1 Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
2 Department of Sociology and Policy, Aston University, UK.
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(4):471-477. doi: 10.1177/1403494817738692. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
'Participation and influence in society' is the first of 11 objective domains in Swedish public health policy. The aim of this article is to investigate the views of the Swedish general population on the impact of a range of health participation activities, and whether these views were associated with sociodemographic characteristics.
The study utilizes a national representative survey of the Swedish population, aged 15 years and over ( n = 1500).
Apart from voting in regional elections - which most of the respondents believed to be an influential way to make improvements in healthcare (74%) - respondents believed more in individual patient activities than activities associated with adopting a citizen role and acting collectively. A majority of respondents believed in the impact of replying to patient surveys (67%), making a complaint (61%), talking directly to staff (58%) or changing their healthcare provider (54%). Fewer believed in the impact of joining a patient organization (46%), taking part in a citizen council (35%) or joining a political party (34%). Beliefs in impact increased with educational attainment and decreased with age.
The results suggest people have more confidence in the impact of participating as individual patients rather than collectively and as citizens. To ensure that activities enable 'participation and influence in society', complementary opportunities for collective involvement that also take into account under-represented voices such as those with a low level of education need to be developed.
“参与和影响社会”是瑞典公共卫生政策 11 个目标领域中的第一个。本文旨在调查瑞典普通民众对一系列健康参与活动的影响的看法,以及这些看法是否与社会人口特征有关。
本研究利用全国代表性调查,调查了年龄在 15 岁及以上的瑞典人口(n=1500)。
除了投票参加地区选举——大多数受访者认为这是改善医疗保健的一种有影响力的方式(74%)——受访者更相信个人患者活动,而不是与承担公民角色和集体行动相关的活动。大多数受访者认为回复患者调查(67%)、投诉(61%)、直接与员工交谈(58%)或更换医疗服务提供者(54%)会产生影响。较少的人认为加入患者组织(46%)、参加公民委员会(35%)或加入政党(34%)会产生影响。信念的影响随着教育程度的提高而增加,随着年龄的增长而减少。
结果表明,人们对作为个体患者参与而不是集体和作为公民参与的影响更有信心。为了确保活动能够“参与和影响社会”,需要开发补充的集体参与机会,同时考虑到代表性不足的声音,如教育程度较低的人的声音。