Eden Aimee R, Hansen Elizabeth, Hagen Michael D, Peterson Lars E
1 The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY.
2 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Am J Med Qual. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):283-290. doi: 10.1177/1062860617738327. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
Physician performance and peer comparison feedback can affect physician care quality and patient outcomes. This study aimed to understand family physician perspectives of the value of performance feedback in quality improvement (QI) activities. This study analyzed American Board of Family Medicine open-ended survey data collected between 2004 and 2014 from physicians who completed a QI module that provided pre- and post-QI project individual performance data and peer comparisons. Physicians made 3480 comments in response to a question about this performance feedback, which were generally positive in nature (86%). Main themes that emerged were importance of accurate feedback data, enhanced detail in the content of feedback, and ability to customize peer comparison groups to compare performance to peers with similar patient populations or practice characteristics. Meaningful and tailored performance feedback may be an important tool for physicians to improve their care quality and should be considered an integral part of QI project design.
医生的表现及同行比较反馈会影响医疗质量和患者治疗结果。本研究旨在了解家庭医生对质量改进(QI)活动中绩效反馈价值的看法。本研究分析了美国家庭医学委员会2004年至2014年间收集的开放式调查数据,这些数据来自完成了一个QI模块的医生,该模块提供了QI项目前后的个人绩效数据及同行比较。针对关于该绩效反馈的一个问题,医生们给出了3480条评论,这些评论总体上是积极的(86%)。出现的主要主题包括准确反馈数据的重要性、反馈内容细节的增强,以及定制同行比较组以与具有相似患者群体或执业特征的同行比较绩效的能力。有意义且量身定制的绩效反馈可能是医生提高医疗质量的重要工具,应被视为QI项目设计的一个组成部分。