Radtke Thomas, Nevitt Sarah J, Hebestreit Helge, Kriemler Susi
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, Zurich, Switzerland, 8001.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 1;11(11):CD002768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002768.pub4.
Physical exercise training may form an important part of regular care for people with cystic fibrosis. This is an update of a previously published review.
To assess the effects of physical exercise training on exercise capacity by peak oxygen consumption, pulmonary function by forced expiratory volume in one second, health-related quality of life and further important patient-relevant outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis.
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 04 May 2017.We searched ongoing trials registers (clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP). Date of most recent search: 10 August 2017.
All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials comparing exercise training of any type and a minimum duration of two weeks with conventional care (no training) in people with cystic fibrosis.
Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed methodological quality and extracted data. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE system.
Of the 83 studies identified, 15 studies which included 487 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The numbers in each study ranged from nine up to 72 participants; two studies were in adults, seven were in children and adolescents and six studies included all age ranges. Four studies of hospitalised participants lasted less than one month and 11 studies were outpatient-based, lasting between two months and three years. The studies included participants with a wide range of disease severity and employed differing levels of supervision with a mixture of types of training. There was also wide variation in the quality of the included studies.This systematic review shows very low- to low-quality evidence from both short- and long-term studies that in people with cystic fibrosis aerobic or anaerobic physical exercise training (or a combination of both) has a positive effect on aerobic exercise capacity, pulmonary function and health-related quality of life. No study reported on mortality; two studies reported on adverse events (moderate-quality evidence); one of each study reported on pulmonary exacerbations (low-quality evidence) and diabetic control (very low-quality evidence). Although improvements were not consistent between studies and ranged from no effects to clearly positive effects, the most consistent effects of the heterogeneous exercise training modalities and durations were found for maximal aerobic exercise capacity (in four out of seven studies) with unclear effects on forced expiratory volume in one second (in two out of 11 studies) and health-related quality of life (in two out of seven studies).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence about the efficacy of physical exercise training in cystic fibrosis from 15 small studies with low to moderate methodological quality is limited. Exercise training is already part of regular outpatient care offered to most people with cystic fibrosis, and since there is some evidence for beneficial effects on aerobic fitness and no negative side effects exist, there is no reason to actively discourage this. The benefits from including physical exercise training in an individual's regular care may be influenced by the type and duration of the training programme. High-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to comprehensively assess the benefits of exercise programmes in people with cystic fibrosis and the relative benefits of the addition of aerobic versus anaerobic versus a combination of both types of physical exercise training to the care of people with cystic fibrosis.
体育锻炼训练可能是囊性纤维化患者常规护理的重要组成部分。这是对先前发表的一篇综述的更新。
评估体育锻炼训练对囊性纤维化患者运动能力(通过峰值耗氧量评估)、肺功能(通过一秒用力呼气量评估)、健康相关生活质量以及其他重要的患者相关结局的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化和遗传疾病小组试验注册库,该注册库包含从全面的电子数据库检索以及对相关期刊和会议论文摘要集的手工检索中识别出的参考文献。最近一次检索日期:2017年5月4日。我们检索了正在进行的试验注册库(clinicaltrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台)。最近一次检索日期:2017年8月10日。
所有比较任何类型且最短持续时间为两周的运动训练与常规护理(无训练)的随机和半随机对照临床试验,受试者为囊性纤维化患者。
两位作者独立选择纳入研究、评估方法学质量并提取数据。使用GRADE系统评估证据质量。
在识别出的83项研究中,15项研究(包括487名参与者)符合纳入标准。每项研究的参与者人数从9人到72人不等;两项研究针对成年人,七项针对儿童和青少年,六项研究涵盖所有年龄范围。四项针对住院参与者的研究持续时间不到一个月,11项研究为门诊研究,持续时间在两个月到三年之间。这些研究纳入了疾病严重程度差异很大的参与者,并采用了不同程度的监督以及多种类型的训练。纳入研究的质量也存在很大差异。该系统评价显示,来自短期和长期研究的证据质量都非常低到低,即对于囊性纤维化患者,有氧或无氧体育锻炼训练(或两者结合)对有氧运动能力、肺功能和健康相关生活质量有积极影响。没有研究报告死亡率;两项研究报告了不良事件(中等质量证据);每项研究各有一项报告了肺部加重(低质量证据)和糖尿病控制情况(极低质量证据)。尽管各研究之间的改善情况不一致,范围从无效果到明显的积极效果,但在七项研究中有四项发现,异质性运动训练方式和持续时间对最大有氧运动能力的影响最为一致,对一秒用力呼气量(11项研究中有两项)和健康相关生活质量(七项研究中有两项)的影响不明确。
来自15项方法学质量低到中等的小型研究的关于体育锻炼训练对囊性纤维化疗效的证据有限。运动训练已经是大多数囊性纤维化患者常规门诊护理的一部分,并且由于有一些证据表明其对有氧适能有有益影响且不存在负面副作用,因此没有理由积极劝阻。将体育锻炼训练纳入个人常规护理的益处可能会受到训练计划的类型和持续时间的影响。需要高质量的随机对照试验来全面评估运动计划对囊性纤维化患者的益处,以及在囊性纤维化患者护理中增加有氧、无氧或两者结合的体育锻炼训练的相对益处。