Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Domaine de Rockefeller, Lyon, France
Département des Études et de la Recherche, Institut d'études KPAM, Paris, France.
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 10;12(10):e061155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061155.
The improvement of patient experience (PE) is related to the experience of staff caring for them. Yet there is little evidence as to which interactions matter the most for both patients and staff, or how they are perceived by them. We aimed to summarise the interactions and the perceptions between patients and staff from studies by using both patient and staff experience data in healthcare institutions.
Scoping review.
We conducted a scoping review, including studies dealing with PE and staff experience. Two authors independently reviewed each title/abstract and the selected full-text articles. A list of variables (objective, study design, data sources, tools used, results, interactions, perceptions and actions) was charted and summarised using a narrative approach including both qualitative and quantitative data. Studies were grouped according to their objective and the key interactions summarised according to this stratification. The perceptions of patients and staff were identified in the results of selected studies and were classified into four categories: commonalities and disagreements of perceptions, patients' perceptions not perceived by professionals and professional's perceptions not perceived by patients.
A total of 42 studies were included. The stratification of studies by type of objective resulted in six groups that allowed to classify the key interactions (n=154) identified in the results of the selected studies. A total of 128 perceptions related to interaction between patient and staff were reported with the following distribution: commonalities (n=35), disagreements (n=18), patients' perceptions not perceived by professionals (n=47) and professional's perceptions not perceived by patients (n=28). We separated positive and negative perceptions, which resulted in seven scenarios, each with actions that can be carried out for one or both populations to overcome barriers.
The study of both patient and staff experience allowed the identification of actions that can be taken to change the perceptions of patients and staff.
患者体验(PE)的改善与照顾他们的医护人员的体验有关。然而,几乎没有证据表明哪些互动对患者和医护人员最重要,以及他们如何看待这些互动。我们旨在总结医疗机构中患者和医护人员之间的互动和感知,同时使用患者和医护人员的体验数据。
范围综述。
我们进行了范围综述,包括涉及 PE 和员工体验的研究。两名作者独立审查了每个标题/摘要和选定的全文文章。列出了变量(目标、研究设计、数据源、使用的工具、结果、互动、感知和行动),并使用包括定性和定量数据的叙述方法进行了总结。研究根据其目标进行分组,并根据这种分层总结关键互动。在选定研究的结果中确定了患者和医护人员的感知,并将其分为四类:感知的共同点和分歧、患者的感知未被专业人员感知以及专业人员的感知未被患者感知。
共纳入 42 项研究。根据目标类型对研究进行分层,分为六组,允许对选定研究结果中确定的关键互动(n=154)进行分类。共报告了 128 个与患者和医护人员互动相关的感知,其分布如下:共同点(n=35)、分歧(n=18)、患者的感知未被专业人员感知(n=47)和专业人员的感知未被患者感知(n=28)。我们将积极和消极的感知分开,结果产生了七个场景,每个场景都有可以为一个或两个群体实施的行动,以克服障碍。
研究患者和医护人员的体验可以确定可以采取哪些行动来改变患者和医护人员的感知。