis on mental health.职场中的经济压力:对危机的恐惧对心理健康的影响。
Work. 2015;51(1):135-42. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141844.
9
Measuring engagement at work: validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.工作投入度的测量:《乌德勒支工作投入量表》中文版的验证。
Int J Behav Med. 2012 Sep;19(3):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6.
10
Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology.工作投入:职业健康心理学中的一个新兴概念。
Biosci Trends. 2008 Feb;2(1):2.

塞尔维亚的工作投入:乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)塞尔维亚语版的心理测量特性

Work Engagement in Serbia: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES).

作者信息

Petrović Ivana B, Vukelić Milica, Čizmić Svetlana

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 16;8:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799
PMID:29085319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5650702/
Abstract

Work engagement is defined as a positive, affective-motivational state of work-related well-being characterized by vigor, dedication and absorption. The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) is the most frequently used measure of work engagement. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Serbian versions of the UWES-17 and UWES-9. The sample consisted of 860 employees from a number of organizations and jobs across Serbia. Based on the UWES-17 findings, the data confirm both the three-factor and one-factor solutions by giving a slight advantage to the three-factor solution. As for the UWES-9, based on the PCFA and CFA, the one-factor solution was obtained as the preferred one. Taking into account the UWES-9 reliability and correlation patterns of its subscales with other well-being variables, both one- and three-factor solutions of the UWES-9 are suggested for future research. Serbian versions of both the UWES-17 and UWES-9 have satisfactory psychometric properties with high reliability, factorial structure in line with the theoretical model, and good predictive validity. The study contributes to enhanced understanding of work engagement by offering an insight from the Serbian cultural and economic context, significantly different from the UWES originating setting. There is still a need for exploring how employees from Serbia conceptualize work engagement, as well as for further, more stringent investigating of the cultural invariance of the UWES factorial structure.

摘要

工作投入被定义为一种与工作相关的积极、情感动机状态的幸福感,其特征为活力、奉献和专注。乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)是最常用的工作投入测量工具。本研究的目的是分析UWES - 17和UWES - 9塞尔维亚语版本的心理测量特性。样本包括来自塞尔维亚多个组织和不同工作岗位的860名员工。基于UWES - 17的研究结果,数据通过略微倾向于三因素解决方案证实了三因素和单因素解决方案。至于UWES - 9,基于主成分因子分析(PCFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA),单因素解决方案被确定为首选。考虑到UWES - 9的可靠性及其子量表与其他幸福感变量的相关模式,建议在未来研究中同时采用UWES - 9的单因素和三因素解决方案。UWES - 17和UWES - 9的塞尔维亚语版本都具有令人满意的心理测量特性,具有高可靠性、符合理论模型的因子结构和良好的预测效度。该研究通过提供来自塞尔维亚文化和经济背景的见解,有助于增强对工作投入的理解,塞尔维亚文化和经济背景与UWES的起源背景有显著差异。仍有必要探索塞尔维亚员工如何概念化工作投入,以及进一步更严格地研究UWES因子结构的文化不变性。