• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Strategies to support recruitment of patients with life-limiting illness for research: the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group.支持招募晚期疾病患者参与研究的策略:姑息治疗研究合作组
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Dec;48(6):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 23.
2
Developing the evidence base for palliative care: formation of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative and its first trial.构建姑息治疗的证据基础:姑息治疗研究协作组的组建及其首个试验
Hosp Pract (1995). 2010;38(3):137-43. doi: 10.3810/hp.2010.06.320.
3
Better Together: The Making and Maturation of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group.携手共进:姑息治疗研究合作组的组建与成熟
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jun;20(6):584-591. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0138. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
4
Using the 'Social Marketing Mix Framework' to explore recruitment barriers and facilitators in palliative care randomised controlled trials? A narrative synthesis review.运用“社会营销组合框架”来探索姑息治疗随机对照试验中的招募障碍和促进因素?一项叙述性综合评价。
Palliat Med. 2018 May;32(5):990-1009. doi: 10.1177/0269216318757623. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
5
Safety and benefit of discontinuing statin therapy in the setting of advanced, life-limiting illness: a randomized clinical trial.在晚期、危及生命的疾病背景下停用他汀类药物治疗的安全性和益处:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):691-700. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0289.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
A systematic review of strategies used to increase recruitment of people with cancer or organ failure into clinical trials: implications for palliative care research.一项关于用于增加癌症或器官衰竭患者参与临床试验招募人数的策略的系统评价:对姑息治疗研究的启示。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Apr;49(4):762-772.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.09.018. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
9
A strategy to advance the evidence base in palliative medicine: formation of a palliative care research cooperative group.推进姑息医学证据基础的策略:姑息治疗研究合作组的形成。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Dec;13(12):1407-13. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0261. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
10
Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study.随机试验的招募:试验入组与参与策略研究。STEPS研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(48):iii, ix-105. doi: 10.3310/hta11480.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of wearable sensor technology to enhance supportive care in hospitalized palliative patients (Support trial): a prospective preliminary pilot study.使用可穿戴传感器技术加强住院姑息治疗患者的支持性护理(支持试验):一项前瞻性初步试点研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 31;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01794-3.
2
Addressing Statistical Power and Increasing Diversity in Hospice Research: Electronic Medical Record Participant Identification Compared to Nurse Referral Approaches to Recruitment.解决临终关怀研究中的统计效力和多样性问题:电子病历参与者识别与护士推荐招募方法的比较。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec;68(6):594-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Methylphenidate Versus Placebo for Treating Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial.哌醋甲酯与安慰剂治疗晚期癌症患者疲劳的随机、双盲、多中心、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 10;42(20):2382-2392. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02639. Epub 2024 May 17.
4
Benefits, Harms, and Stakeholder Perspectives Regarding Opioid Therapy for Pain in Individuals With Metastatic Cancer: Protocol for a Descriptive Cohort Study.转移性癌症患者疼痛的阿片类药物治疗的益处、危害及利益相关者观点:一项描述性队列研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 13;13:e54953. doi: 10.2196/54953.
5
Palliative care for persons with late-stage Alzheimer's and related dementias and their caregivers: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.晚期阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆患者及其照护者的姑息治疗:一项随机临床试验方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 25;24(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07614-4.
6
Recruitment and retention challenges and strategies in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for children with cancer and their parents: a collective case study.心理社会干预在儿童癌症及其父母的随机对照试验中的招募和保留挑战与策略:一项集合案例研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Oct;182(10):4683-4706. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05139-1. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
7
Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis.了解招聘人员的观点是提高随机对照试验入组率的关键:一项定性证据综合研究。
Trials. 2022 Oct 20;23(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06818-4.
8
Success and failure factors of patient recruitment for industry-sponsored clinical trials and the role of the electronic health records-a qualitative interview study in the Nordic countries.行业资助的临床试验中患者招募的成功与失败因素以及电子健康记录的作用:北欧国家的定性访谈研究。
Trials. 2022 May 12;23(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06144-9.
9
Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis.姑息治疗中的决策制定:患者和家庭照护者的一致性和不一致性——系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Dec;13(4):374-385. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003525. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
10
Developing and Field Testing BOLSTER: A Nurse-Led Care Management Intervention to Support Patients and Caregivers following Hospitalization for Gynecologic Cancer-Associated Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.开发和现场测试 BOLSTER:一种护士主导的护理管理干预措施,用于支持妇科癌症相关腹膜癌病住院治疗后的患者和护理人员。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Sep;25(9):1367-1375. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0618. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

1
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会成人降低动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险的血胆固醇治疗指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2889-934. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
2
Overcoming recruitment challenges in palliative care clinical trials.克服姑息治疗临床试验中的招募挑战。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Nov;9(6):277-82. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000996. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
3
'Best practice' in developing and evaluating palliative and end-of-life care services: a meta-synthesis of research methods for the MORECare project.制定和评估姑息治疗和临终关怀服务的“最佳实践”:MORECare 项目研究方法的元综合。
Palliat Med. 2013 Dec;27(10):885-98. doi: 10.1177/0269216312467489. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
4
Statin prescribing patterns in a cohort of cancer patients with poor prognosis.预后不良的癌症患者队列中的他汀类药物处方模式。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Apr;16(4):412-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0158. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
5
Overcoming barriers to recruitment in care of the dying research in hospitals.克服临终关怀研究在医院招募中的障碍。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 May;45(5):859-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
6
A comparison of strategies to recruit older patients and carers to end-of-life research in primary care.在初级保健中招募老年患者和护理人员参与临终研究的策略比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 27;12:342. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-342.
7
Benefits and harms of statin therapy for persons with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.他汀类药物治疗慢性肾脏病患者的获益和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 21;157(4):263-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00007.
8
Compassion and vigilance: investigators' strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research.同情与警惕:研究人员在姑息治疗和临终关怀研究中管理伦理问题的策略。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Aug;15(8):880-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0515. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
9
Efficacy of statin therapy in chronic systolic cardiac insufficiency: a meta-analysis.他汀类药物治疗慢性收缩性心力衰竭的疗效:荟萃分析。
Eur J Intern Med. 2011 Oct;22(5):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
10
Association of ICU or hospital admission with unintentional discontinuation of medications for chronic diseases.入住 ICU 或医院与慢性疾病药物意外停药的关联。
JAMA. 2011 Aug 24;306(8):840-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1206.

支持招募晚期疾病患者参与研究的策略:姑息治疗研究合作组

Strategies to support recruitment of patients with life-limiting illness for research: the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group.

作者信息

Hanson Laura C, Bull Janet, Wessell Kathryn, Massie Lisa, Bennett Rachael E, Kutner Jean S, Aziz Noreen M, Abernethy Amy

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Cecil B. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Four Seasons Hospice and Palliative Care, Flat Rock, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Dec;48(6):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.008
PMID:24863152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4241388/
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC) is the first clinical trials cooperative for palliative care in the U.S.

OBJECTIVES

To describe barriers and strategies for recruitment during the inaugural PCRC clinical trial.

METHODS

The parent study was a multisite randomized controlled trial enrolling adults with life expectancy anticipated to be one to six months, randomized to discontinue statins (intervention) vs. to continue on statins (control). To study recruitment best practices, we conducted semistructured interviews with 18 site principal investigators (PIs) and clinical research coordinators (CRCs) and reviewed recruitment rates. Interviews covered three topics: 1) successful strategies for recruitment, 2) barriers to recruitment, and 3) optimal roles of the PI and CRC.

RESULTS

All eligible site PIs and CRCs completed interviews and provided data on statin protocol recruitment. The parent study completed recruitment of 381 patients. Site enrollment ranged from 1 to 109 participants, with an average of 25 enrolled per site. Five major barriers included difficulty locating eligible patients, severity of illness, family and provider protectiveness, seeking patients in multiple settings, and lack of resources for recruitment activities. Five effective recruitment strategies included systematic screening of patient lists, thoughtful messaging to make research relevant, flexible protocols to accommodate patients' needs, support from clinical champions, and the additional resources of a trials cooperative group.

CONCLUSION

The recruitment experience from the multisite PCRC yields new insights into methods for effective recruitment to palliative care clinical trials. These results will inform training materials for the PCRC and may assist other investigators in the field.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗研究合作组(PCRC)是美国首个姑息治疗临床试验合作组。

目的

描述PCRC首次临床试验期间的招募障碍及策略。

方法

母研究是一项多中心随机对照试验,纳入预期寿命为1至6个月的成年人,随机分为停用他汀类药物(干预组)与继续使用他汀类药物(对照组)。为研究最佳招募实践,我们对18位研究点主要研究者(PI)和临床研究协调员(CRC)进行了半结构化访谈,并审查了招募率。访谈涵盖三个主题:1)成功的招募策略,2)招募障碍,3)PI和CRC的最佳角色。

结果

所有符合条件的研究点PI和CRC均完成访谈,并提供了他汀类药物方案招募的数据。母研究完成了381例患者的招募。各研究点的入组人数从1至109名参与者不等,平均每个研究点入组25人。五个主要障碍包括难以找到符合条件的患者、疾病严重程度、家属和医疗服务提供者的保护意识、在多个场所寻找患者以及招募活动缺乏资源。五个有效的招募策略包括系统筛选患者名单、传达有针对性的信息以使研究具有相关性、制定灵活的方案以满足患者需求、获得临床支持者的支持以及试验合作组提供的额外资源。

结论

多中心PCRC的招募经验为姑息治疗临床试验的有效招募方法提供了新见解。这些结果将为PCRC的培训材料提供参考,并可能有助于该领域的其他研究者。