• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护隐私的架构,用于向临床医生提供其临床绩效的反馈。

Privacy-preserving architecture for providing feedback to clinicians on their clinical performance.

机构信息

Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, 9019, Tromsø, Norway.

Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 22;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01147-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-01147-5
PMID:32571306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7310252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Learning from routine healthcare data is important for the improvement of the quality of care. Providing feedback on clinicians' performance in comparison to their peers has been shown to be more efficient for quality improvements. However, the current methods for providing feedback do not fully address the privacy concerns of stakeholders.

METHODS

The paper proposes a distributed architecture for providing feedback to clinicians on their clinical performances while protecting their privacy. The indicators for the clinical performance of a clinician are computed within a healthcare institution based on pseudonymized data extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) system. Group-level indicators of clinicians across healthcare institutions are computed using privacy-preserving distributed data-mining techniques. A clinician receives feedback reports that compare his or her personal indicators with the aggregated indicators of the individual's peers. Indicators aggregated across different geographical levels are the basis for monitoring changes in the quality of care. The architecture feasibility was practically evaluated in three general practitioner (GP) offices in Norway that consist of about 20,245 patients. The architecture was applied for providing feedback reports to 21 GPs on their antibiotic prescriptions for selected respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Each GP received one feedback report that covered antibiotic prescriptions between 2015 and 2018, stratified yearly. We assessed the privacy protection and computation time of the architecture.

RESULTS

Our evaluation indicates that the proposed architecture is feasible for practical use and protects the privacy of the patients, clinicians, and healthcare institutions. The architecture also maintains the physical access control of healthcare institutions over the patient data. We sent a single feedback report to each of the 21 GPs. A total of 14,396 cases were diagnosed with the selected RTIs during the study period across the institutions. Of these cases, 2924 (20.3%) were treated with antibiotics, where 40.8% (1194) of the antibiotic prescriptions were narrow-spectrum antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to provide feedback to clinicians on their clinical performance in comparison to peers across healthcare institutions while protecting privacy. The architecture also enables monitoring changes in the quality of care following interventions.

摘要

背景

从常规医疗保健数据中学习对于提高护理质量很重要。与同行相比,提供临床医生绩效反馈对于质量改进更为有效。然而,目前提供反馈的方法并没有完全解决利益相关者的隐私问题。

方法

本文提出了一种分布式架构,用于在保护隐私的同时向临床医生提供其临床绩效反馈。临床医生的临床绩效指标是根据从电子健康记录(EHR)系统中提取的匿名化数据在医疗机构内计算的。使用隐私保护的分布式数据挖掘技术计算医疗机构之间的临床医生的组级指标。临床医生收到的反馈报告将其个人指标与同行的个体指标进行比较。不同地理水平上聚合的指标是监测护理质量变化的基础。该架构的可行性在挪威的三个全科医生(GP)办公室中进行了实际评估,这三个办公室共包含约 20245 名患者。该架构应用于为 21 名 GP 提供有关选定呼吸道感染(RTI)抗生素处方的反馈报告。每位 GP 都收到一份涵盖 2015 年至 2018 年的反馈报告,每年分层。我们评估了架构的隐私保护和计算时间。

结果

我们的评估表明,所提出的架构可实际使用,并保护患者、临床医生和医疗机构的隐私。该架构还维护了医疗机构对患者数据的物理访问控制。我们向 21 名 GP 中的每一位都发送了一份反馈报告。在整个机构中,研究期间共有 14396 例被诊断出患有所选 RTI。其中,2924 例(20.3%)接受了抗生素治疗,其中 40.8%(1194)的抗生素处方为窄谱抗生素。

结论

在保护隐私的同时,向临床医生提供与医疗机构内同行相比的临床绩效反馈是可行的。该架构还能够在干预后监测护理质量的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/10826eba3cd9/12911_2020_1147_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/ce2195e3d0dc/12911_2020_1147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/01e64e892a46/12911_2020_1147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/485329c018b8/12911_2020_1147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/10826eba3cd9/12911_2020_1147_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/ce2195e3d0dc/12911_2020_1147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/01e64e892a46/12911_2020_1147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/485329c018b8/12911_2020_1147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3013/7310252/10826eba3cd9/12911_2020_1147_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Privacy-preserving architecture for providing feedback to clinicians on their clinical performance.保护隐私的架构,用于向临床医生提供其临床绩效的反馈。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 22;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01147-5.
2
A Privacy-Preserving Audit and Feedback System for the Antibiotic Prescribing of General Practitioners: Survey Study.全科医生抗生素处方的隐私保护审计与反馈系统:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 13;6(7):e31650. doi: 10.2196/31650.
3
Can antibiotic prescriptions in respiratory tract infections be improved? A cluster-randomized educational intervention in general practice--the Prescription Peer Academic Detailing (Rx-PAD) Study [NCT00272155].呼吸道感染的抗生素处方能否得到改善?一项在全科医疗中进行的整群随机教育干预——处方同行学术指导(Rx-PAD)研究 [NCT00272155]。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 15;6:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-75.
4
Distributed clinical data sharing via dynamic access-control policy transformation.通过动态访问控制策略转换实现分布式临床数据共享。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 May;89:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
Efficient Privacy-Preserving Access Control Scheme in Electronic Health Records System.电子健康记录系统中的高效隐私保护访问控制方案。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Oct 18;18(10):3520. doi: 10.3390/s18103520.
6
A Distributed Ensemble Approach for Mining Healthcare Data under Privacy Constraints.一种隐私约束下挖掘医疗保健数据的分布式集成方法。
Inf Sci (N Y). 2016 Feb 10;330:245-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.10.011.
7
What Drives Variation in Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infections?是什么导致急性呼吸道感染抗生素处方的差异?
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):918-24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3643-0. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
8
Privacy-Preserving in Healthcare Blockchain Systems Based on Lightweight Message Sharing.基于轻量级消息共享的医疗保健区块链系统中的隐私保护。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 29;20(7):1898. doi: 10.3390/s20071898.
9
A novel system architecture for the national integration of electronic health records: a semi-centralized approach.一种用于电子健康记录全国整合的新型系统架构:半集中式方法。
J Med Syst. 2013 Aug;37(4):9953. doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-9953-4. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
10
PAX: Using Pseudonymization and Anonymization to Protect Patients' Identities and Data in the Healthcare System.PAX:在医疗保健系统中使用化名和匿名化来保护患者的身份和数据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 27;16(9):1490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091490.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated extraction of standardized antibiotic resistance and prescription data from laboratory information systems and electronic health records: a narrative review.从实验室信息系统和电子健康记录中自动提取标准化抗生素耐药性和处方数据:一篇叙述性综述。
Front Antibiot. 2024 Mar 8;3:1380380. doi: 10.3389/frabi.2024.1380380. eCollection 2024.
2
A Privacy-Preserving Audit and Feedback System for the Antibiotic Prescribing of General Practitioners: Survey Study.全科医生抗生素处方的隐私保护审计与反馈系统:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 13;6(7):e31650. doi: 10.2196/31650.
3
The Norwegian PraksisNett: a nationwide practice-based research network with a novel IT infrastructure.

本文引用的文献

1
Between Access and Privacy: Challenges in Sharing Health Data.在获取与隐私之间:共享健康数据面临的挑战
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):55-59. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641216. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
2
A 21st Century Embarrassment of Riches: The Balance Between Health Data Access, Usage, and Sharing.21世纪丰富资源的尴尬处境:健康数据访问、使用与共享之间的平衡
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):5-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641213. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
3
The Privacy and Security Implications of Open Data in Healthcare.医疗保健领域开放数据的隐私与安全影响
挪威 PraksisNett:一个具有新型 IT 基础设施的全国性实践为基础的研究网络。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Jun;40(2):217-226. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2073966. Epub 2022 May 13.
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):41-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641201. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
4
Physician Perceptions of Performance Feedback in a Quality Improvement Activity.医生对质量改进活动中绩效反馈的看法。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):283-290. doi: 10.1177/1062860617738327. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
5
Effects of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care 12 Months After Stopping Interventions.行为干预停止12个月后对基层医疗中不适当抗生素处方的影响。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1391-1392. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11152.
6
SAFE: SPARQL Federation over RDF Data Cubes with Access Control.SAFE:具有访问控制的基于RDF数据立方体的SPARQL联邦。
J Biomed Semantics. 2017 Feb 1;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13326-017-0112-6.
7
Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care.浪费医生的时间?初级保健中患者的视频引出访谈研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;176:113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
8
Secure and scalable deduplication of horizontally partitioned health data for privacy-preserving distributed statistical computation.用于隐私保护分布式统计计算的水平分区健康数据的安全且可扩展的重复数据删除
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0389-x.
9
Towards a privacy preserving cohort discovery framework for clinical research networks.面向临床研究网络的隐私保护队列发现框架
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Feb;66:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
The Learning Healthcare System: Where are we now? A systematic review.学习型医疗保健系统:我们目前处于什么阶段?一项系统综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 28.