• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测把关行为的筛查工具。

A screening tool for predicting gatekeeping behaviour.

作者信息

Snowden Austyn, Young Jenny

机构信息

Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh EH11 4BN UK.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2017 May 7;4(4):187-199. doi: 10.1002/nop2.83. eCollection 2017 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.83
PMID:29085645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5653390/
Abstract

AIM

To develop a typology and screening tool for gatekeeping behaviours by nurses responsible for recruitment in palliative care research.

DESIGN

Concurrent analysis.

METHOD

Two focus groups were conducted in 2015 with nine qualified hospice community nurses involved in recruitment to a trial in palliative care. The literature was searched for research into gatekeeping from 2000-2016. All narrative examples of gatekeeping activity were coded using gerunds. Common codes were then grouped and interpreted as a social process.

RESULTS

Gatekeeping is normal and should be expected. A continuum typology emerged, ranging from unintentional to active disengagement. Justification ranged from forgetting to deliberately not mentioning the study for fear of burdening patients. Viewing gatekeeping as a continuum allowed for the creation of a screening tool designed to collaboratively discuss and hence mitigate specific types of gatekeeping behaviour before they occur. This is a unique international contribution to this persistent issue.

摘要

目的

为姑息治疗研究中负责招募工作的护士的把关行为制定一种类型划分方法和筛选工具。

设计

同步分析。

方法

2015年对九名参与姑息治疗试验招募工作的合格临终关怀社区护士进行了两个焦点小组访谈。检索了2000年至2016年有关把关研究的文献。所有把关活动的叙述性例子都用动名词进行编码。然后将常见编码进行分组并解释为一个社会过程。

结果

把关是正常的,应该被预料到。出现了一种连续体类型划分,范围从不自觉到主动脱离。理由从忘记到故意不提该项研究以免给患者造成负担。将把关视为一个连续体有助于创建一种筛选工具,旨在进行协作讨论,从而在特定类型的把关行为发生之前加以缓解。这是对这一长期问题的独特国际贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a594/5653390/a085f78be5bf/NOP2-4-187-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a594/5653390/a085f78be5bf/NOP2-4-187-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a594/5653390/a085f78be5bf/NOP2-4-187-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A screening tool for predicting gatekeeping behaviour.一种用于预测把关行为的筛查工具。
Nurs Open. 2017 May 7;4(4):187-199. doi: 10.1002/nop2.83. eCollection 2017 Oct.
2
A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research.姑息治疗研究中守门现象原因的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):533-48. doi: 10.1177/0269216315616759. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Gatekeeping in cancer clinical trials in Canada: The ethics of recruiting the "ideal" patient.加拿大癌症临床试验中的把关:招募“理想”患者的伦理问题。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jun;9(12):4107-4113. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3031. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
5
Gatekeeping practices of nurses in operating rooms.手术室护士的把关行为
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jul;69(2):215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.023. Epub 2009 May 25.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition.《中国广东省守门人制度对初级保健质量的影响:使用初级保健评估工具-成人版的横断面研究》
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0982-z.
8
Primary care physicians' views about gatekeeping in clinical research recruitment: A qualitative study.基层医疗医生对临床研究招募中把关的看法:一项定性研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):99-105. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1305007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
9
Gatekeeping access to community mental health teams: a qualitative study.社区心理健康团队的准入把关:一项定性研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
10
Narratives and gatekeeping: making sense of triage nurses' practice.叙事与把关:理解分诊护士的实践
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Jun;40(5):892-906. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12732. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of a digital distress detection system in palliative care: qualitative data on perspectives of a multiprofessional palliative care team.姑息治疗中数字痛苦检测系统的实施:多专业姑息治疗团队观点的定性数据
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 7;23(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01530-3.
2
Implementation of remote home care: assessment guided by the RE-AIM framework.远程家庭护理的实施:基于 RE-AIM 框架的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10625-9.
3
Participant recruitment among vulnerable populations: An experience from a qualitative study among refugee adolescents in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
Two years of unintended consequences: introducing an electronic health record system in a hospice in Scotland.两年的意外后果:在苏格兰一家临终关怀医院引入电子健康记录系统
J Clin Nurs. 2017 May;26(9-10):1414-1427. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13576. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research.姑息治疗研究中守门现象原因的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):533-48. doi: 10.1177/0269216315616759. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
3
Recruitment and Reasons for Non-Participation in a Family-Coping-Orientated Palliative Home Care Trial (FamCope).
弱势群体中的参与者招募:德国难民青少年定性研究的经验
Open Res Eur. 2023 Nov 7;2:47. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14654.2. eCollection 2022.
4
Health care professional recruitment of patients and family carers to palliative care randomised controlled trials: A qualitative multiple case study.卫生保健专业人员招募患者和家庭护理人员参与姑息治疗随机对照试验:一项定性多案例研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1540-1553. doi: 10.1177/02692163231197917. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
5
Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial.门诊癌症护理中的整体需求评估:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 4;13(5):e066829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066829.
6
What are the reasons for unfinished nursing care as perceived by hospitalized patients? Findings from a qualitative study.住院患者认为未完成护理的原因是什么?一项定性研究的结果。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):256-267. doi: 10.1111/hex.13652. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
7
Recruiters' perspectives of recruiting women during pregnancy and childbirth to clinical trials: A qualitative evidence synthesis.招聘人员在临床试验中招募孕妇和产妇的观点:定性证据综合分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234783. eCollection 2020.
8
Methodological challenges in conducting instrumentation research in non-communicative palliative care patients.在非交流性姑息治疗患者中进行仪器研究的方法学挑战。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Feb;51:151199. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2019.151199. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
一项以家庭应对为导向的姑息性家庭护理试验(FamCope)的招募情况及未参与原因
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(6):655-74. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2015.1082168.
4
Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.定性研究中确定严谨性策略的批判性分析
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
5
Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care--a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol.评估门诊癌症护理中的整体需求评估——一项随机对照试验:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 May 11;5(5):e006840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006840.
6
Barriers and facilitators to recruitment in mental health services: care coordinators' expectations and experience of referring to a psychosis research trial.心理健康服务招募中的障碍与促进因素:护理协调员转介至精神病研究试验的期望与经验
Psychol Psychother. 2015 Sep;88(3):335-50. doi: 10.1111/papt.12042. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
7
Why is high-quality research on palliative care so hard to do? Barriers to improved research from a survey of palliative care researchers.为什么高质量的姑息治疗研究如此难以开展?基于姑息治疗研究人员调查的研究改进障碍。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;17(7):782-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0589. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
8
Strategies to support recruitment of patients with life-limiting illness for research: the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group.支持招募晚期疾病患者参与研究的策略:姑息治疗研究合作组
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Dec;48(6):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 23.
9
Patient and public involvement in research and the Cancer Experiences Collaborative: benefits and challenges.患者和公众参与研究以及癌症体验协作组:益处与挑战
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Dec;5(5):518-21. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000548. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
10
Factors affecting recruitment to an observational multicentre palliative care study.影响一项多中心姑息治疗观察性研究招募工作的因素。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Sep;3(3):318-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000396. Epub 2013 Jan 7.